Posted on 06/23/2023 11:16:02 AM PDT by nickcarraway
The top two public health agencies in the United States conducted a joint study showing that the risk of developing autoimmune heart disease among the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is a shocking 13,200 percent higher than it is among the unvaccinated.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered that compared to the background risk in the general population, the risk of myocarditis is 133 times greater in those who took the mRNA injections from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna.
Genesis Gold Group
Researchers from several top universities and hospitals across America contributed to the study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Using data from the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the CDC and the FDA identified 1,626 cases of myocarditis, which were cross-checked to ensure the results comply with the CDC’s official definition of myocarditis.
Based on this, researchers determined that the most high-risk mRNA jab is the one produced by Pfizer-BioNTech, meaning this one is the most dangerous in terms of potential health effects.
The Pfizer jabs, according to the data provided to VAERS, caused 105.9 cases of myocarditis per million doses after the second injection in the male 16- and 17-year-old age and sex demographic. In the 12-15 age group for males, there were 70.7 cases of myocarditis per million doses following the second shot.
Top 3 Threats To Retirement Today The 18-24 male age group had the highest risk at 52.4 cases per million for Pfizer and 56.3 cases per million for Moderna. The median time to symptom onset was just two days for both jabs.
Since VAERS only captures around 1% of vaccine damage, what is the TRUE risk of autoimmune heart disease following covid injection? As previous studies have found, the vast majority of covid jab-related heart problems, around 82 percent, occur in males. In the vast majority of cases, around 96 percent, those who became inflicted with myocarditis had to be hospitalized, and in most cases were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
By the time of discharge, 87 percent of those hospitalized saw symptom resolution, at least initially. There is no telling what these people might suffer as the years go by, especially into older age.
Among the most commonly reported symptoms are:
Banner 970x250 - No Beef Crumbles
chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89 percent)
shortness of breath (30 percent)
abnormal ECG results (72 percent)
abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72 percent)
Recognizing the strong and undeniable link between covid jabs and heart disease, the CDC has commenced an active surveillance program for adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following these post-injection heart-related incidents.
Since the jabs have only been out since late December 2020, and really only started to get into people’s bodies well into 2021, there is still no long-term data to evaluate concerning the long-term impact of covid jab-related heart disease.
The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) are both advising that people with myocarditis refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, otherwise they could die suddenly on the field.
Only after normal ECG and other test results start to appear should a person afflicted with covid jab-related heart disease even think about resuming strenuous exercise.
3 Reasons to Transfer or Rollover Your Retirement Accounts Out of the Stock Market By the way, VAERS only captures as little as one percent of all vaccine-related injuries and deaths. So as shocking as these figures and percentages are, one must multiply them by a lot in order to gain a more accurate picture of the injury and death tolls from these injections.
Want to keep up with the latest news about the injury and death fallout from Operation Warp Speed? You can do so at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
WND.com
JamaNetwork.com
Newstarget.com
NATURAL NEWS
Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
It sounds like a Marilyn Manson song title.
0.o
/Cupid carries a mung
I think I’ll just not eat for a few days now.
/that post probably gagged some maggots
nitzy wrote: “There is quite a difference between “not 100%” and “no protection after 6 months”.”
Show me where there is zero protection after six months.
Then there is this study:
Interpretation: After 5 months, vaccine effectiveness remained high among individuals younger than 55 years. Booster doses restore vaccine effectiveness. Adverse reactions after booster doses were similar to those after the second dose. Homologous booster schedules had fewer reported systemic side-effects than heterologous boosters.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35405090/
“Effectiveness” in the article you just shared refers to protection against serious symptoms. It doesn’t refer to catching COVID as has been my point from the start of this discussion.
You CANNOT make the argument that myocarditis is less likely from the shot than from COVID. You could only make this argument if they were mutually exclusive and your options were between one OR the other.
That is not the case. You will still get COVID even if you get the shot.
Go ahead and move the goal posts again, shill.
a shocking 13,200 percent higher than it is among the unvaccinated.
That is what 133 times more likely works out to be.
Let’s round it down to only 100 times greater. That would not lessen my anxiety if I was a shot pin cushion.
The occurances per one million are still quite low per the CDC study. However, realize their reported numbers are based on the voluntary VAERS program, which captures only bout 1% of all cases.
In any event, I’m the one with myocarditis, it doesn’t matter to me what the percentages are.
“Effectiveness” in the article you just shared refers to protection against serious symptoms. It doesn’t refer to catching COVID as has been my point from the start of this discussion.
You CANNOT make the argument that myocarditis is less likely from the shot than from COVID. You could only make this argument if they were mutually exclusive and your options were between one OR the other.
That is not the case. You will still get COVID even if you get the shot.
Go ahead and move the goal posts again, shill.
nitzy wrote: “You CANNOT make the argument that myocarditis is less likely from the shot than from COVID. You could only make this argument if they were mutually exclusive and your options were between one OR the other.”
Not me making that argument. Heart org makes that claim.
I don’t care who is making the argument.
If you were a rational, logical person you could see that it is an invalid argument.
It would be like me arguing that the risk of cancer from radiation is worse than the risk of cancer from cigarettes. Therefore, I recommend everyone should smoke if they think they may accidentally be exposed to radiation.
The two things have nothing to do with one another. Smoking cigarettes doesn’t prevent you from getting exposed to radiation and getting the shot doesn’t prevent you from getting Covid.
By smoking or taking the shot you are only INCREASING your risk since you are accepting the risk of both the thing you are doing intentionally AND the thing that is happening unintentionally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.