All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

substack.com ^ | June 10, 2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

[ransomnote]

A few days ago I posted an article suggesting the mRNA vaccines were causing a spike in disability. Since that time the story has gone viral, I’ve had more time to look at the data, others have as well, and I now feel the case is very strong. Because this message is critically important, I am writing a second follow up article on the topic. In this article I will attempt to present a comprehensive analysis, and put the data into context with my experience of having worked with individuals with COVID vaccine injuries and individuals with varying degrees of disability including those seeking disability.

The initial discover of this dataset was Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout). He shared this dataset (which can be verified here):

Let’s quickly annotate that to put it into context:

 

MORE AT LINK: All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

 

[stevio]

Why?

[Chickensoup]

From 30800 to 32600 in thousands

8 percent?

significant but not overwhelming

[Chickensoup]

Election day games

[CatHerd]

Ah, Pierre Korey’s substack. Remember when ivermectin did not prevent Dr. Korey from getting Covid?

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/95726

Is he still raking in the bucks over at FLCC?

As for Uttar Pradesh, Korey’s claims are demolished here by Dr. Nick Mark of the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle:

https://youtu.be/d17pAo6S2MU?t=1443

Money quotes:

“While there are claims that the state began using ivermectin in May 2021, during the height of India’s COVID-19 crisis, the government actually said it began giving the drug in August 2020.”

“Not only did it not hasten the end of that alpha wave, but it didn’t prevent the delta wave.”

Dr. Mark also cited research where scientists looked at data for all deaths in India, and found that certain populous districts in Uttar Pradesh had no reported deaths at all for several months.

“So either you have to believe that ivermectin prevents you from dying of everything — car crashes, cancer, homicide, suicide — or, that the data is just garbage and you can’t interpret it.”

In fact, he totally demolishes all the ivermectin claims. And he generously provides all the slides and graphs he used here for download:

https://onepagericu.com/s/Debunking_Ivermania.pptx

Now that said, if I were in charge of Uttar Pradesh health, I would have kept up the ivermectin distributiion. Why? Because intestinal roundworms are very common there, especially in children, and round worm infestations worsen Covid outcomes. So it is useful for Covid — but only if you have worms.

It’s a great video. I urge everyone to watch it from the beginning. I know it won’t change your mind, Greywhiskers — nothing will — but others may learn some good stuff.

[moovova]

I’ve had time to rethink that.

Being a Wal-Mart greeter and still alive is not a bad thing.

[gas_dr]

Correct
Few of us physicians supported the shut down … it was ridiculous. The nursing home issues were also political calls. And completely incorrect.

The head of the CDC has not stood at bedside in an eon. Generally those are research MDs and have little clinical experience.

And again, epidemiologists are not physicians.

The majority of what you point out is political and political calculus. There was a lot of other issues that were equally as political on the other side.

Most of us clinicians were stuck in the middle of waring factions.

[grey_whiskers]

The head of the CDC has not stood at bedside in an eon. Generally those are research MDs and have little clinical experience.

I'll get you some WD-40 for the wheels on your goalposts.

[gas_dr]

Epidemiology is an MPh. Degree. Some MDs are MDS have a dual degree. But I have said nothing incorrect. Fauci whom you point to is not licensed to practice medicine in any state. As such he is not a physician.

Your over the top attacks to end conversation such as moving the goal post commentary shows a lack of depth of knowledge. You are better than that. Too many from the Q continuum simply make statements like you have and fail to understand that there is more than a sound bite to understanding what actually is occurring.

Your hubris and attacks only demonstrate your failure to objectively argue rather than be definitive, no matter what you fanboy cheerleader with his cure memes says.

[semimojo]

You’re lying as usual, troll-boi.

And you'll provide as much evidence for that claim as for the rest of yours - none.

[grey_whiskers]

You got caught lying by saying "they're government, they're not physicians" -- which isn't true.

You should have been more careful in your original statements, and said, "...have not practiced clinical medicine or seen patients in XYZ years."

Hence the moving the goalposts. It's not a lack of knowledge on my part. It's your disingenuous use of language.

If someone has an MD degree, then they are a physician.

The distinction between research, epidemiology (some MDs dabble in that), clinical practice, administration, politics, government work, or other categories, does not remove the title "physician" from someone who has an MD.

It is the reputation of MDs in the public mind (aided greatly by the earnings of MDs, and the lionization of MDs on TV shows) which gave Fauci and Brix their power to sway public discourse.

And you reveal your troll status again as saying " Too many from the Q continuum simply make statements like you have " as though this is primarily a Q-related issue.

