And in walked the Dark Lord of the Vax, Gassie-Fauch himself. We do not say his true name, 'Vaxamort'.
And a pall fell over the internet.
But of course you are correct in what you have said.
Gassie and Bluevax
sittin' in a tree
v-a-x-x-i-n-g
Posted on 11/18/2021 2:41:35 AM PST by blueplum
...One of the drug's biggest promoters, Dr. Pierre Kory, a critical care doctor based in Wisconsin, claimed to take the drug weekly last December during a U.S. Senate hearing. Eight months later, he contracted Covid-19, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported on Wednesday. Kory has not publicly stated if he is vaccinated against the disease.
Kory has testified twice to the U.S. Senate in support of ivermectin, stating that it is a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-19....
...As of October 2021, there have been 1,810 reported cases of ivermectin poisoning across the country, compared to 499 within the first 10 months of 2019, reports the Journal Sentinel...
(Excerpt) Read more at menshealth.com ...
re: “It is at best a weak early treatment.”
IT boggles the mind; WHAT do you think already having it ‘in the system’ does?
Again, you’re just a ‘mind boggler’, defying both logic AND reason.
And in walked the Dark Lord of the Vax, Gassie-Fauch himself. We do not say his true name, 'Vaxamort'.
And a pall fell over the internet.
But of course you are correct in what you have said.
Gassie and Bluevax
sittin' in a tree
v-a-x-x-i-n-g
Don’t you usually crawl out of your hole at night? A little early for you baggie.
It boggles the mind that you can’t ask a coherent question. What is it exactly you are trying to ask
Where are you getting this 'worship' thing from, you goofy man. You straight trippin' this morning, gassie.
My hole is open 24 hours a day.
Wait. Strike that.
Ahhh the truth shall set you free :-)
Just because Ivermectin is not 100% effective does not mean it does not work. It is a whole lot more effective than the so-called vaccines.
I concur with that sentiment.
Now say it with me....'The vax is not safe and effective'...'Ivermectin works'....
There. Now don't you feel better?
I was more commenting on your hole being open 24 hours. I kind of admire that.
Would you like another second opinion?
I noticed on your profile page a list of “We are not willing ..., we will not ..., etc.” It seems that your true mindset indicates that you ARE willing to surrender our sovereignty (to China and the USA deep state). And you ARE willing to accept foreign rule (China). And you ARE a shackled voice in a sea of billions (fearful sheep).
Like the Cowardly Lion — all boisterous and huffy, but not truly courageous deep inside.
Many people who trusted the vaccine got COVID-19 and died.
That never makes the news though.
re: “It boggles the mind that you can’t ask a coherent question. “
Wow. You’re a moron too. I ASKED a RHETORICAL question, moron, as part of an OBSERVATION. I don’t expect a coherent answer FROM YOU b/c you can’t POSSIBLY supply one.
Oh I know, clever boy. Nothing gets by the Bagster.
Would you like another second opinion?
Don't tell me. I'm ugly too. I bet you're a real stitch around the water cooler down at the ivermectin science denier's clinic.
If he ends up in a the hospital, on a ventilator then they may have him on Ivermectin’s effectiveness. Just getting Covid doesn’t disprove him, especially if he only has a minor case.
I have ivermectin BUT my doc told me to take it at the first sign of virus SO what the hell is this report about, I will SEE if the doc comes through this without a vent or hospitalization GEEZE which is the same damn thing as their STINKING VAX!!!
“ If researchers can’t turn over data, it’s not legitimate.”
Please square this with the FDA asking for 55 YEARS!!! to release their data on the “vaccines”.
I’ll wait
In the meantime, go shill somewhere else
“ Ivermectin is not a prophylaxis. It is at best a weak early treatment. Monoclonal sorry virtually stop the disease in its tracks. The literature on ivermectin is at best equivocal if one reads it instead of worships it.
Monoclonal are also an excellent post exposure prophylaxis. This plus a targeted therapeutic are exactly what the vaccine doubters want. The question is will you be intellectually consistent?”
Ahh, GasBag is back with freshly relocated goalposts. I remember when all you did was shill the fake vaccines (actually gene therapy). Now, you attack Ivermectin in favor of monoclonal antibodies.
News flash oh dishonest one, those of us who are on to the vax fraud don’t have an issue with monoclonal antibody treatments. We also don’t have an issue with the niatonin protocols. We have issues with rushed and dangerous gene therapies that have not been tested, and were never successful in the past, doing dangerous things and harming people who are forced to take them. You know, like all of the animals they killed during earlier mRNA attempts.
It must suck to be so stupid that you end up supporting us while believing you are proving us wrong.
How many people did you kill this week? Last? Since covid started? Let’s see the numbers. Perhaps you can overtake Kevorkian
Yep. If getting infected after taking Ivermectin is proof it doesn’t work, what about the thousands of breakthrough cases in vaccinated people? I don’t know if anyone claims that ANY alternative treatment or prophylactic is 100% effective, and that’s the same thing that pro-vaxxers say about breakthrough cases.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.