Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/11/2023 7:39:10 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lowbridge

Under the circumstances, his profit is 100%.


2 posted on 12/11/2023 7:42:08 AM PST by I-ambush (From the brightest star comes the blackest hole. You had so much to offer, why didya offer your sou?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Who said crime doesn’t pay? Squatters are a plague, both in the UK and here, and their crimes need to be punished in criminal courts, not civil courts.


3 posted on 12/11/2023 7:42:25 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

If taxes were paid by the true homeowner, the court (judge who gave the title) away have no business in determining ownership, IMO.


4 posted on 12/11/2023 7:45:19 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Its not “quirky” and there is a reason for it. Yes, I didn’t like Adverse Possession either when I first learned about it in my first year of law school. The purpose of it however is to put land to maximum economic productive use. If you have an owner who is absent, who just goes away and leaves a property to fall into rack and ruin, it is better that somebody put that property to productive use.

The actual owner can come back and evict the squatter for many years - the common law says 10 years. This is governed by statute in most US states and its rare to be less than 7 years. Also, in many states, the squatter has to be paying the annual property tax on the property for that time. IF the owner does not come back and evict the squatter after that time though.....tough. The squatter can then legally claim it. The squatter is the one who was paying the taxes and upkeep and making it productive rather than just wasting it all that time.

The moral of the story.....don’t sit on your rights. If you don’t exercise them, you could lose them.


5 posted on 12/11/2023 7:47:38 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

You do not ever ‘own’ real estate.

You simply rent it from the government...............


9 posted on 12/11/2023 7:57:11 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while l aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Very odd - did he not check on the property during any of that time?

My mother’s house sat empty for a year after she died - we checked on it once a week - and had a Ring Camera set up so we knew who was on the property at any given time.


16 posted on 12/11/2023 8:10:40 AM PST by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Back in the 90's, my brother-in-law, who was from Honduras, purchased a sizable piece of ocean front property along the undeveloped coastline outside of Trujillo in Honduras with plans to eventually build a vacation home.

Over time, he, along with other property owners, had to hire private security to keep squatters from taking over their properties.

A few years ago, he discovered that the government had taken over the property and sold it off to some crony, while at the same time my BIL continued to pay taxes on it.......

17 posted on 12/11/2023 8:11:53 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (This Is The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
There are similar laws in some...perhaps many...states.It's called “adverse possession”. I bought a house years ago where my lawyer said that there was a danger of adverse possession so he told me to hold off. It was eventually resolved and I bought the house.
18 posted on 12/11/2023 8:14:50 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Let me tell you about squatters. I had a rental home (I could not sell it after moving to a new state for a job), so I stopped paying the mortgage and the property was foreclosed and sold at auction. Nobody lost money, and the police would not help because the squatters were the subject of an active investigation. So title passed to a new owner and I am no longer the owner of the property.


25 posted on 12/11/2023 8:42:43 AM PST by Kenny500c ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Everything about this story stinks. The fact that the (elderly and soon to die) owner son PAID TAXES for a home that was stolen by another man. And also that the neighbors were all angry: "there is no way Best should have got his hands on it for free. A lot of people around here are still very angry that he was allowed to get away with it and that the law backed him."

And the ending it perhaps the worst of it: "He sold the home to Atiq Hayat, 35, for £540,000." 'Nuff said.

26 posted on 12/11/2023 8:53:17 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
The judge found that at least 10 years had passed "without effective action by the owner" to take control of the property. 

10 years? Sounds like no one cared that the squatter took up residence.

28 posted on 12/11/2023 8:55:45 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

you’d think those laws would be revisited, and you’d be wrong...


30 posted on 12/11/2023 9:17:36 AM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

10yrs is a long time. I guess Colin Curtis didn’t need the money or he would have sold it.


32 posted on 12/11/2023 9:52:07 AM PST by nuconvert ( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Am I the only one who noticed that the text of the article contradicts itself.
The house, however, belonged to retiree Colin Curtis, who lived on the property with his mother until the late 1990s, when he moved out. Curtis inherited the property, but under what has been described as a "quirky" ancient Roman law that allows "someone in possession of a good without title to become the lawful proprietor if the original owner didn't show up after some time,"

The judge ruled that previous laws approached squatting issues as civil matters, and despite the judge finding Curtis committed criminal trespass, he was granted ownership of the home. The judge found that at least 10 years had passed "without effective action by the owner" to take control of the property.

Then I noticed this:

The home was worth roughly £400,000 when Best took over the property. He sold the home to Atiq Hayat, 35, for £540,000 - the equivalent of roughly $682,000 - meaning he made a profit of roughly £140,000, or $177,000, the Daily Mail found.
If Best got the house without paying for it his profit was the full £540,000 ($682,000).

The author and editor need to be fired.

34 posted on 12/11/2023 9:57:22 AM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

No big deal!
The U.S. is being taken over by MIV (Migrant Invader Vermin) squatters and no one is raising a finger to stop it...


42 posted on 12/11/2023 11:59:48 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Based on an ancient Roman law? Are they going to start crucifying Christians in England now?


46 posted on 12/11/2023 1:20:22 PM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't match your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

“What have the Romans ever done for us?”


48 posted on 12/11/2023 5:08:24 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Imported violent Muslims own the UK now.


49 posted on 12/11/2023 9:53:58 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson