Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....grey whiskers!
I don't think you're right. <-- only *your* opinion.
The Pfauci Pfanbois and trolls insist on dispositive proof -- on their own terms, by their own definiions; and even then, affect the mantle of "superior, smug, unconcerned, *neutral*, therfore presumptively correct".
But it's an act.
The rate of myocarditis is through the roof.
The rate of myocarditis as a sequel to the clot-shot (seen in VAERS) is hundreds of times that of myocarditis in association with all real vaccines which preceded it, combined, over all time.
The rate of deaths of young (and cardiovascular fit) athletes dropping dead is through the roof compared to baseline.
British hospitals have started campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the signs of *pediatric* STROKE.
Official government statistics from the UK show the majority of those dying from COVID are among the multiply-jabbed, dwarfing the numbers of the never-jabbed.
Multiple countries have shown recent large drops in fertility (up to 23% in Taiwan, for example), 9 months after the mass clot-shot campaigns.
Several insurance companies have noted death rates up 40% over pre-coof levels in Q3/Q4 of 2021; and a Yale (yes, as in Harvard, Yale, Princeton, therefore, by the standards of you trolls, utterly and forever correct and beyond even the possibility of question) epidemiologist is saying the insurance companies will sue clot-shot makers to help recoup losses.
That's all I can think of, around midnight, after being awake 17 hours, off the top of my head.
Get rekt, troll.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you.....grey whiskers!
You don’t read so good. I mentioned evidence, any evidence, not proof.
And by that I mean a link to something we can all examine and discuss.
The rate of deaths of young (and cardiovascular fit) athletes dropping dead is through the roof compared to baseline.
This is a good case in point. I don’t think you can back that up.
I’m aware of the deceptive claim made in The Expose and a few other places but if you take the time to wade through the articles you find that claim is based on a laughable Wikipedia page on soccer deaths solely updated by internet randos.
So instead of evidence of increased deaths we have evidence that some unknown people are posting more news accounts of deaths than they were in prior years.
Contrary to your claim there isn’t a stated baseline nor any rigorous tracking.
Your response shows you know what’s needed - evidence that the rate of adverse events/deaths is higher in the vaccinated population than in a similar unvaccinated one.
This is the most basic test to see if there’s a problem but aside from an increase in mild myocarditis (no deaths recorded) that evidence doesn’t seem to exist.