Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Well if there is no middle ground then you have made a decision — however I note that you are not willing to approach a middle ground while attacking my perceived position. You have lofted accusations that I do not find accurate

The middle ground for me is that which I have advocated. Vaccination is not a mandate nor should be. I could require my employees to be vaccinated — I choose not to, because I think it is morally incorrect to force that. However, working in health care the largest majority of us choose to be vaccinated — only those who want to squawk and have a moment in the limelight tweet their outrage.

It would seem to be that the exact accusations fall true on “your side”.

So you have perfectly illustrated the point — you are either 100% in agreement with you or there is no point for discussion — the very definition of zealotry.

Thank you for your candid response to an honest question.


243 posted on 12/29/2021 11:15:16 AM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

My point is that “Sam” could have provided -very- specific information to make his claims more credible.

He didn’t. Wonder why.


245 posted on 12/29/2021 11:17:17 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson