All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

substack.com ^ | June 10, 2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

[ransomnote]

A few days ago I posted an article suggesting the mRNA vaccines were causing a spike in disability. Since that time the story has gone viral, I’ve had more time to look at the data, others have as well, and I now feel the case is very strong. Because this message is critically important, I am writing a second follow up article on the topic. In this article I will attempt to present a comprehensive analysis, and put the data into context with my experience of having worked with individuals with COVID vaccine injuries and individuals with varying degrees of disability including those seeking disability.

The initial discover of this dataset was Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout). He shared this dataset (which can be verified here):

Let’s quickly annotate that to put it into context:

 

MORE AT LINK: All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

 

[bagster]

Shirley Temples. They drink Shirley Temples, of course.

Ahahahahaha. Okay, that makes sense.

Oh, she compared herself to Lincoln in her concession.

She's not as pretty as Lincoln and her beard is more scraggly.

[grey_whiskers]

Oh, but she's the head of the CDC. So by your definition, she's not a real doctor. Shucks.

(brightens)

So that means we shouldn't have listened to ANY of the government hoopola, right?

Like closing down the country for nothing, while seeding COVID patients into nursing homes full of vulnerable elderly to goose the numbers...

[semimojo]

So that means we shouldn't have listened to ANY of the government hoopola, right?

Let's see.

The virus mutated to escape some of the immunity provided by the vaccines but the vaccines are still very effective in preventing hospitalizations and death.

Because of this nothing our public health officials have said is valid.

That's a very solid, well thought out point (for an anti-vaxer).

[grey_whiskers]

The *other* prong of the government lie — which I mentioned explicitly in earlier posts on this thread — is that the jabs are actively detrimental to health in their own right.

And you think you’ve scored a point by putting a non-sequitur strawman in my mouth.

You’re not tall enough for the ride.

[grey_whiskers]

[semimojo]

...the government lie — which I mentioned explicitly in earlier posts on this thread — is that the jabs are actively detrimental to health in their own right.

You might have mentioned it but you sure didn't demonstrate it.

As in providing any evidence beyond your opinion.

I don't think you're right.

[grey_whiskers]

What proportion of MDs got multiple jabs?

And what proportion of airline pilots?

There will be society-wide aftereffects.

"Heavy heart" == swollen == clot-shot side effects?

[bagster]

I don't think you're right.

Wait, you're serious?

Every other thread on FreeRepublic for the past year demonstrates it, vaxxo. Where you been?

[reformedliberal]

...I am not the only one ...

_________________________
I’ve read that 74 million only took one shot & 150+ million remain unvaxxed. Oh, and something like only 5% of children are inoculated.

You are far from alone.

[grey_whiskers]

As in providing any evidence beyond your opinion.

I don't think you're right. <-- only *your* opinion.

The Pfauci Pfanbois and trolls insist on dispositive proof -- on their own terms, by their own definiions; and even then, affect the mantle of "superior, smug, unconcerned, *neutral*, therfore presumptively correct".

But it's an act.

The rate of myocarditis is through the roof.

The rate of myocarditis as a sequel to the clot-shot (seen in VAERS) is hundreds of times that of myocarditis in association with all real vaccines which preceded it, combined, over all time.

The rate of deaths of young (and cardiovascular fit) athletes dropping dead is through the roof compared to baseline.

British hospitals have started campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the signs of *pediatric* STROKE.

Official government statistics from the UK show the majority of those dying from COVID are among the multiply-jabbed, dwarfing the numbers of the never-jabbed.

Multiple countries have shown recent large drops in fertility (up to 23% in Taiwan, for example), 9 months after the mass clot-shot campaigns.

Several insurance companies have noted death rates up 40% over pre-coof levels in Q3/Q4 of 2021; and a Yale (yes, as in Harvard, Yale, Princeton, therefore, by the standards of you trolls, utterly and forever correct and beyond even the possibility of question) epidemiologist is saying the insurance companies will sue clot-shot makers to help recoup losses.

That's all I can think of, around midnight, after being awake 17 hours, off the top of my head.

Get rekt, troll.

[MileHi]

I don't think...

Yeah. Sad that. If you harmed yourself that's a shame. If you allowed your family to be harmed that's really a crime and failure on your part.

[bagster]

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....grey whiskers!

[citizen]

Look again, it’s quite clear. Clean your glasses, perhaps.
There’s an uptick following the lockdown, likely due to some income hunting.
The larger and consistent upward trend follows after the mass vaccinations, and particularly after the fed gov mandates.

---

But I expect you will see what you want to see. Libs are funny that way.

[semimojo]

The Pfauci Pfanbois and trolls insist on dispositive proof -- on their own terms, by their own definiions; and even then, affect the mantle of "superior, smug, unconcerned, *neutral*, therfore presumptively correct".

You don’t read so good. I mentioned evidence, any evidence, not proof.

And by that I mean a link to something we can all examine and discuss.

The rate of deaths of young (and cardiovascular fit) athletes dropping dead is through the roof compared to baseline.

This is a good case in point. I don’t think you can back that up.

I’m aware of the deceptive claim made in The Expose and a few other places but if you take the time to wade through the articles you find that claim is based on a laughable Wikipedia page on soccer deaths solely updated by internet randos.

So instead of evidence of increased deaths we have evidence that some unknown people are posting more news accounts of deaths than they were in prior years.

Contrary to your claim there isn’t a stated baseline nor any rigorous tracking.

Your response shows you know what’s needed - evidence that the rate of adverse events/deaths is higher in the vaccinated population than in a similar unvaccinated one.

This is the most basic test to see if there’s a problem but aside from an increase in mild myocarditis (no deaths recorded) that evidence doesn’t seem to exist.

[CatHerd]

You are right for once, although I doubt semimojo was defending me so much as making an observation about your perfidy. My apologies to you both. I was tired and distracted and posted to the wrong person on that one.

[CatHerd]

Oops. Meant to ping you to my #115 (blush)

[CatHerd]

No, it’s obviously because you did not really find those links, or the links were dubious. You’re the one trolling, making claims, failing to back them up, and calling names.

[grey_whiskers]

https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/the-miracle-not-heard-around-the?r=nxypy&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The key graphic in this one is

And Peru: https://www.actuarial.news/2021/03/28/sharp-reductions-in-covid-19-case-fatalities-and-excess-deaths-in-peru-in-close-time-conjunction-state-by-state-with-ivermectin-treatments/ quoting from

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765018

Money quote:

For the 24 states with early IVM treatment (and Lima), excess deaths dropped 59% (25%) at +30 days and 75% (25%) at +45 days after day of peak deaths. Case fatalities likewise dropped sharply in all states but Lima, yet six indices of Google-tracked community mobility rose over the same period. For nine states having mass distributions of IVM in a short timeframe through a national program, Mega-Operación Tayta (MOT), excess deaths at +30 days dropped by a population-weighted mean of 74%, each drop beginning within 11 day after MOT start. Extraneous causes of mortality reductions were ruled out.

Get stuffed troll.

[grey_whiskers]

You’re lying as usual, troll-boi.
Get stuffed.

[TexasGator]

“Look again, it’s quite clear. Clean your glasses, perhaps.
There’s an uptick following the lockdown, likely due to some income hunting.
The larger and consistent upward trend follows after the mass vaccinations, “

Thanks for agreeing that the uptrend start BEFORE the vaccinations.