Q did mention the dissemination of the virus in June 2020 as a role in election fraud attacking Trump (echoing a now-deleted tweet from President Trump himself); but the conversation is now about the knowing malfeasance of those who formulated public policy about the coof and the malfeasance of those who created and pushed the clot-shots, and violated standard protocols for testing even ordinary vaccines, in order to push an experimental gene therapy for something where the overall death rate was << 1%.

I don't have hubris. I have no patience for liars.

And I don't have cheerleaders or fanboys. I post for myself.

[humblegunner]

Thousands of people were forced to take the jab

Who forced them? Were there guns or big beefy dudes beating
on them, knocking them out and shooting them up? Or maybe is
this whole mess an exaggeration? Vaxx bad? Surely. Were people FORCED?

Surely not, but isn't it fun to pretend?

people were forced to take the jab

Oh, by the way... saying "take the jab" is TOTALLY gay.

[humblegunner]

So you hate the gays, eh?

I'm not too keen on them, it's true. Why?

They get a buttfull of Munkeypocks and cry about
the tragic injustice of it all. Well boo frickin' hoo.

They sitting around the gazebo drinking Penis Coladas
reading blogs and fantasizing about Milo.

[humblegunner]

Coof! Jab! Coofy Jabbers! Coof! Jabbity Jab!

You need some new funny words.

[grey_whiskers]

No I don’t.

Those terms are used deliberately to counter the propaganda foisted on everyone, first when COVID-1984 was a thing (including lockdowns, quarantines, and restrictions on travel and attempted coercion by companies to force getting the jab as a condition of employment), and the dishonesty of Pfauci, Pfizer, and Moderna, (and those working at their behest) in calling the experimental gene therapy using mRNA a “vaccine” — which was Orwellian, in addition to cynically attempting to manipulate the reputation of the near-mystical status of vaccines in the public mind. Despite the low death rate from the virus.

Your attempted ridicule linked with strawman fails.

[humblegunner]

So many words, so little meaning.

Making up cute little terms for something is SO 5th grade.

[humblegunner]

Honestly I don’t care it people get shot up or not.
Why should I?
Why should you?

[CatHerd]

Covid is over. It’s now akin to a cold. Why can’t you guys get over it? I agree the lockdowns, etc. caused more harm than good. We disagree on vaccines in that I don’t believe they are bioweapons as some of claim, and I know the difference between gene therapy and an mRNA vaccine*, but the question of whether to get one is now moot. They’re useless at this point.

Why still all the carrying on over the vaccines and Covid?

*If you think the mRNA vaccines are gene therapy, then you think every time you get a virus you’re getting gene therapy. The little boogers have mRNA as part of their package. So do you, it’s in every cell of your body, as it is in all living things.

Here ya go, “Why mRNA vaccines aren’t gene therapies”

https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk

Of course you won’t believe it. You will only believe what you want to believe, truth and Real Science be darned. Better to listen to Steve Kirsch and Bryan Ardis and Stew Peters and the rest of the pack of Covid grifters.

[grey_whiskers]

Of course you won’t believe it. You will only believe what you want to believe, truth and Real Science be darned. Better to listen to Steve Kirsch and Bryan Ardis and Stew Peters and the rest of the pack of Covid grifters.

I think it was page 70 of Moderna's filing with the SEC where they said the company was bleeding money because they couldn't get approved for clinical trials, because the FDA called their product an experimental gene therapy.

And there's a link out there of the CEO or CFO of Moderna after the coof panic, bragging about record earnings, because of Emergency Use Authorization.

I pointed this out at the time. It has nothing to do with Kirsch or Ardis (whom I've never even heard of) or Stew Peters.

The reason your statement is wrong, is that viruses are natural: they are not strands of RNA with one of the nucleotides substituted to tap down the body's recognition of it / prevent degradation, wrapped up in an artificially created microdroplet of lipid material, to enable transport inside the cell; and which a company has produced and promoted with the aim of making a profit; nor are they an artifically manipulated adenovirus designed to enter human cells and modify them to produce a human-designed modification of the natural spike protein.

And given the massive deleterious effects of the jabs, therapy is completely a misnomer.

Cretin.

[grey_whiskers]

Stated upthread. There are so many novel, harmful effects being seen, many of which were predicted before widespread dissemination of the jabs, that at the mildest, all injections should be halted. Hint: why in Hell did Pfizer try to get the results of their clinical trials sealed for 75 years? That alone is so far out of the ordinary it should have raised red flags even a paid troll couldn't ignore.

[grey_whiskers]

Making up cute little terms for something is SO 5th grade.

Fighting fire with fire. The average reading level of most mass media in the US is around that level.