Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We could fill Lake Powell in less than a year with an aqueduct from Mississippi River
Desert Sun ^ | 6.30.2022 | Don Siefkes

Posted on 07/01/2022 6:22:47 AM PDT by libh8er

Citizens of Louisiana and Mississippi south of the Old River Control Structure don’t need all that water. All it does is cause flooding and massive tax expenditures to repair and strengthen dikes.

The best solution would be for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build an aqueduct from the Old River Control Structure on the Mississippi to Lake Powell, fill it, and then send more water from there down the Colorado to fill lake Mead.

About 4.5 million/gals a second flow past that structure on the Mississippi. As mentioned, New Orleans has a problem with that much water anyway, so let’s divert 250,000 gallons/sec to Lake Powell, which currently has a shortage of 5.5 trillion gallons.

This would take 254 days to fill.

Lake Mead has a somewhat larger shortage, about 8 trillion gallons, but it could be filled in about 370 days at 250,000 gallons/sec.

Within a year and eight months of the aqueduct’s finish, both reservoirs would be filled and most of the Southwest’s water problems would be gone. We built a California aqueduct that saved Southern California and a crude oil pipeline across Alaska that were far more difficult than this proposal.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aquaduct; california; californiasucks; consequences; desalination; drought; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; lakemead; lakepowell; louisiana; mississippi; mississippiriver; neworleans; nuclearpower; parasiticgrowth; southwest; trickleirrigation; unintended
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last
To: mountainlion

IMO, California is single-handedly responsible for much of the dearth of water throughout the southeast US.


21 posted on 07/01/2022 6:34:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
Aside from the $20 Billion minimum price tag....

Enviro-whackos have a fraudulent claim of an "endangered species" for every square acre in the U.S.

This began in the 80s to obstruct development.

22 posted on 07/01/2022 6:35:13 AM PDT by G Larry (Anybody notice that Satan is hard at work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Once you start lowering the Mississippi, then you start restricting commerce and shipping through the entire Midwest. That would affect a lot more than "just" Louisiana and Mississippi.

Exactly correct, and in the last 10-15 years we have experienced issues w/the Mississippi river being too low for barges and other freight traffic to move. So this idea gets a big NO from me.

23 posted on 07/01/2022 6:35:50 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

All you have to do is take the electricity that would have gone to charging EVs and use it to pump water. Of course, that’s electricity that won’t be available anyway, so it might as well go to not pumping water as well as not charging EVs.


24 posted on 07/01/2022 6:35:58 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Wanting to make America great isn’t an insult unless you’re trying to make it worse! ULTRAMAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yup. They’re idiots. Water flows down hill and needs to be pumped up hill, unless you have the right condition for a giant siphon. It reminds me of the California high speed rail boondoggle that engineers suddenly realized that there were high mountains in the way five years after the project was approved.


25 posted on 07/01/2022 6:36:48 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

The elevation of Lake Powell is 3,652 feet..... The Mississippi cannot be too much above sea level. 100-200-300 ft? Depending on what part of the Mississippi River.

So pumping Mississippi water to Lake Powell would burn up lots of fossil fuels.


26 posted on 07/01/2022 6:37:23 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

California worked fine with 10-15 million people, 20 million tops. All the infrastructure was built in the 40s to 60s for 20 million people. Now the state has 40 million.

It’s somewhat of a self-correcting problem because, the fine weather and scenery notwithstanding, it’s become a real sh!thole and people are leaving. They aren’t leaving fast enough, though. You just have to get 20 million to leave.

The recent droughts are so bad that I’m not sure California would work even with 20 million people.


27 posted on 07/01/2022 6:38:49 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Wanting to make America great isn’t an insult unless you’re trying to make it worse! ULTRAMAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Tapping the Mississippi at the point mentioned shouldn’t lower it upstream.

True, but barges and ships don't stay upstream. Removing the capability to travel to the Gulf would essentially shut it down.

28 posted on 07/01/2022 6:38:55 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

That’s just under twice the length of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (800 miles). That was built in 1975-1977.


29 posted on 07/01/2022 6:40:39 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Wanting to make America great isn’t an insult unless you’re trying to make it worse! ULTRAMAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Maybe if California didn’t commit environmental terrorism by allowing unrestricted illegal immigration and taking on MILLIONS of citizens to gain political power, far beyond what their states resources could handle and draining other states reserves beyond the ability to recharge they wouldn’t have to steal water from eastern states.


30 posted on 07/01/2022 6:41:01 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I can’t decide whether to sing in my mind “Rocky Mountain High” or “Black Water.”


31 posted on 07/01/2022 6:41:26 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

I wrote a business plan for such a private project (since the government is so obviously not doing its job).

It penciled out nicely.

Then I pinched myself as to who it would benefit the most and I immediately woke up.

Seriously, though, I reviewed such a possibility years ago; seemed feasible.


32 posted on 07/01/2022 6:41:38 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
There is a little problem with this approach. It is known as the Rocky Mountains. The author has no clue about the engineering involved

And you have no clue about where the Rocky Mountains are. I agree its a ridiculous engineering challenge, but if you draw a line from New Orleans to Lake Mead it won't cross the Rockies.

33 posted on 07/01/2022 6:41:39 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Kinda seems to me that this clown needs to look at a map. It’s over 1400 miles from the Old Control Structure to Lake Powell. What kind of pumps can handle 250,000/gallons per second and maintain that flow for 1400 miles? How big would the diameter of the pipe have to be to handle that kind of load?


34 posted on 07/01/2022 6:42:36 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy. I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
We built a California aqueduct that saved Southern California

Begs the question:

WHY???


35 posted on 07/01/2022 6:43:13 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

A canal from the Columbia River or Cascades in the rainy NorthWest to Las Vegas should be a consideration.

We did the Central Arizona Project with canals. Peeps are moving southwest


36 posted on 07/01/2022 6:43:24 AM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

“perhaps a trans continental pipeline to take water from flood zones to areas of severe drought.”

I said the same thing many years ago when I saw all the flooding from rives overflowing. Some of that water can flow to Texas and other Southwestern states for farming. Produce more of our own food for domestic use and export. Whole new economies will open up and flourish and millions of jobs will open with it.

You can also do this in other countries which are arid by nature. Few desalination facilities along the African coastline, piping clean water inland for consumption and farming. Plant millions of trees to sequester carbon.


37 posted on 07/01/2022 6:44:07 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (DJT24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

The libs would never allow it even if it were feasible.


38 posted on 07/01/2022 6:44:26 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

> that’s electricity that won’t be available anyway, so it might as well go to not pumping water as well as not charging EVs <

Now that’s funny right there!


39 posted on 07/01/2022 6:44:38 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Eco-morons would put the kibosh on it. Might harm some little bug.


40 posted on 07/01/2022 6:44:53 AM PDT by beethovenfan (The REAL Great Reset will be when Jesus returns. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson