Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westinghouse unveils small modular nuclear reactor
Reuters ^ | May 4, 202310:34 AM CDT | By Timothy Gardner

Posted on 05/04/2023 9:05:00 AM PDT by Red Badger

WASHINGTON, May 4 (Reuters) - U.S. company Westinghouse unveiled plans on Thursday for a small modular reactor to generate virtually emissions-free electricity that could replace coal plants or power water desalinization and other industries.

Rita Baranwal, the Westinghouse Electricity Co's top technology officer, said the reactor, dubbed AP300 for its planned 300 Megawatt capacity, will not use special fuels or liquid metal coolants unlike some other next-generation reactors.

It will be a smaller version of its AP1000 reactor, several of which are operating in China, and which are ramping up in Georgia at the Vogtle plant, after years of delay and billions of dollars over budget.

Despite hurdles for new nuclear, Baranwal was confident. "We've kept it simple, designed it on demonstrated and licensed technology, and I think that's one of the advantages that we have with this concept," she told Reuters in an interview. Westinghouse, owned by Brookfield Business Partners (BBU.N), plans to start constructing the reactor by 2030 and have it running by 2033.

Small modular reactors (SMR) are meant to fit new applications such as replacing shut coal plants and being located in more remote communities. President Joe Biden's administration believes that maintaining existing nuclear plants and developing next-generation reactors is crucial for its goal of decarbonizing the economy by 2050.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; History; Science
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Tell It Right

“I want them small enough to power individual homes and cars. “

Engineering and economically impossible.


41 posted on 05/04/2023 10:33:34 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“a small modular reactor to generate virtually emissions-free electricity”

Emissions FREE???

It only emits the most deadly substance known to man, that won’t be safe for 100,000 years.

People are so stupid.


42 posted on 05/04/2023 10:35:03 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

It emits Liberalism?..................


43 posted on 05/04/2023 10:40:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Late to the game and relying alot on mere scaled down versions of older nuclear power methods to try to gain speedier approvals and thwart much more holistic newer designs from getting investment and market shares. It is merely a scaled down light water reactor process, where fail safe safey relies on the combination of the cooling water not getting contaminated and if contaminated not leaking (Fukishima).

Much newer SMR (small nuclear reactor) designs do not use the light water method and do not have the issues that come with possible contaminated coolant water leaks.


44 posted on 05/04/2023 10:41:45 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL


45 posted on 05/04/2023 10:47:56 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"President Joe Biden's administration believes that maintaining existing nuclear plants and developing next-generation reactors is crucial for its goal of decarbonizing the economy by 2050."

Bait and switch.....

Support modular nukes as pretense for shutting down fossil fuel plants.

After fossil fuel plants are shut down, then prohibit the nukes and leave us with nothing.......Population Control tool # 19.

46 posted on 05/04/2023 10:51:12 AM PDT by G Larry ( DEI = Division + Erroneous Indoctrination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
"It only emits the most deadly substance known to man, that won’t be safe for 100,000 years."

In less than 10,000 years it is less radioactive than the mined ore.


47 posted on 05/04/2023 10:54:26 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Burkes most likely have two gas turbines.

GE sells gas turbines as large as 500 MW to utilities. That won’t fit in a destroyer.


48 posted on 05/04/2023 10:57:15 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

“The Burkes most likely have two gas turbines.”

That is the total output of FOUR turbines.


49 posted on 05/04/2023 10:58:39 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Misleading headline - only plans revealed, not the actual thing.


50 posted on 05/04/2023 11:03:37 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Me: “I want them small enough to power individual homes and cars. “
TexasGator: "Engineering and economically impossible."

Then I have little interest in them. The Dims have made it clear that they will eventually find reason to suppress energy sources for the grid. It's only a matter of them dreaming up an excuse.

51 posted on 05/04/2023 11:15:57 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Never happen...
The communists who rule us will never allow it...

Our masters absolutely require that the serfs be starving, cold in the winter, unable to travel anywhere not in walking distance (except for the children to travel 2-hours a day in school buses), and need impossible levels of night vision when the sun sets...


52 posted on 05/04/2023 11:20:39 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And the windfarm behind the solar panels a ways.


53 posted on 05/04/2023 11:54:21 AM PDT by Ellendra (A single lie on our side does more damage than a thousand lies on their side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“I want them small enough to power individual homes and cars. “

Engineering and economically impossible.


For now.
54 posted on 05/04/2023 12:00:37 PM PDT by Ellendra (A single lie on our side does more damage than a thousand lies on their side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The anti-electricity woo-woos (you know who I mean) aren’t going to like this.


55 posted on 05/04/2023 12:01:05 PM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

Oh yeah! I missed that. It’s way off in the distance!............


56 posted on 05/04/2023 12:02:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Finally ....good news on the energy front.


57 posted on 05/04/2023 12:05:09 PM PDT by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

“For now.”

For never.


58 posted on 05/04/2023 12:05:56 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I could see a series of these powering desalination and pumping stations to bring clean water to the Colorado river from the Pacific. In similar fashion, water from the Gulf of Mexico could be pumped to lakes and reservoirs in New Mexico, Colorado, and western parts of the plains.


59 posted on 05/04/2023 12:16:57 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

“I could see a series of these powering desalination and pumping stations to bring clean water to the Colorado river from the Pacific. “

Why pump it to the Colorado only be returned to California?

Use it in California and eliminate California’s draw on the Colorado.


60 posted on 05/04/2023 12:55:31 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson