Posted on 06/16/2022 9:34:37 AM PDT by Pollard
For two decades scientists have been quietly developing self-spreading contagious vaccines. The NIH funded this research, in which either DNA from a deadly pathogen is packaged in a contagious but less harmful virus, or the deadly virus’s lethality is weakened by engineering it in a lab.
The resultant “vaccines” spread from one person to the next just like a contagious respiratory virus. Only five percent of regional populations would need to be immunized; the other ninety-five percent would “catch” the vaccine as it spread person-to-person through community transmission.
This technology bypasses the inconvenience of recalcitrant citizens who may refuse to give consent. Its advocates highlight that a mass vaccination campaign that would ordinarily take months of expensive effort to immunize everyone could be shortened to only a few weeks.
Scientists have already shown proof of concept in animal populations: in 2000, Spanish researchers injected seventy rabbits with a transmissible vaccine and returned them to the wild, where they quickly passed the vaccine on to hundreds more, reportedly stopping a viral outbreak. European countries are now testing the technology on pigs.
(Excerpt) Read more at brownstone.org ...
For me, the key point is that governments are doing research on viruses in a variety of ways which really ought to raise ethical concerns. If one can spotlight some research (as in this article) which might potentially seem “harmless” to some people, then “hey, it’s just research”. But if one were to identify some research (that led to COVID-19) which would alarm many people, then “hey, we would never do that. We were not involved. It was bat soup at the Wuhan wet market. This certainly never came out of a lab.”.
These people are not to be trusted, and this sort of research seems pretty hard to justify, in my opinion.
So vaccine shedding really is a thing. Seems this has been something the anti-vaxxers have been concerned with for a while, and the pro-vaxxers denied could happen.
I agree.
My only point was that “gain of function” is only one genetic modifying tool/method/procedure in their basket of “tools/methods/procdures they can use. The ultimate “bad” thing is not necessarily “gain of function” istelf, but what “function(s)” was(were) gained, if any, and what may be bad about the thing having the new functions.
And yes I think the people playing with this technogy are only half or less as smart as they think they are and are likely to create a super unstoppable bug, out of arrogance combined with stupdity combined with negligence.
Give a monkeyPOX to one gay and let it loose at a BDSM convention and VIOLA:-)
The left thinks that “Stargate - 2010” was an instruction video. Check it out, it’s almost as if the writers had already been sentenced to see our inept CDC through time travel.
“This technology bypasses the inconvenience of recalcitrant citizens who may refuse to give consent.”
They’re just blatant about being little nazis now.
Well, farmers have the luxury of culling the herd when the vaccines fail.
I imagine that is a luxury the NIH covets very much nowadays.
Technically, the penalty for performing medical experiments on unwilling human subjects without informed consent is already death.
We just haven’t prosecuted people for it lately.
“No population control agenda.”
~~~
I don’t know about all that. I’m not dismissing it. I tend to think that if there is a conspiracy, it’s to make money on the back end, but you may be right. We all know how much leftists hate people and humanity (a word they use a lot in irony), so it wouldn’t suprise me that they want to cull the numbers down to something more ‘manageable’. heh. So I probably should have put a big “/sarc” after my “golly!” I thought the sarcasm would be dripping, but there is no way in hell these guys invest this level of research all for the unrewarded good of human beings. heh
Anyone who releases such a ‘vaccine’ into the wild is a MURDERER, and should be executed by hanging with extreme prejudice.
It’s essentially the plot of the movie “Serenity”; the totalitarian “Alliance” government released gene-modification agents into the air processor on the planet Miranda to change people’s behavior to be more calm, and it backfired, creating aggressive murderous zombies that the Firefly canon calls “Reavers”.
The movie "12 Monkeys" gives a pretty good idea. Great movie, watch it if you haven't already.
Gee... what could possibly go wrong here....
European countries are now testing the technology on pigs.
= = =
Oh?
I do not speak ‘pig’.
Oink, Oink does not mean what you think it does.
The level, or rather depths, of evil that exists in those living among us, is demonic in character.
Sam Adams was recalcitrant.
Al Hamilton, James Madison, much younger than Sam, were no slouches on that score either.
Since when has this aspect of the American personality become so obviously negative that science and government feel so free to devise ways to bypass it?
kind of wondering what execution by hanging without prejudice, or with ordinary prejudice, would look like, compared to the extreme variety... ;-)
It sounds like something that would be done to rabbits, chickens and sheep. Farm animals that you shear or harvest for your own profit.
______________________
Also used for wild animal herds, but you understand fully.
“Those who know what’s best for us
must rise and save us from ourselves.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.