Posted on 12/08/2023 5:54:35 PM PST by bitt
Jeff Childers, Esq. @jchilders98
12/7/2023
Pfizer must feel like it’s been one damned thing after another lately. In a year packed with horrible news for the jabs (not to mention poor jab recipients), yesterday saw a critical new discovery of jab problems, possibly the worst and most damning yet.
How bad was it? It was so bad that, even though I almost never make predictions anymore, I will predict this: The FDA will be forced to withdraw the mRNA covid shots because of this study.
I’m not even joking about that.
Our investigation begins with yesterday’s Telegraph article about a new study headlined, “One in four who had Moderna or Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response.” (https://archive.ph/sJ3ic#selection-2303.61-2307.8)
The explosive, new, peer-reviewed, gold-standard study is already making news even though it was only published yesterday, December 6th. And it published in the well—respected Journal Nature, featuring the multisyllabic, incomprehensible title, “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting.” (https://nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3)
This study features twenty authors. There is safety in numbers.
Don’t let the mind-numbing title fool you. If Kevin McKernan’s SV40 monkey-virus discovery tossed a hand-grenade into Pfizer’s machine-gun bunker, this carefully-written study dropped a tactical nuke on Pfizer’s Pacific Fleet anchoring at Hawaii. The study’s implications are vast.
Since the science is a little thick — no, it’s very thick — I’ll start by telling you the end first.
Here’s how the Telegraph’s article defensively described the study’s results. Keep in mind, they were down-playing the results, as much as they possibly could:
No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production (and) an immune system flare-up. The new study, published in Nature, found this occurred in around 25-30 per cent of people.
Hahaha! The vaccines were “not perfect!!” Omygosh! Please, stop! Hahahaha! It hurts to laugh! Whew. Alright, I’m okay now. Onwards.
Here’s the simple version: the researchers discovered that a necessary ingredient in the mRNA vaccines (1-methylpseudouridine) has an unfortunate side-effect: it messes up RNA translation one-third of the time by slipping a gear every so often. Instead of making the intended spike protein, these tiny mistranslational slip-ups create … other things. Other kinds of proteins. New ones.
And there’s no way at all to predict what kind of protein it will create. It’s stochastic (completely random).
...more
I, for one, welcome our new “Nylon Bug” overlords!
LOL! :-D
I knew there was some issue - supposedly, you could donate your own blood prior to a surgery, should you need it. Now, I don’t know about that.
My dad was a surgical tech during WWII at an Army hospital in Hawaii. They received wounded patients by hospital ship from the Pacific Theater - they worked long, hectic days when there was a ship that came in. One day, he was told a certain patient needed a transfusion - dad donated his own blood & took it to the patient to transfuse him. The patient told dad “that better be some GOOD blood you’re giving me” .... dad told him “it is ... it’s mine, just took it out of my arm!”
Scientifically demonstrated.
But that's not enough to demonstrate macroevolution, as I pointed out.
PS Thanks for the link. 🙂
> Thanks for the link.
Any time!
Your comments on this thread would be of interest.
But it is recorded in fossils. THe horse series from 5 toes to one toe is an example with many stages in between
wgmalabama wrote: “Your comments on this thread would be of interest.”
From the article: “No adverse effects were created by the error, data show...” That’s all you need to know at this point.
They haven’t looked yet. I figured that would be your response. Yet we know adverse events are occurring due to the Vax and will continue to occur. Are you planning on going down with ship on this one? I can’t figure you out. I don’t think your a paid participant or an active Fed Gov employee. So I’m curious if you’re ever willing to be objective and see the Vax was worse than the disease. I guess we will see over time.
Part of the paper - Professor Anne Willis, Director of the MRC Toxicology Unit) adds it is very exciting that there is a way to fix the issue, which “massively de-risks this platform going forward”
wgmalabama wrote: “They haven’t looked yet. I figured that would be your response. Yet we know adverse events are occurring due to the Vax and will continue to occur. Are you planning on going down with ship on this one? I can’t figure you out. I don’t think your a paid participant or an active Fed Gov employee. So I’m curious if you’re ever willing to be objective and see the Vax was worse than the disease. I guess we will see over time.”
That’s the only response possible at this time. The data doesn’t support anything else. And, no I’m not willing to admit the vaccine is worse than the disease. Almost seven million deaths from the disease and a few, a very few, deaths that can be attributed to the vaccine.
Too many are too eager to jump to the conclusion that all adverse reactions are due to the vaccine. The data simply doesn’t support that.
Quite frankly, this thread is typical of the hysterical and hyperbolic reaction to any information that might support the anti-vaccine agenda. As I’ve stated previously, this reaction is consistent with the historical response to vaccines dating back 400+ years. Conceptually, there is no difference from the reaction to this vaccine and the reaction to the small pox vaccine of the 1700s. Back then, the small pox vaccine was supposed to turn people into cows and contained bat feces. Now, the covid vaccines are supposed to change your DNA and are poisonous.
It’s not just the COVID vaccines. You have the same anti-vaccine choir singing the same old gospels they sang against the measles, the HPV, the MMR, and all the rest of the vaccines.
That said, I will change my mind if/when some credible information becomes available. It hasn’t yet.
OMGosh.....this, is just horrific.
No other words.
😢
Except....string that FRAUDci up!!
Lest we forget 1
We have taken names, I suggest you all do the same.
We will never let these virtue signaling scum bags and gaslighters simply disappear into obscurity.
Each and every one of these vile fascistic parasites will be held to account one day. pic.twitter.com/uTY0yAokUC— Shaun Rickard (@ShaunRickard67) December 9, 2023
Thanks for the ping. Saw this posted on X.
If killing 17MM ppl isn’t enough to pull the clot shots, not sure this will work...
BTTT.
Thx.
Hope you get a chance to read the paper or a good and unbiased (in either direction) It is interesting. The data being discovered about the first effort on a new to humans, Vax tech.
I don’t care if anyone chooses to get the VidVax or not. I do care if data was not made public available to the point that informed consent was not possible. I also do not think the coercion was legal, moral or needed.
Once the data is out there, research isn’t rabbit holed, buried or even worse career ending then I will be willing to honestly say my mistake, I was wrong in my opinion based on the data I had at the time or say the mandated VidVax was a needless medical requirement and did more harm than good.
Unfortunately there are too many that are letting emotion run their thought process. I cannot tell if you are willing to collect data and be able to change your opinion.
Please do not label me anti-Vax. I am anti VidVax of the mRNA vectors. LNP or adenovirus vector. I may have been willing to take a more traditional version if it had more than 9 months of testing.
Anyway, just wondering if any of the 4 or 5 major changes from the original claims have or have started to get you to question the VidVax or its mandates/tracking/suspension of the constitution?
To lighten the topic:
What do you think about Bama jumping to the #4 spot. I’m not sure it was a good optics even though Bama had the most top 25 opponent team wins.
Will make for lots of people rooting against Bama and not sure this is one of the better teams Bama has in the Sabin era.
From patriots win:
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/why-anger-towards-the-unvaccinated
“Something had to be done about vaccine hesitancy, so along came Yale University with a study which began in July 2020. The study, which was not published online until October 2021 (once everyone was vaccinated) was to test “how persuasive messaging affects COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions”.
Yale was all over this as well. Rehearsing the messaging via studies and focus groups which will result in the highest damage, lethality and societal breakdown, the greatest antipathy within family groups to the dreaded ‘antivaxxers’, the messaging about how you are KILLING the vulnerable and helpless, how SELFISH the antivaxxers are, how SOMETHING must be done against these evil purveyors of disease and eroders of trust in the medical institutions..
Exactly like a criminal practicing breaking into cars before going ahead and trying it for real.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
