Posted on 10/11/2023 8:36:38 PM PDT by RandFan
THOSE of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of CoV-SARS-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory, have had to endure unbelievable scorn, scientific ostracism and the ignominy of being ‘cancelled’ by the MSM as well as by professional colleagues for nearly three years now.
In the summer of 2020 a paper I co-authored, describing the findings of an Anglo-Norwegian team of scientists who had demonstrated unique ‘fingerprints’ of laboratory manipulation in the Covid virus, was suppressed in both the US and UK. This was at the time that the World Health Organization, leading science journals and others were going to huge lengths to persuade us that Covid was a natural occurrence, and that we should spend a lot more money to fight any such future threats.
Only now does the Telegraph (uncritically) report that the US government is no longer going to fund the research it denied doing for nearly three years and the MSM sat on. Yet it has been an open secret for anyone who follows primary sources of information (the ones ignored by the MSM and the BBC specifically, reported as misinformation by Ofcom and targeted by the Orwellian Counter-Disinformation Cell of the UK government) that mRNA vaccines did not do what it says on the vial, as it were.
First the ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised but travelled throughout the body and were found at post-mortems to be everywhere.
Accusations of dramatic variations in batch-to-batch variability – an absolute ‘no no’ in vaccine manufacture protocols – which could explain why side effects were more common in some batches than others were denied but were borne out by definitive Danish research reported here. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-dangers-is-this-the-strongest-evidence-yet/ These alarming concerns seem to have been brushed off by the regulators when they should have immediately begun investigating them in depth.
All the while the regulatory authorities and politicians, parroting their ‘highest standards’ assurances, have repeatedly declared the mounting disturbing UK Yellow Card and US VAERS adverse event reports to be nothing to be worried about.
Last June, whistleblowers led by the scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new issue of concern – that of serious levels of DNA contamination. Once again this was ignored by the MSM. Though quite happy to report the odd side effect from the vaccines as an excuse to point out that they are extremely rare, they have never addressed the increasingly problematic official ‘safe and effective’ mantra.
Finally there was a small breakthrough. An isolated but braver branch of the MSM in the form of the Spectator Australia has finally blown the lid on serious levels of contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid vaccines. The article describes how the genomics scientist Kevin McKernan from Boston used Pfizer and Moderna vials as controls in a study only to find that they contained highly significant DNA plasmid contamination. It reports that McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials, a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promoters are also well recognised as being oncogenic or cancer-inducing.
Others have confirmed these findings. A German biologist whistleblower has found contamination rates of up to 354 times the recommended limit. All this has been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is highly significant.
To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but Genetically Modified Organisms that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines. This has been recognised by the Australian version of the FDA, the TGA, which has changed the picture so much that the Premier of Victoria Dan Andrews, who was the greatest proponent of the vaccine and of its mandatory use, has resigned – though at the time of writing the vaccine has not been mentioned as the reason for his resignation. (Paula Jardine reported in these pages in December 2021 on this regulatory sleight of hand in granting vaccine Emergency Use Authorisations for what were gene therapies.)
All this data, which is slowly breaking through into the public domain, comes hard on the heels of the latest findings that booster vaccines actually increase the chance of getting infected by 3.6 times. This is according to an in-depth study published by the Cleveland Clinic, one of the largest health care organisations in the world, who monitored their staff as well as patients.
It gets worse. Supporters of this technology have claimed that it can be adapted to chase new variants. But it can’t. The results of bivalent vaccines (with components against at least two variants) are seeing the same result. Authors of the Cleveland study say that ‘there is not a single study that has shown that the Covid-19 bivalent vaccine protects against severe disease or death caused by the XBB lineages of the Omicron variant. At least one prior study has failed to find a protective effect of the bivalent vaccine against the XBB lineages of SARS-CoV-2.’
In one study, all bivalent-vaccinated mice which were challenged with Covid became ill.
This was predicted by many of us as the SARS viruses are subject to immunological imprinting: that is, once they have seen a vaccine they will make the same response to any close variant (this is also known as ‘antigenic sin‘) making further vaccines not only useless but more dangerous as they induce antibodies that enhance infection (ADE antibodies), not cross reactivity as has been claimed by the manufacturers.
This is not the end of the issues with the mRNA ‘vaccines’. Several immunology studies have shown that the boosters induce an antibody switch from neutralising subtypes to tolerising subtypes as well as inducing significant T cell suppression, all of which will encourage new infections and suppress the immune response to cancer.
At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.
So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.
Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London.
It is a hot mess of contamination, “unexpected” ramifications, immune system damage, physical reactions, intended harm, criminal grifting, bad science, and political malfeasance.
Yep.
“Deny - Deny - Deny.
Gee. Who does that?
Yes, the same infamous people who ignore “Cause and Effect”?
THOSE of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of CoV-SARS-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory, have had to endure unbelievable scorn, scientific ostracism
The SARS-CoV2 virus contains NO unnatural inserts. The sequence of SARS-CoV2 is in the public domain and anyone can check it. I checked it personally. Unnatural sequences simply are not there.
As for SARS-CoV2 sequences being similar to other sequences published by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it would be surprising if they were NOT similar. After all, the Wuhan Institute has been studying bat coronaviruses for years because scientists have long recognized the potential for a coronavirus to develop pandemic potential. They publish the sequences. Bat coronaviruses have similar sequences. Actually, all coronaviruses have similar sequences.
First the ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised but travelled throughout the body and were found at post-mortems to be everywhere.
It would have been REALLY nice to see a scientific reference to support this claim. I'm pretty good at finding references, even when antivaxxers purposely try to hide the actual papers they used. Professional antivaxxers do not like to give details of the papers they are misusing, even when they use real scientific papers. Sometimes, they just invent references. But I could find nothing that could be cherry-picked and misinterpreted to come up with such a claim. I used the search term "mrna vaccine systemic distribution" in the www.pubmed.gov medical/scientific literature database. Nope, didn't find it.
Last June, whistleblowers led by the scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new issue of concern – that of serious levels of DNA contamination.
This is speculation based on a paper that McKernan wrote and posted on some "pre-publication" website. The fact that he could not get it published in a legitimate scientific journal says a lot. For a detailed debunking of this claim, I refer to this article: Claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain DNA contaminants based on study of vials of “unknown provenance”; no evidence COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can alter DNA in people.
It reports that McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials, a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promoters are also well recognised as being oncogenic or cancer-inducing
This is also debunked in the article I linked. SV40 promoters are NOT oncogenic. A promoter is a gene element that signals to the RNA transcription enzymes to attach to the DNA and transcribe the gene following the promoter. Transcription is the biological process of "reading" DNA to make RNA. In mRNA vaccine production, the SV40 promoter actually causes transcription of an antibiotic resistance gene. The promoter used to make spike mRNA is a T7 promoter, which only works in bacteria. None of the DNA plasmids used to make the spike mRNA contain any oncogenes.
Interestingly, that debunking article points out that SARS-CoV2 genes do integrate into the genome of infected cells. But the vaccine spike mRNA can't do that.
Oh, I should point out that the integration of a virus genome into human DNA can potentially cause cancer. If that virus genome inserts itself into the promoter sequence of genes involved in regulating cell growth, it can cause them to become unregulated and grow uncontrollably.
Well, I think this is all I have the energy to debunk right now. This blog was written by piling on so many lies that it becomes extremely time-intensive to rebut every single one. And that highlights a challenge for the scientific community: we can only discern the truth through long and tedious research, but fear-mongerers can swamp our truths under massive volumes of lies in moments.
A typical gene:
Promoter--start of gene--middle of gene--end of gene--signal to stop transcription.
The RNA transcription enzymes attach on the promoter and fall off at the stop sequence.
It was totally unfair of libh8er to post a piece exposing the “turbo cancer” claim for ridiculous farce that it is. How can we ever scare people if such debunking is allowed??
But if the article from this Brit conspiracy website had been posted over in the Q Safe Space then mean mockers wouldn’t be able to post mean comments. Something to think about, moggy guy.
Poor little kids without their mom.
My strong, handsome son-in-law died recently of very aggressive liver, then kidney cancer. He was 55. He got Novavax, I believe that was the one-shot vax.
Get stuffed, $hot $hill.
So sorry to hear about your son in law. My condolences.
I’m sorry
Like Islam, climate change and transgenderism, anti vaxxism is a CULT. You will sooner change the minds of Gaza militants on Israel than the anti vax hysterics on the vaccine.
absolutely!
Recent report of COVID vaccine mRNA in human breast milk.
Also a few articles about the types of lnp used to deliver mRNA to different cell types. It appears to be well known that mRNA can be delivered to different body tissues. In fact, research is done in order to get the mRNA to the cells which would be needed to be affected by the therapeutic activity of mRNA translation.
This kind of stuff is beyond the scope of most medical literature as it is a nascent technology not in wide public use and it would be difficult to research it as the paradigm of “if you hear hoofbeats you don’t look for zebras” reigns.
IMHO....In a few more years it will be obvious that the phenomena of other tissue distribution was overlooked in the use of COVID mRNa injection as the risk/benefit ratio at the time favored use of the unproven widespread safety of the vaccine vs. COVID 19 infection.IMHO
Freegards
P.S....try duckduckgo...instead of Google for your searches... that’s where I found the articles reporting what I wrote here...technical journals...not opinion blogs...
bkmk
Safe AND effective
thx for the post: two comments:
really like ‘Spectator Australia’ for hard news, especially down there.
and i think the esteemed author’s sentence containing ‘... the SARS viruses are subject to immunological imprinting: that is, once they have seen a vaccine...’
sounds like he’s saying the virus is seeing the vaccine, which i think is incorrect. i think the use of ‘they’ is a bit awkward or confused. it shouldn’t be a pronoun read as viruses, it should refer to the immune system’s response to the virus or jab. ‘...that is, once the immune system has seen a vaccine...’ that comports better with my understanding of imprinting, antigenic sin, and ADE or anti-bodies that actually help or husband the infection, whether from a subsequent rogue jab or from another SARS variant (including the bio-weapon spiked varieties). hope that makes some sense.
“ Sod off”
You take your Britspeak and shove it where the sun don’t shine.
Come on. Who ya gonna believe? This little known scientist or Travis Kelce? Travis is a famous football player and Taylor Swift’s boyfriend you know. Isn’t that good enough for you?
A friend was diagnosed with a brain tumor a few months ago. He was proudly vaxed and now he’s dead.
Another friend has the same type of tumor. He’s alive and has a good prognosis.
Turbo cancer is real. The vax is the only common denominator
Since we call everything else a “she” (like boats, ships, cars, houses, etc..), then we should call them “she” too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.