Posted on 12/01/2022 11:09:11 AM PST by Brookhaven
During my "dating career" as a man living in North America I couldn't help noticing that women often have unrealistic expectations. They see themselves being passed around by those high quality men they feel entitled for, failing to realize those few men are in high demand. Time passes, options shrink, their standards don't change and they wonder why they are still single.
The stats can prove there're not enough high quality men for every girl out there.
The Female Delusion Calculator is a tool that can help women discern what is realistic from what is highly unlikely.
(Excerpt) Read more at igotstandardsbro.com ...
Either you get it, or you don't get it. There's no explaining ... I'm a fan of everything from head to toe, front, sides, and back.
Amen. Take the "hot" chart. That's cute for FR posts, but hopefully it's not something to go by. Often a "hot" woman means she dresses worldly and likes to flirt with a lot of men to get attention -- something you don't want a wife to do. So our culture messes up men by making us want a woman that's more trouble than she's worth.
But then ... LOL ... there's the sexual behavior study done years ago that showed that the people who reported having sex the most frequently, reported being happier with the sex lives, and the women who reported attaining the Big O the most frequently LOL, are the people who reported all 3 of these characteristics:
1. Christian
2. married
3. attend church regularly
LOL
That study was called something like "The Socialization of Sexuality" and is the only large (read high power) sexual behavior study ever done that wasn't trying to solve a problem among a limited subculture of the U.S. (i.e. HPV among college-aged women, or AIDS among young black makes, or ED among vets, etc.). If you look at most sexual behavior studies there isn't much data except that one particular demographic some doctor has identified a problem among and asked the NIH for research funds for. The Socialization study is the only one in which the researchers just wanted to know what all sexual behaviors were going on in our country without trying to solve a problem, just see what's happening among everybody young and old or somewhere in between, black or white or somewhere in between, rich or poor or somewhere in between, east cost or west coast or somewhere in between, etc.
If you look at any other study's reporting and it describes general trends in sexual behavior without telling you which narrow demographic it's about, you're reading a lie masquerading as science because the other studies didn't collect data across all demographics like that one study did. In fact, the last research study I worked on just happened to be a sexual behavior study about getting the word out of the danger of AIDS to young black males in urban areas. I always keep an eye out to see if anyone claims data from it to point to general trends for middle-aged white rural women to "be aware of how much their husband cheats on them" or whatever LOL, but so far I haven't seen anyone bastardize that data like they have other research studies.
never understood the fascination with oversized breasts. Don’t men understand the effects of gravity over time?
Yep. My wife and I meet all three of your numbered points and, yep...
The probability a guy meets your standards is: 0.37%
They usually add "Must not be a Republican" - which takes the percentage down to 0.00037% :)
In all seriousness, it's amazing that us Christians sit back and let the worldly people do all the talking about sex like they know what they're talking about when for the most part they have more trouble getting their Love Boat out of dry dock. Us Christians ought to talk about the joys of married sex more often, particularly if we can find a way to do so without betraying our spouse's privacy. An argument could be made that the world is in the mess it's in in part because we've been too quiet and haven't educated people on how best to get what many folks want most (sex) by doing it God's way. Us leaving that void in the discussion is part of what makes worldly hedonism so attractive (because it's the only voice about sex).
There is one, and it's equally as brutal.
If you don't believe me, CLICK HERE and see for yourself.
I tried it for giggles. Came up 3.98% chance of finding the woman of my dreams.
Damn' good thing I met her before this thing came out. If I'd put any stock into the legitimacy of these things I'd have given up and not even tried.
Generally that’s correct.
However my worst two disasters were right out of church.
The one I described earlier was a regular choir member, was at church every Sunday twice. But she had a horrible home life and that was her major influence.
The first one......well, we’ll be here for two hours.....so.......
And the good news is, depending on time and circumstances, they all do - for about 30 minutes.
I played around with the controls, there ...
For the “male delusion calculator” preferring women who are not overweight excludes a lot, and preferring women who are not unwed mothers excludes 10x more. In the age range I might be looking if I were suddenly single.
FWIW.
Who is being superficial?
😂 a realist walks among us.
I was going to say:
1. 5’3”
2. Double D
3. Long blond hair
4. Stick thin
5. Has a speech impediment. Can’t say no.
6. Owns a Bass boat
7. Loves cheap beer
Everybody has preferences.
Most women prefer a man who is taller than them. A 5’ tall woman with that preference will have an easier time satisfying it than would a 6’ tall woman with that preference.
Most men prefer a woman who is shorter than them. A 6’ tall man with that preference will have an easier time satisfying it than would a 5’ tall man with that preference.
Some people don’t particularly care about the relative heights of themselves and their love interests.
It is a statistical fact that on average, in America, men are taller than women.
80% of divorces are initiated by the wife.
The stereotype that men, as a group, dump their wives for a younger model isn’t true.
The calculator is flawed, in that it does not offer a visible wide range for age, income, height or weight, but only what its algorithm dictates. Nor can a user select two races instead of just one or all three.
It’s either a good start or just a fun party game.
Hmmm ...
5’5”
DD
Proportioned accordingly
Long auburn hair
Can’t say no
Loves Bourbon
35 years ago.
Getting old ain’t for cowards.
Wouldn’t trade her for anyone.
Or anything.
Ever.
Since we’re all anonymous here, I’ll just throw it out: We were married when we were both 44 (we’re only six days apart). for the first ten years, it was at least once a day, and we had a fun phrase on road trips - “Do you want to pull off and scare some deer?” We scared a lot of deer, and probably a few Racoons.
But the point is it is REALLY about intimacy. There is a closeness that quite literally fuels a man’s inspiration and motivation when he is desired by his wife. And the fact that it is ONLY the two of you creates an incredible bond. If I ever cheated on her it would be like killing the golden goose, even if she never found out, because I would know.
Note, we are now almost 69 and it’s less than once a day now...
0.37% = 37/10,000 or only 1 in every 270 men.
I’d bet most men would stay married if they were allowed to screw around women in general are not going to stand for a cheating husband even if they have cut him off
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.