questioning the source...."
Posted on 12/28/2021 1:26:42 PM PST by ransomnote
After the Conejo Guardian’s report on alarming trends in Ventura County hospitals, more nurses have come forward to affirm the rise in unexplained heart problems, strokes and blood clotting in local vaccinated patient populations. They also say doctors refuse to consider that these could be adverse reactions to Covid shots.
Sam, a critical care nurse at an ICU in a Ventura County hospital, came forward because, “I’m tired of all the B.S. that’s going on,” he told the Guardian. “It’s crazy how nobody questions anything anymore.”
“NONE [OF THE DOCTORS] QUESTION WHETHER THE VACCINE CAUSES MYOCARDITIS, PERICARDITIS AND THE STROKES THAT ARE COMING IN. IF THEY DON’T TOE THE LINE, THEY COULD LOSE THEIR MEDICAL LICENSE.”
He has witnessed a surge in numbers of young people experiencing severe health problems after receiving Covid shots.
“We’ve been having a lot of younger people come in,” Sam says. “We’re seeing a lot of strokes, a lot of heart attacks.”
One 38-year-old-woman came in with occlusions (blockages of blood flow) in her brain.
“They [doctors] were searching for everything under the sun and documenting this in the chart, but nowhere do you see if she was vaccinated or not,” Sam says. “One thing the vaccine causes is thrombosis, clotting. Here you have a 38-year-old woman who was double-vaccinated and she’s having strokes they can’t explain. None of the doctors relates it to the vaccine. It’s garbage. It’s absolute garbage.”
MORE AT LINK
Yes, words you are not allowed to say. Doctors have a lot in common with magicians.
Especially with the credential burnishing ID of "Sam".
At "some" hospital in Ventura County.
Just believe him! Ok?
No? So when did you stop taking ChiCom cash? Hmmm? LOL
Well if there is no middle ground then you have made a decision — however I note that you are not willing to approach a middle ground while attacking my perceived position. You have lofted accusations that I do not find accurate
The middle ground for me is that which I have advocated. Vaccination is not a mandate nor should be. I could require my employees to be vaccinated — I choose not to, because I think it is morally incorrect to force that. However, working in health care the largest majority of us choose to be vaccinated — only those who want to squawk and have a moment in the limelight tweet their outrage.
It would seem to be that the exact accusations fall true on “your side”.
So you have perfectly illustrated the point — you are either 100% in agreement with you or there is no point for discussion — the very definition of zealotry.
Thank you for your candid response to an honest question.
Wait! I figured it out!
Wasn’t Sam the name of the butcher in The Brady Bunch?
Maybe he’s an RN now?
CCRN?
It’s possible?
My point is that “Sam” could have provided -very- specific information to make his claims more credible.
He didn’t. Wonder why.
Oh please — obviously you have no idea what the definition of malpractice is (except you don’t agree with anything) and yes, patient die of covid
Get a grip — and spare me the argument that patients die with covid. In patients who have covid many die because of the interaction of the disease with their physiology and health status. If they did not have covid they would not have died.
I understand you have to think you say something intelligent but you are simply a drone who has no idea what he is talking about.
Yes, I know. You re so correct. How could I not capitulate to the obvious intellectual firepower of SAM
re: “A nurse can’t decide to medicate a patient on their own.”
Why is you ppl regress to a back-peddled position WHEN such a point is NOT in contention or being discussed?
Is this like a ‘virtue signalling’ statement you feel compelled to make? For the benefit of whom? At this rate you are ‘just clogging up the airwaves’ with useless statements, ESPECIALLY when it comes to matters of legality (which can be quite easily circumvented ‘under the table’ or behind closed doors).
re: “There are Standing Orders and Protocols however that are preset by the Medical Control Doctor.”
Are you a nitwit or a “midwit”? The two present very similarly in public sometimes.
This WHOLE Covid-19 debacles is on account of the statement you just penned; NO ONE is free think on their own, LET ALONE voice a dissenting opinion from Fauci on down. Dr. Vlad Zelenko can tell you about this, as can Dr. Peter McCullough.
I think Briggs in this essay pegs those like you quite nicely - so why should I write out what he so elegantly in prose puts forth here:
“How The Expertocracy Builds Consensus & You Become A Denier”
https://wmbriggs.com/post/38473/
To paraphrase Buzz Lightyear: “To infini-Fauci and beyond!”
So, you came here using this legal definition, knowing full well that it would incite people to argue with you. You came here to cause trouble. You are a troll.
Why say anything at all???
This.
“The Expertocracy” - experts with expertise
I have learned, that it, and they, are problematic. That is very unfortunate for us, in life: Hard to find a good ______. When we like to think, that “the professionals” can be trusted.
I have found, that a study of a person’s self-estimation (ego scale), combined with a study of that person’s willingness to listen and study in, and outside, their knowledge base, helps me to get to know that person and leads to trust. Because, I get to see how they (that person) think(s).
At the college I attended, there was a Student Health Center, where most of the doctors were residents at the college’s hospital. After wondering if a couple doctors whom I had seen, knew what they were doing, I started digging around the fringes of the clinic, getting the opinions of some of the regular employees.
One employee suggested that I try Dr. W. OK; I set up an appointment. And on the occasion of my first visit, I wandered thru a bit of the back alleys of the health center, finding his office . . . way in the back.
There he was, at his desk, studying. Every time I visited, he was always there, studying. He resembled a USSS agent I had known, briefly, who also was careful and studious (old guard). Over the last years of my college career (ahem, cough), the good doctor and I had several conversations about medicine and things. He was thoughtful and considerate.
Eventually, I really did have a medical problem, and the good doctor referred me to a fellow doctor who really knew his business (and was also the chief of surgery at a local hospital). This surgeon could be cryptic and tough, but he knew that I was in a tight spot, and he came to my rescue (along with his nurse, who really, really knew her business).
All three of them, the two good doctors plus the nurse, were good people who I could trust. If they ever had an unkind word to say, I never heard it. None of them wished (as far as I could tell), nor seemed inclined, to do harm - in deed and in word. Instead, they conveyed what they knew that was helpful, and they conveyed along with that knowledge, their carefully applied skills.
Yet, I had to dig, to find them -— instead of trusting any schemes of “experts with expertise” that functions as a moat around bodies that are not as good as such bodies profess.
I expect professionals to be self-critical, and therefore very curious to learn beyond what is the knot of their mistake, in addtion to how they flubbed something(s) at that knot.
Trotting out their certificates and “I’ve been doing this for 20 years!” do not work for me.
A friend, and GI doctor, readily admitted something that he did not know. Along with admitting where he had been wrong about something, years earlier - when he then thought he knew it all. In my view, his honesty - that, I could trust.
No. I came presenting an argument questioning the source. I am sorry you think that makes me a troll. But I will note that everyone who dares to disagree with you is a troll.
Thanks for revealing yourself.
Trying to educate and gave an example.
Apparently that triggers you.
I didn’t really comment directly about what the Nurse in the story said.
That doesn’t matter to you, because if you sense I’m not buying what an unknown unverified source says, you lose your mind and decorum.
You seem very emotional by my comments explain the the functions and procedures.
In fact, I didn’t even comment on the “Whistleblower’s” statement.
Like always, Fauci is inserted as a classic attempt to discredit.
Problem is, at this stage by doing that and inserting Fauci, or Nazi, or paid Big Pharma Shill only shows how fact less and triggered the poster is.
So carry on………..I won’t provide you with any more education on how the authority structure works. You can’t handle it.
I can’t imagine your dismay had I actually commented on the Whistleblower herself.
I don’t buy that....but whatever
A buddy of mine, age 71 and in good health, took the shots per his doctor’s advice. A week later he was in the hospital with blood clots in his lungs. Was having hell trying to breathe. He is ok now, but he runs out of energy easily.
He is pretty pissed about all this.
Is gas doctor a she? The arrogance of docs is endemic. She docs may be worse. I have one staying with me now and sometimes she is just insufferably haughty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.