|
Posted on 11/20/2022 5:11:35 PM PST by ransomnote
Have you seen President Trump's powerful 4 minute video message? Don't miss it!
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Amen.
5.56mm
I post some but not all of them on Facebook.
mark
Every person who gets redpilled will then try to inform others. It’s catching!
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/20/2022 Vol.435, Q Day 1849, RitaOK wrote: Are we sacrificing something more than apart from freedom to remain in the proverbial sense of “fat, fed and warm” while typing at will?
I certainly included myself in my own critique, lording myself over No One,and always “speaking for myself”.
Blowing past my point seems your forte; 1) that Americans are suffering little to nothing (compared to EU, for only one example); and 2) that “YET” means that when you DO become affected, things will Change, and Americans will react as a united people (off our netherregion and in the town squares); and 3) that the MIL will see a people gathered behind them, enough to risk themselves.
Is there some problem with expressing a “belief”, that you and your other thought monitor should take only what I say, so personally?
If less is more, and info-warfare is Cost Free, but very “educational and informational”, then perhaps we could do even Less— for the war effort. Think how much smarter we will be.
Is there some problem with expressing a “belief”, that you and your other thought monitor should take only what I say, so personally?
I apologize for combining two posts into one - I combined my objection to your criticizing FReeQs with my opinion about the 'town square' tactic and military.
I certainly included myself in my own critique, lording myself over No One,and always “speaking for myself”.
No. In the prior critique of FReeQs you placed yourself above us and ignored my questions asking what it was that elevated you above us. You repeatedly referred to FReeQ listlessness and unwillingness to volunteer, while you were posting on a thread of volunteers.
If you were asked to describe yourself, you wouldn't describe yourself that way. You wouldn't say, "I'm too lazy to get off the sofa and lumber down to my polling station". Nor would you say of yourself, "I'm fat, fed, and warm. I'm not sacrificing anything for the cause of freedom. I mostly preen about my brilliance, the substacks I prefer, and what I think I “know”"
Some people write "I include myself" or "we" to set up a defense when criticizing others. Based on your posting, you want to 'motivate' people to do what you think best and 'lumber down' to polling stations instead of posting on FR, or demonstrate for Brazil. You seem to want us to perceive ourselves as unworthy of respect if we do not do as you wish. Your choice of motivational techniques is anchored by ridicule.
This time you technically included yourself. However, once again, you make zero effort to do anything about the problem you see. You don't leave to support those efforts - you stay here and criticize 'us' for not doing them.
It would be just your opinion if you said, for example, "I really believe that we should be supporting Brazil and here's why..." or "Do you think we should..." "See, I think that the problem is that we're too comfortable..." But instead we get a laundry list of our supposed negative attributes if we do not do as you believe we must. The same occurred with your prior ridicule which eliminates contributions ('typing) and delivers insults to those who don't do as you say.
Are we sacrificing something more than apart from freedom to remain in the proverbial sense of “fat, fed and warm” while typing at will?
Your use of 'typing at will' indicates that we all should believe as you do, that our information warfare efforts are fake and useless. You've already explained your opinion of information warfare as it is conducted by FReeQS; your need to repeatedly tell us we're doing nothing here but "typing at will", that FReeQ contributions to information are worthless or imaginary, is certainly demotivating and is a commonly repeated accusation among forum trolls.
Though most likely do not agree with you, why else would they remain, you continue to repeat the assertion. I ask why you're here if you think so little of what we do; in the resulting silence, I conclude you want us to leave the thread.
I wouldn't stay among people you descibe.
Is there some problem with expressing a “belief”, that you and your other thought monitor should take only what I say, so personally?
Your original post was barbed, and pointing to FReeQs. When confronted, you focus only on 'America'.
"We’re fat, fed and warm, sacrificing nothing for their cause, mostly preening about our brilliance, the substacks we prefer, and what we think we “know”. 🧐
(Self included.)"That quote describes more of your prior voiced opinions about FReeQs than it does about America. Your statements about our supposed laziness. pointless posting ('typing at will), 'what we think we know' etc have diffused into the Q thread over time. Many of us don't agree with your opinion that we are just 'typing' and avoiding opportunities to support our country, our president, our patriots etc.
You refuse to accept that many of us have a separate opinion about 'typing' and continue to criticize us for doing so, with epithets (e.g., preening, lazy etc.).
Well done. Is there any way to share your memes?
“I wish you had pulled back from privately asking me to try to get myself a timeout by Admin Mod in order to show ‘solitarity’ with those battling trolls.”
From EasySt | 09/27/2022 9:33:01 PM
“It’s not a good look.”
~~~~~~~
Is RitaOK is a troll? Or a troll battler to be excommunicated?
Like me, I guess.
I didn’t clearly remember asking you to try to get yourself a timeout to show
solidarity with those battling trolls, but knowing how impressive MQD doing
such a thing would be, I’m sure I must have. I most certainly WOULD have
suggested such a thing in a debate of such issues.
(And joined the epic fight to get you right back, after, if they dared.)
~Easy
That’s a shame. Your meme’s are so good they should be shared far and wide.
I think it’s more about being a team player. We can have differing opinions but should have the same goals or go play somewhere else.
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas!
How honorable of you.
It won’t take my vote, but it shows me the results for a flash.
If you had it to do over again, knowing what you know now, would you get vaccinated for COVID-19?
Yes: 13.2%
No: 86.8%
146,994 votes
14 hours left
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/20/2022 Vol.435, Q Day 1849, EasySt wrote: “I wish you had pulled back from privately asking me to try to get myself a timeout by Admin Mod in order to show ‘solitarity’ with those battling trolls.”
From EasySt | 09/27/2022 9:33:01 PM
“It’s not a good look.”
~~~~~~~
Is RitaOK is a troll? Or a troll battler to be excommunicated?
Like me, I guess.
I didn’t clearly remember asking you to try to get yourself a timeout to show
solidarity with those battling trolls, but knowing how impressive MQD doing
such a thing would be, I’m sure I must have. I most certainly WOULD have
suggested such a thing in a debate of such issues.
(And joined the epic fight to get you right back, after, if they dared.)~Easy
RitaOK was not named in the email(s) you referenced, nor part of my responses to your emails or prior post.
We weren't debating - you sent me three emails of 'advice' you thought I needed to hear. Today you referred to one of them saying "This is the sort of thing I tried to pull you back from, privately, MQD," and I pointed out that in those same emails you also advised me to try to get Admin Mod to give me a time out (re 'take a stand' against limitations of posting Q on the forum.) So I can't turn to you for advice.
I explained what I meant when I asked ritaOK why she's here in two of today's posts - it differs from your interpretation. I accept you do not agree.
Let's agree to disagree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
