Posted on 01/05/2023 6:44:16 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
Let’s get right to the crux of one of the worst sporting tragedies in recent memory and especially so given the context of a highly anticipated Monday night NFL game, which is averaging 14.8 million viewers in 2022: If Damar Hamlin were NOT vaccinated/boosted for COVID-19, it would be plastered all over every newscast and newspaper in America. But that is NOT not the case. What does that tell us? It says that what they’re not saying speaks volumes.
I was reminded of this by longtime Moonshine contributor, Wall St., who sent me this message in-part: “I learned from listening to lying management CEOs/CFOs. If they don’t even address the elephant in the room then the elephant is far bigger than you think and most of the other people in the room won’t ever figure out there even is an elephant until after they’ve lost their money.”
I’ve seen a bunch of Damar Hamlin coverage and my first concern goes to him and his family as do my prayers, but the elephant in this room is not only being completely ignored, they’re trying to throw a rug over the top of it as if no one will see. That’s absurd.
Perhaps most concerning and to my point is that federal authorities have converged on Hamlin’s hospital. Narrative and unavoidable fall-out control is important and those feds have a job to do. That’s sinister.
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalmoonshine.substack.com ...
“I have been jabbed and one booster. I have not been sick”
You need to double down and give “science” a better chance to damage you!
Well, isn't that special.
I prefer doctors who are against fraudulent drugs that do not do what they initially claimed were the benefits of the "vaccine". I prefer doctors who denounce the need to redefine the long established definition of the word vaccine, only because these "vaccines" didn't meet the definition of a vaccine whatsoever. I prefer doctors who look into the "vaccines" with a critical eye to examine the actual efficacy & effectiveness of what is being giving to people.
Can you prove that the "vaccines" saved even one life?
Of course you can't. Just as I can't claim that they didn't save even one life.
I can attest that it didn't prevent the spread, as well as, attest to the fact that it didn't prevent hospitalizations or deaths. Because all three have been proven that vaccinated people were capable of spreading the virus, and were also hospitalized with some dying.
Don't know what kind of doctor you are, but let's just say I am not impressed in the least that you are a doctor. If you were my doctor, I would immediately replace you.
Even CAT scan?
Why can’t you post the whole article?
Yes. even CT and MRI
And I would be Ok with you replacing me. I don’t mind that you are not impressed with me. Have a nice day
The powers that be have backed themselves into a corner. They have a huge conundrum to deal with. On one hand, if they admit that the vax had some cause in the injury, their lie is exposed. On the other hand, if the commotio corditis hypothesis is accepted, then professional football, as we know it is dead. How many multi billion stadiums do you thin, will be filled with flag football fans?
Might also indicate that since Hamlin had his arrest in a place where got excellent, immediate care that there's a real chance for a good outcome.
Yes, but is it snake venom?
Running around in pads can cause cardiac arrest. Particularly if you have heart disease
It’s the way my dad died at age 54
Course he was a drunk and smoked cigarettes for a lot of years
It happens
I’ve had one shot and one booster. No side effects here or for anyone that I know who has taken the shot
I’m healthy and plan on staying so
Free Republic does not allow you to post more than 300 words of an article.
Excellent, well reasoned out article.
Thanks for posting this.
It’s a blog. You can post the whole thing. There is a list of sites you must excerpt. Blogs aren’t on the list.
How is it different from anonymous internet posters who claim they are doctors who make a diagnosis of a person without having actually, physically examined him in person?
I have had doctors tell me they will only diagnose with in person visits as doing without physically examining the patient is bad medical practice.
And yet we have those here on FR, anonymous internet posters, claiming to be doctors, who provide no credentials, and yet dispense medical advice that sometimes results in the passing of a FReeper, as happened to poor Terart.
And that’s better?
Seriously?????? We’re supposed to take someone’s word for their credentials based on what? Their ability to talk medicalese? Their say so?
That alone, everything else aside, is enough to tell me this was not just an unfortunate commotio cordis incident.
—> I love when non clinical folks diagnose individuals that they have never laid eyes upon.
Since I don’t charge for the diagnoses, it works well.
What are your symptoms… and remember, there’s no charge!
I love when non clinical folks diagnose individuals that they have never laid eyes upon.
That happens a LOT, here, with the FRoctors and $hot $hills.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.