Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Republic Party is the ANTI-Slavery Party!
self | July 14, 2023 | self

Posted on 07/14/2023 5:51:06 AM PDT by wintertime

Part of the Republican platform should be:

Republicans are the ANTI-Slavery party!

Republicans have been ANTI-Slavery since its founding!

It should be posted on every billboard in America. It should be a major part of every political ad.

It free money just waiting to be picked up.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: humantrafficking; politics; stavery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2023 5:51:06 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wintertime

The problem is that the Republican Party doesn’t fight.


2 posted on 07/14/2023 5:54:58 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Republicans have been ANTI-Slavery since its founding!

It was actually started to abolish slavery. It was the reason for its founding.

3 posted on 07/14/2023 6:02:55 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

The Democrat party is the party of slavery, internment camps, supported the KKK, eugenics, Jim Crowe, Dredd Scott, divisional racism, violence, racists, etc.


4 posted on 07/14/2023 6:03:10 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

And define for the dummy Dems the definition of the word anti.


5 posted on 07/14/2023 6:08:54 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Republicans have been ANTI-Slavery since its founding!

It should be posted on every billboard in America. It should be a major part of every political ad.


This would require that the Republican Party establishment not be composed of complacent idiots. Good luck ever getting that to happen.
6 posted on 07/14/2023 6:12:45 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Well, what you say is true. Lincoln was the first Republican and freed the slaves. He was murdered by an angry demotard.
But there is just one small problem.

Everyone knows that every single Republican and every single Democrat switched sides back in the ‘60s or something. Didn’t you know that?

It’s true, just ask any demotard.

So now they’re the ones that fought slavery, and we’re now the plantation owners. So that explains things nicely, no?


7 posted on 07/14/2023 6:28:11 AM PDT by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Joseph Hayne Rainey (June 21, 1832 – August 1, 1887) was an American politician. He was the first black person to serve in the United States House of Representatives and the second black person (after Hiram Revels) to serve in the United States Congress. His service included time as presiding officer of the House of Representatives. Born into a family of farmers and planters, Rainey was a member of the Republican Party.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Rainey

8 posted on 07/14/2023 6:33:39 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
“It was actually started to abolish slavery. It was the reason for its founding.”

The early Republican Party platform was to stop the expansion of slavery, not abolish it.

At least that is the way President Lincoln explained it.

The Democrat state of Georgia actually cast the decisive vote ratifying the 13th amendment.

9 posted on 07/14/2023 6:44:38 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

This ship sailed many, many years ago.

It could have been done, and done very effectively, but the Cabalists who run the Republican party did not want to do it precisely because it was such an incredibly effective truth.

And it is amazing that anyone on our side still does not understand the nature of the Republican party. That party has zero interest in representing our interests, and that also has been true for many, many years.


10 posted on 07/14/2023 6:45:48 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

I got booted from Twitter for saying that


11 posted on 07/14/2023 6:52:48 AM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem
Well sometimes you have to publicly understate your true goals. All of them were rather strong anti-slavery advocates. There true goal was to abolish slavery.. But realists know that you couldn't do it over night & you couldn't do it by being totally candid. There was already another party called the Free Soil party, who were all about prohibiting slavery in the western expansion territories of the country. So the Republican Party adopted their stance. The Free Soil party soon merged into the Republican Party.

So, you are technically correct, but they soon began advocating for the abolishment of slavery completely.

12 posted on 07/14/2023 7:24:57 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

I lost a good friend because I posted a meme on Fakebook exposing the Dems as the slavery party...


13 posted on 07/14/2023 7:44:51 AM PDT by goodnesswins ( We pretend to vote and they pretend to count the votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Really? The “new improved” Twitter? That’s just WRONG! Even FB hasn’t flagged me when I post it...


14 posted on 07/14/2023 7:47:11 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
“Well sometimes you have to publicly understate your true goals. All of them were rather strong anti-slavery advocates. There true goal was to abolish slavery.”

That is an interesting comment. For the purpose of this post I'll stipulate you are correct: It was the hidden intent of the Republican Party and Lincoln to abolish slavery.

There is evidence for this position in Lincoln's House Divided Speech. And elsewhere.

But Lincoln knew about the Constitution's super-majority requirement for an amendment to overthrow slavery.

Do you have any inkling how Lincoln intended to overthrow slavery without the necessary votes?

15 posted on 07/14/2023 10:32:55 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

If you think either party is a carbon-copy of what it was in 1860, you are sorely mistaken.

In 1860, the Democratic party was the party of low taxes, states’ rights and limited, decentralized government. Lincoln imposed the first income tax, gutted the Bill of Rights, stripped the states of their sovereignty, and created the blueprint for ceaselessly enlarging government the demoncrats still use to this day.


16 posted on 07/14/2023 11:18:17 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

I’m not sure even he knew, unless his intention was to provoke a Civil War. Some suggest the FDR did the same with Japan, knew that Peal Harbor was being planned & did nothing to stop it. All to change the mindset of Americans who predominately wanted to stay out of the conflict.


17 posted on 07/14/2023 11:24:44 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sarcazmo
Everyone knows that every single Republican and every single Democrat switched sides back in the ‘60s or something. Didn’t you know that?

Stop spreading incorrect information. Let's just look at one demographic. Black people.

In 1868, Blacks voted strictly Republican. Are you with me so far?

They kept voting Republican until 1932. Franklin Delanor Roosevelt claimed to be the president for poor people, and promised to do things for the poor. Well most blacks were poor and this message resonated with them, and for the first time in history, a large segment of blacks voted for the Democrat... and then kept voting for him for the next four elections.

But this wasn't a majority.

When LBJ came along, he promised a "War on Poverty", and he started sending government money to poor people, many of whom were blacks.

Black people started voting even more strongly Democrat, and by 1974, the vast majority of them were voting Democrat.

Now, they vote Democrat at a rate of 95%.

So do you deny any of what I have just told you? Did they switch from Republican to Democrat?

And it started in 1932, not the 1960s. The 1960s accelerated it, but it began in 1932.

18 posted on 07/14/2023 4:30:24 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
It was actually started to abolish slavery. It was the reason for its founding.

Which makes it very strange that they voted for an Amendment to the Constitution to make slavery permanent.

The Corwin Amendment passed the House (controlled by Republicans) by a 2/3rds margin in March of 1861, then it passed the Senate (Controlled by Republicans) by a 2/3rds margin a short time later.

First Republican President Lincoln called for the Amendment to be passed by the States in his first inaugural address.

Funny Republicans who voted for slavery. Why it's almost as if they were lying about what they wanted.

19 posted on 07/14/2023 4:33:45 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
There was already another party called the Free Soil party, who were all about prohibiting slavery in the western expansion territories of the country.

A funny thing about the "Free Soil Party." It was headquartered in New York City, New York. It was a thousand miles away from the "territories" that it was so concerned about.

Seems to me that if it was legit, it would have been headquartered in Kansas or Missouri or something, but New York City?

I now think it had a lot to do with this:


20 posted on 07/14/2023 4:37:01 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson