Posted on 10/16/2021 11:02:58 AM PDT by Kevmo
Swartz: Pulsing Sideband at 327.37 MHz May Herald Movements within an Active Loaded PdD Lattice
Mitchell R. Swartz, MD, ScD, EE AC1ER JET Energy, Inc. July 14, 2019 © 2019
Active LANR (lattice assisted nuclear reaction) systems, both aqueous and dry nanomaterial, emit very narrow bandwidth radiofrequency (RF) emission lines (circa 327.37 MHz) in the Deuteron-Line (DL) region [1]. The maser line can include sidebands which appear by resonance broadening and energy exchange processes [2].
The superhyperfine sideband line (SHFL) structure (Figure 1) has been analyzed for the aqueous nickel MOAC system in its active mode [3]. In that light, the pulsatile superhyperfine RF line (PSHFL) is evident with periods of minutes. It is unlike everything else examined over two years from Earth and galactic origin, and only associated with Excess Heat from an ordinary water nickel CF/LANR system.
This is not mode-locking [4]. Laser mode locking involves hundreds of half-wavelengths, enabling interaction of different mode orders; but this 327 MHz LANR maser has only single-mode (half wavelength) operation. Laser mode locked pulses are separated by the Fabry-Perot cavity transit time but the 327 MHz LANR maser pulsing sideband is characterized by times which are minutes.
Finally, laser mode locked pulses have a Gaussian or a hyperbolic-secantsquared (sech2) pulse shape but the 327 CF/LANR maser’s pulses appear as near step functions.
What this is, instead, might be new information obtained from these unique pulsing RF bands which may herald deuteron density movements between, and to other, lattice regions, as revealed by the PSHFL (and interpreted, depending upon the model used: Band States, Bose Einstein condensates, and other quasiparticles).
It is a fact that thirty years of data demonstrate that deuterons loaded into Group VIII metals DO work together in active LANR systems to generate de novo 4He.
There are inverted populations of atomic D [1] with RF D-line emission sidebands [2] and this RF pulsing from active LANR systems might indicate part of an active-necessary deuteron redistribution in the lattice. Is such redistribution a sine qua non for successful movement through the Coulomb barrier?
Efforts are underway to examine this further, including intensities, pulsations and transfer-movements; which together suggest a need for an intralattice kinetoscope.
Figure 1 – Pulsatile RF Emissions in a Background of other RF SHF Lines The Radiofrequency Superhyperfine D-L spectrum of hydrogen loaded nickel MOAC during its active state [40 volts, 200 milliamperes]. This is a ‘waterfall’ plot and intensity is shown as a function of frequency. Note the arrow appears to almost be a horizontal mirror axis.
[1] Swartz M., Atomic Deuterium in Active LANR Systems Produces 327.37 MHz Superhyperfine RF Maser Emission (ICCF-22, 2019)
[2] Swartz M., Superhyperfine Sideband Structure of the Deuteron Line Emission from the ZrO2PdD Active Site May Herald an FCC Vacancy (ICCF-22, 2019)
[3] Swartz, M. R, C. Haldemann, A. Weinberg, B. Ahern, Possible Deuterium Loss During Excess Heat From Ordinary Water-Carbonate Electrolyte using Nickel, J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. (Proc. ICCF21, 2018)
[4] Herman A. Haus, Mode-Locking of Lasers, IEEE J Sel. Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6, 6, (2000) , 1173
[5] The author thanks David Nagel and Bo Gardmark.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swartz: Atomic Deuterium in Active LANR Systems Produces 327.37 MHz Superhyperfine RF Maser Emission
Mitchell R. Swartz AC1ER JET Energy, Inc. June 21, 2019
Active lattice assisted nuclear reaction (LANR) systems, both aqueous and dry nanomaterial, emit very narrow bandwidth radiofrequency (RF) emission peaks (circa 327.37 MHz), in the Deuteron-line (“DL”; 327.348 MHz) region.
Figure 1 shows RF maser emission from a preloaded ZrO2PdD Nanor®-type LANR component [1,2] operated below its avalanche voltage in a well-grounded resonant Fabry Perot chamber. The high Q [> 1.2 x 106 ] and Zeeman response indicate maser activity.
There are superhyperfine sidebands. Nearest neighbor resonance analysis of those superhyperfine emissions heralds reactions occurring in a Pd lattice palladium face center cubic vacancy.
D-loaded active nickel is far more complex. Figure 1 –Software Defined Radio Identification of LANR D-Line Maser Emission
In this dual graph, there are two regions; in both, the frequency increases from left to right. The upper portion shows RF intensity peaks as a function of frequency (horizontal) at a single moment in time. On the bottom, each peak appears as a dot on a line for each one moment in time, and time increases from top to bottom, as in a waterfall.
The DL RF CF/LANR maser emission line is indicated in both portions of the display.
[1] Swartz M. R., Verner G., Tolleson, J, Energy Gain From Preloaded ZrO2–PdNi–D Nanostructured CF/LANR Quantum Electronic Components, JCMNSci. 13, 528 (2014).
[2] Swartz, M. R. G. Verner, J. Tolleson, P. Hagelstein, Dry, preloaded NANOR®-type CF/LANR components, Current Science, 108, 4, 595 (2015)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swartz: Superhyperfine Structure of the Deuteron Line Emission from Active ZrO2PdD Heralds an FCC Vacancy
Mitchell R. Swartz AC1ER Nanortech, Inc. June 29, 2019 ©
Analysis of non-Zeeman superhyperfine line (SHFL) splitting in LANR-induced RF DLemissions [1] yields insight into the LANR active site not otherwise available [Figure 1]. The SHFL emitted at 327.37 MHz from an active ZrO2PdD component [2] have been analyzed for asymmetry, amplitude and position as a function of frequency.
The asymmetry is 7-15% (1st through 3rd closest positions); smaller than the ~50% noted for some Zeeman splittings [3]. Most importantly, the SHFL arise from resonance broadening (RB) which occurs from perturbing deuterons in other vacancies through energy exchange processes.
RB impact was derived for the first four closest neighbor sites. The RB interaction decreases as 1/r^3 .
Figure 1 demonstrates the better overlap of the expected FCC locations in the midgraph, unlike the BCC lattice. The coordination numbers (CN) also better match for the FCC lattice.
Thus, analysis of the CN and RB sideband positions as a function of frequency strongly suggest that the location of the excited state deuterium is a palladium (Pd) vacancy within a slightly modified FCC lattice.
The modification shows a multiplet near the second nearest neighbor which might indicate nearby zirconia at a rhombic corner (isoequivalent to a FCC vacancy) or an atom of zirconium (or impurity) within the PdD lattice.
The results in nickel are more complex and demonstrate a range of FCC and body centered cubic (BCC) vacancies, possibly heralding new metallurgic phases.
This discovery adds semiquantitative material science support to theories that cite vacancies [4] as the site of the desired LANR reactions.
Figure 1 – Lattice Analysis of Active PdD Component’s Frequency-Time Plot This top shows the actual SHFL sideband structure for Nanor®-type component #7-4, driven at ~10 volts. This is a ‘waterfall’ plot and intensity is shown as a function of frequency. The middle and bottom of the fig. show the expected results for two different gendanken active sites, face and body centered cubic (FCC, BCC) respectively: both the coordination numbers (height) and expected deviation (to the right for frequency).
[1] Swartz M., Atomic Deuterium Produces 327.37 MHz Superhyperfine RF Maser Emission (ICCF-22, 2019) [2] Swartz M. R., Verner, G., Hagelstein, P., Imaging of an Active NANOR®-type LANR Component using CR-39, J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 15, (2015), p 81; www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol15.pdf
[3] J. E. Mack and O. Laporte, Asymmetric Zeeman Effect Patterns in a Complex Spectrum, Physical Review Journals Archive, Phys. Rev. 51, 291 (February 1937); DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.291.2
[4] Swartz M., Catastrophic Active Medium (CAM) Theory of Cold Fusion, Proc. ICCF4 4, (1993), p 255
[5] The author thanks David Nagel, Bo Gardmark, Dennis Craven, Peter Hagelstein, