Skip to comments.
Keith Olbermann notes the Second Amendment doesn’t protect the right to own a firearm
Twitchy.com ^
| April 20, 2023
Posted on 04/21/2023 7:13:11 AM PDT by lowbridge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: lowbridge
“Keith, you’re an idiot.”
Of course he is,as well as being an idiot.🤔
21
posted on
04/21/2023 7:38:23 AM PDT
by
BiteYourSelf
( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
To: lowbridge
There should be anamandment to protect Americans from the likes of Keith Olberman.
22
posted on
04/21/2023 7:39:19 AM PDT
by
Shady
(The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
To: Bon of Babble
I am surprised that no one has yet smeared Keith Olbermann with honey and staked him to an ant hill until he gets wise. I note that the Bill of Rights does not specifically prohibit that.
To: lowbridge
KO doesn’t keep or bear a single brain cell.
24
posted on
04/21/2023 7:41:07 AM PDT
by
CarmichaelPatriot
(Recovering Kalifornian... Loving Alabama!)
To: lowbridge
The Founders didn’t use the word “own” because they didn’t anticipate anyone as stupid as Olberman being in public life.
L
25
posted on
04/21/2023 7:41:14 AM PDT
by
Lurker
( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: BiteYourSelf
26
posted on
04/21/2023 7:41:42 AM PDT
by
BiteYourSelf
( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
To: lowbridge
Hey A-Hole how come the first amendment does not say TV or Radio.
27
posted on
04/21/2023 7:44:03 AM PDT
by
pas
To: lowbridge
Why don’t they start going house to house confiscating them?
Pick any street in America and send deputies door to door to seize the firearms.
See what happens.
To: lowbridge
” ... the right OF THE PEOPLE to KEEP and bears arms shall NOT be infringed”.
It’s very clear.
29
posted on
04/21/2023 7:50:34 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: lowbridge
30
posted on
04/21/2023 7:50:34 AM PDT
by
Leep
(Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
To: Gnome1949
"Pick any street in America and send
deputies Keith Olbermann door to door to seize the firearms."
Even better.
To: lowbridge
He probably thought he was so smart about that too lol
32
posted on
04/21/2023 7:52:36 AM PDT
by
HollyB
To: lowbridge
When I keep something it’s usually because I own it
33
posted on
04/21/2023 7:54:35 AM PDT
by
Nifster
( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
To: ConservativeMind
34
posted on
04/21/2023 7:55:43 AM PDT
by
Nifster
( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
To: lowbridge
Keep and Bear arms does not just imply ownership but further implies the right to carry them about where one goes and keep them in one's possession. If they had merely said "own arms" the 2nd Amendment would have been much weaker, the gun grabbers would say, hey you can own it, but you can't take it out of a gun safe, or you have to keep it in a secure licensed gun bank and maybe go look at it behind a wall of glass on Sundays...but you can't carry it about.
To: lowbridge
So we can “keep and bear” them but we cannot own them?
That makes total sense.
To: lowbridge
Maybe Olberman would like to turn in any guns he or his body guards own before he throws any more stones...
37
posted on
04/21/2023 7:59:58 AM PDT
by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.for corruptiion)
did this guy bump his head or something....
38
posted on
04/21/2023 8:08:55 AM PDT
by
basalt
(qb's)
To: lowbridge
The first amendment doesn’t say anything about radio, television or the internet. So does that mean that it does not apply there? The 4th Amendment doesn’t say anything about privacy. 5th Amendment has no language for a free attorney.
However, if you do a language analysis, the consistency of “the people” throughout the Constitution and the Bill of Rights means, Individual people as private citizens. Otherwise, every other amendment suddenly changes to only mean the people in terms of the people as a whole in the form of a government.
And, the government has no need to guarantee the right of itself to keep armaments. There is already a clause in the constitution about keeping and maintaining a navy and an army. Governments have always kept arms. There is little to no redundancy in the Constitution, so why would it exist here?
39
posted on
04/21/2023 8:13:00 AM PDT
by
GeorgianaCavendish
(Beam me up Scotty. There's no sign of intelligent life down here.)
To: lowbridge
If the Founders had said ‘own,’ dumb mofos like Olbermann would be arguing the 2nd only guarantees our right to own firearms, not keep and bear them. SHUT UP KEITH!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson