Posted on 11/19/2023 2:07:28 AM PST by george76
A world-renowned vaccine expert has presented evidence during congressional testimony showing that pharmaceutical giant Moderna knows its Covid mRNA shots cause cancer.
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, testified during a hearing on Capitol Hill led by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA).
During his testimony, Malone presented the patent for Moderna’s Covid vaccine.
Moderna’s patent shows that its COVID-19 vaccine vials contain billions of DNA fragments.
Those fragments, along with other contaminants, are linked to birth defects and cancer.
In the patent, Moderna admits that contaminants in the shots cause cancer.
However, as Malone highlights in his testimony, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) apparently ignored this admission when approving the shots for public use.
The failure raises major concerns, especially as several top FDA officials secured high-paying jobs with Moderna after they approved the injections, as Slay News reported.
During the hearing, Dr. Malone highlighted that Moderna acknowledges in its patent that RNA is preferable to DNA in vaccines.
RNA is preferred due to the risks involved, Malone explains.
Yet despite the risks, Moderna’s mRNA injection is contaminated with billions of fragments of DNA.
“Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines,” Malone told the hearing.
“And in that, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because of problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis that could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.
“FDA says they’re not aware of any concerns, but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA in insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity.
“So, Moderna knows it – DNA is a contaminant.
“It is left in because of the way they make it … they use DNA to make RNA, and then they degrade the DNA, and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA.
“And the process they are using is apparently not that good.”
...
A new preprint study up for peer review has found billions of residual DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine vials.
The lead author of the study, molecular virologist David Speicher, who has a doctorate in virology, told The Epoch Times that the study is “the largest study” on residual DNA in COVID-19 vaccines to date.
“In our study, we measured DNA copies of spike, ori (origin of replication), and SV40 enhancer genes,” he told the outlet.
“The loads of SV40 enhancer-promoter, ori, and virus spike in Pfizer are up to 186 billion copies per dose.”
The spike he refers to is the DNA sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which can be transcribed to spike mRNA to be used in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
The other two DNAs—SV40 enhancer genes and ori—help facilitate the replication of spike DNA.
However, the final mRNA vaccines should only include RNA and not residual DNA instructions for spike production.
The researchers sequenced the gene material in 27 mRNA vaccine vials from 12 different lots.
Nineteen vials were from Moderna, and eight were from Pfizer.
The documentation for Moderna’s patent suggests that there are certain DNA sequences present in the vials that are normally not allowed in anything that is going to go into humans, “not the least of which is an antibiotic resistance gene,” Malone explained.
“They include these sequences from Simian Virus 40 – not the whole virus, but highly active promoter sequences – which is exactly the thing that the FDA in their older regulations said must be avoided because it confers even more risk for insertional mutagenesis.”
Meanwhile, the study found that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA injection also contains the same contaminants.
Documentation was provided by the company to regulators in the U.S., Europe, and Canada.
According to Malone, these regulators removed the notation about SV40 sequences.
The removal of the information appears to be an apparent attempt to hide it from the public.
“The FDA didn’t take the raw DNA sequences, reconstruct those plasmid maps, and look at them themselves,” Malone clarifies.
“They just took for granted what Pfizer had given them.
“And now this is all coming out because of what these researchers found.”
Malone argues that executives and scientists at Moderna and Pfizer must have known about the risks.
Dr. Malone warned that those who have received the mRNA injections would likely be at risk from “anything that is associated with DNA damage.”
In terms of DNA damage, Malone explains that “birth defects and cancer [are] the most notable ones.”
Sod off troll.
Just /like 50 “intelligence experts” signed a letter that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) such as Fenbendazole and Ivermectin require true scientific research and clinical trials to verify their effectiveness.
The “Fenbendazole scandal” where false information treating cancer, was spread over social media by cancer patient Joe Tippens. Tippin’s case became sensational in South Korea. It caused national confusion and led to fenbendazole being sold out at pharmacies across the country in South Korea. Contrary to what the people know, however, Joe Tippens was a participant in the Kitruda clinical trial at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, and his improvement was found to be the effect of immuno-cancer drugs he was taking—not fenbendazole!!!
Similar false information is like the case for Ivermectin which has been shown ineffective in treating COVID-19 (according to a multi-site study—including KU Medical Center).
Those desperate to treat their cancer with Fenbendazole; rather than known treatments, should know that, so far, studies have provided no evidence that fenbendazole would have any value in cancer therapy. This general class of compounds is still going through further scientific investigation.
You can check out Joe Tippens in detail anytime. Fenbendazole is what cured him. Not MD Anderson. He says this. -—— https://templetonwellness.com/survivor-stories/cancer-survivor-joe-tippens/
Templeton Wellness Disclaimer:
“The entire content of this website is based on research conducted by the Templeton Wellness Foundation (TWF), unless otherwise noted. The information is presented for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose or prescribe any medical or psychological condition, nor to prevent, treat, mitigate or cure such conditions. The information contained herein is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a doctor or qualified healthcare professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information based on research and experience. TWF encourages you to make your own health care decisions based on your judgment and research in partnership with a qualified healthcare professional.”
I don’t really have time to further investigate Joe Tippens. There is plenty out there to discredit him, including the South Koreans.
By the way, the mRNA technology for cancer is going through clinical trials for cancer cures at this time.
Be careful my FRiend.
Leave it to Dung Beetle to drag feces into the conversation.
By the ear.
Here’s a working link to the doc.
https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/20200206362
Thanks.
IBTTD...
grey_whiskers wrote: “Here’s a working link to the doc.”
We’ve been through this before. Posting a link to a 342 page pdf isn’t the same as providing a direct quotation. Now, what is the specific, direct quotation including the exact wording, page, and paragraph.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Leave it to Dung Beetle to drag feces into the conversation.”
No, it was the anti-vaxxers who brought feces into the conversation.
OK, Dung Beetle, so how many people objecting to the clotshots, were alive when the smallpox vaccine was developed?
Post 82, which I was replying to, showed confusion over the link.
All I did was show the link was not fictitious.
You want more, go look for it yourself.
Post 98 was YOUR post, in which you explicitly mentioned bat feces, living up to your name of Dung Beetle.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Post 82, which I was replying to, showed confusion over the link.”
And, you still cannot provide a direct quotation that moderna admitted their mRNA shots caused cancer.
I wasn't the one making that claim, Dung Beetle.
Don't blame me for what someone else said.
In the meantime, since you have a working link, you're free to search through all 342 pages yourself.
It looks like a lot of the beginning is just graphs, so that might speed up your search.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Post 98 was YOUR post, in which you explicitly mentioned bat feces, living up to your name of Dung Beetle.”
Go back and read my comment which was the anti-vaxxers claimed the small pox vaccine contained bat feces. So, by your standards, the protestors agains the small pox vaccine were ‘Dung Bettles’.
Your post was the first mention of feces on this thread.
Which, as you have been trying to distract from, was about COVID-1984 mRNA shots and not smallpox.
So the charge that you dragged in feces by the ear, is validated.
grey_whiskers wrote: “I wasn’t the one making that claim, Dung Beetle. Don’t blame me for what someone else said.”
Until someone can provide a direct quotation, that claim is bogus.
Nope. It's indeterminate.
Go pester the person who made that claim, if you're too lazy to search for yourself.
grey_whiskers wrote: “OK, Dung Beetle, so how many people objecting to the clotshots, were alive when the smallpox vaccine was developed?”
The point is, those complaining about the covid vaccines are making conceptually the same claim made against the small pox vaccine.
BTW, your name calling only shows the childish nature of your comments.
So what? It's clear that plasmid contamination is real.
Might even fit the legal definition of depraved indifference.
Dung Beetle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.