Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[Magnatron]

Don’t engage in Q theory and practice…

Wow…

So I’m now a follower of Q?

Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote.

Bags, can you help with that?

[grey_whiskers]

I am tired of being explaining why I object to whacky, false and easily disproved claims. You well know it is because I am firmly anti-mandate and such nonsense undermines that cause. Secondly, all these claims about preposterous things like nano octopuses, wiggly little parasites, itty bitty razor blades, nabobots that enable mind control via 5G, etc., make us look like bunch of kooks if no one disputes them from our side.

You're lying again.

You falsely present ALL opposition to the jabs as though it is inspired by the most radical, unsubstantiated claims. Like this post.

And perform massive ad hominem attacks both against doctors going against the jabs, like this post:

All this crazy fake garbage obscures the valid reasons and hurts the anti-mandate cause. I am interested in facts and the truth. These vax doomer blogs are very, very short on both and very, very long on scaremongering, bad math, bad science and grifting.

and this post:

And while they call us "$hot$hill" and "paid Pfizer troll" for disagreeing with their bogus claims about tiny razor blades in the vaccines, etc., the vax doomer grifters rake in millions. And they (and apparently at one time perhaps the Russians) recruit paid vax doomer "influencers": https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57928647

and this post:

It’s their goal to drive all who question their bogus claims off FR and turn this place into one giant Special Q Thread. They openly brag about that, even on the main board, and crow over running off good longtime Freepers. They apparently can’t stand any criticism of these bogus claims, but rather than keeping them on their Special Q Thread where they would be protected from critical analysis of these claims, they post them on the main board, including on threads totally unrelated to Covid. Then get all nasty if anyone challenges them. They aren’t content with what they have been given and want the whole enchillada.

Stuff it.

[bagster]

You are one of the first to ask my opinion

Like that's ever stopped you from bloviating your uninformed opinion. Trying to get you to stop would be like standing on the tracks of the stupid train as it bears down on you.

[CatHerd]

I’ve never posted about “Q theory” but it is true that the more um ... interesting ... claims about weird objects in the vaccines, etc., were posted here by Q followers, along with conspiracy theories about Covid not being a real virus, the illness was really caused by vaccines “they” snuck into other vaccines before the “plandemic” so people received the vaccines unawares and then got sick from them, not the supposedly nonexistent virus, and on and on. And then took great offense and viciously attacked anyone who disagreed with these theories. It is what it is.

[grey_whiskers]

It’s a strawman. Fortunately I have a bic lighter handy, so to speak.

Get rekt, lying troll.

[grey_whiskers]

It’s the difference between repeating and understanding info.

And every time you follow either the herd, or your paymasters, or whatever it is, in attempting to talk about Q and link it to "disinformation" on the clot shots, you demonstrate your complete inability to do so on that topic.

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles, Magnatron wrote:

Don’t engage in Q theory and practice…

Wow…

So I’m now a follower of Q?

Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote.

Bags, can you help with that?

You want it in silver or gold? Bags has the 'platinum' edition.

Basically, vax pushers lost the barfight to suppress the truth about Covid "vaccine" harm awhile ago, and now they are just throwing ash trays and calling names. Even Drudge is giving up; currently the banner headline is 'NEW COVID BOOSTERS NOT EVEN TESTED' even though the linked article is all vax-pushy.

[Magnatron]

Bags has the 'platinum' edition.

Ummm…

I think the platinum edition apparently gets you thrown off Free Republic from time to time.

I’ll take whatever’s below that.

[grey_whiskers]

Take the graphene oxide version!

[bagster]

Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote. Bags, can you help with that?

Of course I can. I'll move you to the top of the list.

Would you be interested in the latest tinfoil hat model? We call it the 'stingy brim'.

[bagster]

I think the platinum edition apparently gets you thrown off Free Republic from time to time.

You bet your John Brown mind it does.

Might even get you sued by hyperactive mental patients.

[gas_dr]

When an overwhelming minority of a profession of learned scholars and advanced degree holders who are trained in scientific method are what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

But there are fringes in every profession. The problem with you pining ransom note and Jane is that there is only one conclusion in their and your view. None of you are particularly open to any other explanations It is this that is contradictory to scientific method.

But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

Thank you for your consideration and adherence to the rules of the forum.

[grey_whiskers]

But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

That is INDIRECT engagement between you and them; I ping those people so they can find what I wrote.

[bagster]

...what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

Probly time to take a porn break, gassie. You're getting overexcited again.

[gas_dr]

A distinction without difference.
You are bringing the engagement. I politely request you follow the rules. They weee not mentioned in the post. They are more than capable of searching your posts.

I assume you in good faith wish to abide the rules. If not, so be it

[CatHerd]

I’m glad it’s died down and your job is safe! The mandates were outrageous and really got my hackles up. Yay for you and standing your ground.

I almost never watch TV, and when I do it’s something like a Jane Austen movie or a nature documentary on Amazon Prime (blush), so I haven’t seen the Pfizer commercials. It’s weird, isn’t it? Still hoping to squeeze out a few more $?

Or maybe they hope the scaremongering about a surge in the fall will increase demand? I have my doubts it will be by much, though. As I wrote in my #400 above:

“Everybody is sick and tired of hearing about Covid, of lockdowns, and only a pitiful few are really worried about the new kinder, gentler Omicron variants. Besides, we’ve nearly all already had the Omicron.”

We’ll see. I certainly hope they don’t succeed with the scaremongering this time around!

[bagster]

None of you are particularly open to any other explanations.

Haha, look who's talking.

But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

Nothing gets poor gassie to spaz out spasmodically more than pinging Ransomnote and (especially) Jane Long. (pinging them out of FR etiquette rule #69 subsection Q).

Like as if they aren't reading each post on this thread already.

Wee gassie still has nightmares from the numerous whoopin's them two laid upon him his tender bottom. His therapist recommended he not even look at their typed names. It triggers him somethin' fierce.

His lawyers have also been in consultation.

#MentalHealthTakesAVillage

[metmom]

They will anyways.

No amount of real doctor data makes any difference to those with an agenda.

If they can’t refute the facts, they’ll just commit character assassination.

ANYTHING but admit they were wrong.

[Jane Long]

Excellent meme.

[grey_whiskers]

When an overwhelming minority of a profession of learned scholars and advanced degree holders who are trained in scientific method are what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

"Hang your hard on" ? Stop typing with one hand, troll.

Science is never determined by consensus. You gave away game, set, and match right there.

Counterexample: Lister.

Counterexample: "More doctors smoke Camel than any other cigarette"

Counterexample: Heliobacter and ulcers.

Counterexample: Ivermectin and the FDA posts public service ads "Stop it. You are not a horse."

$hot $hill$. If an OTC was found good enough, the whole tens of billions of dollars for EUA goes out the window: and the chance of establishing a miraculous bridgehead to use mRNA based shots for everything under the sun going forward.

Get rekt. The authorities were lying about everything under the sun in every possible way from the beginning of this.

And by defying established protocols, e.g. 10-year periods to look at jabs for side effects, ignoring or losing or reclassifying side effects reported to VAERS and allowing more deaths reported to VAERS in less than a year, than reported for all real vaccines combined over 30 years, re-defining the very meaning of the word vaccine, totally unnecessary lockdowns and masking, overlooking protocols which saved patients on ventilators (which I posted to you personally) and to which you replied (literal exact cut-and-paste):

"An OTC for sickle cell? Ok. I am game to hear what saved 85% of patients. On ventilators. I am really really sure there was no such critter Strike Three"

Source

Sticking your nose in the air and saying "I am always right, because DOCTOR!" (either on your own behalf, or the medical establishment, or Pfauci/Pfizer/Moderna) is not gonna work.

Even aside from the well known reproducibility problem in medicine.

We KNOW the establishment is lying beyond any of our darkest nightmares of 5 years ago.

We KNOW that Big Pharma has its hand up the FDA's rear like a puppet.

We KNOW that some of the non profit groups countering "Vax disinformation" (a Marxist neologism, like "TERF"), are also doing "climate change disinformation". We KNOW the Climate Change pushers, tried to professionally ruin the careers of those upsetting the apple cart.

So trying to say "see, they're not real scientists, or they're not recognized, or not peer review" or even "lied about working at Baylor" isn't gonna cut it. If you were honest, you'd have posted his side of that story too.

The jab pushers, and those defending them credibility left, not even a shred of it.

And those who "praise with faint damns" the jab pushers, while using strawmen on those pushing against the jabs, no matter what sanctimonious excuses they hide behind, have chosen their side: if they were honest they would be LOUDLY pushing the most rigorous of the evidence against the jabs, instead of alternating between hiding that evidence, shooting the messenger, and pompously and fatuously pushing mere credentialism.

Get stuffed.