Posted on 03/31/2022 8:23:17 AM PDT by Red Badger
You've heard about the dangers of secondhand cigarette smoke, but what about secondhand bong smoke?
The haze after a bubbly bong hit may appear harmless, but a new study published Wednesday in JAMA Network Open found bystanders may be inhaling air pollutants at concentrations more than twice federal air quality limits.
Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, measured fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in a real-world setting where a group of young adults socially smoked cannabis with a bong for two hours in an ordinary household living room. An aerosol monitor was placed where a nonsmoker might sit, recording PM2.5 levels before, during and after eight sessions.
They found home cannabis bong smoking significantly increased PM2.5 from background levels by at least 100-fold. Within the first 15 minutes of smoking, PM2.5 concentrations surpassed air quality levels deemed safe by the Environmental Protection Agency.
"There's negative attitudes to secondhand tobacco smoke but not really to secondhand cannabis smoke," said lead study author Patton Nguyen, an industrial hygienist and a graduate of UC Berkeley School of Public Health. "What we want this study to do is really elucidate and help people understand that there are public health concerns."
Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5, are tiny particles in the air that can travel deep into the respiratory tract, reaching the lungs and impacting their function. Some studies suggest long term exposure to PM2.5 may be linked to lung and heart diseases.
Study authors said PM2.5 concentrations from cannabis bong smoking were at least four times greater than concentrations from secondhand tobacco smoke from cigarettes or hookah found in previous studies.
Although health experts say the findings are noteworthy, more research is needed before conclusions can be made about smoking marijuana with a bong versus smoking tobacco as researchers did not control how much pot was smoked in the study.
"There's very little research in this area," said Dr. Silvia Martins, professor of epidemiology and director of the Substance Use Epidemiology Unit at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. "This (study) is one of the first in a controlled environment."
Researchers note PM2.5 concentrations also took a long time to return to pre-smoking levels. In one session, levels remained at more than 10 times the original concentration 12 hours after the group stopped smoking.
This suggests people entering a home hours after a bong session could still be affected by secondhand smoke.
"It can actually affect the health of children who are nearby or other people in pretty serious ways," said corresponding author Katharine Hammond, a professor at UC Berkeley School of Public Health. "We need to wake up to that."
Although recreational cannabis use is perceived by some as a harmless past time, Hammond and Nguyen say no level of toxins and air pollutants in cannabis smoke is considered safe.
"There are potential exposures to high concentrations of toxins and these toxins are associated with negative or adverse health effects," Nguyen said. "We really need to be mindful that nonsmokers present can be exposed."
Windows and doors were closed throughout the study but he says future research will look at how ventilation plays a role in PM2.5 exposure from cannabis smoke.
He also plans to publish additional data from the same study that measured other harmful chemicals and carcinogens from secondhand bong smoke.
"Our job as scientists really is to release this unbiased information to help inform the public," Nguyen said. "The big take-home message is secondhand cannabis smoke is not safe and people's public perceptions should be addressed."
Explore further
Long-term cannabis use damages lungs, but in a different way than tobacco
More information:
Patton Khuu Nguyen et al, Fine Particulate Matter Exposure From Secondhand Cannabis Bong Smoking, JAMA Network Open (2022).
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4744
Journal information: JAMA Network Open
I wanna know how much these “researchers” were paid. Or maybe they were volunteers.
Heard about it, never believed it.
The smoke coming out a car's tailpipe and from dozens of every day practices in a home are 1,000 times worse.
It’s Berkeley.....................
“...more research is needed
as researchers did not control
how much pot was smoked in the study...”
-
Like, wow, man.
Yeah, but I don’t put my mouth on a car’s tailpipe and inhale..........................................any more...................
Imagine getting a grant to smoke dope...................
Talk about wasting time looking for new problems to solve. Who gives a sh!t about this?
What matters is that the Karens believe that one breath of second-hand smoke will kill on contact.
That is why I call my cigars Karen-repellents.
;-)
Far out man...
“Quit harshin’ my buzz, Man!” ;)
Wait.............What?
Maybe this should be a Gardening Ping?...................
ignore the study, mj is politically correct and there is no big money to sue.................
Too much time spent in the bong shelter.
Just reading the vague description of this experiment, it is very obvious that they worked the heck of its parameters to give the worst possible outcome.
Sure, a lot of “researchers” fudge their experiments to give a desired outcome, but most of them at least try to have the appearance of a modicum of legitimacy. But these days they can’t be bothered.
Is there a difference between a pipe, a joint, or a bong?
Was there a window open?
Was there alcohol involved?
How many oz were smoked?
Was it good weed, or bad weed?
Indica, or sativa, or alien hybrid
Was this study peer reviewed?
All good questions.
More study needed.
Don’t bogart the doobie..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.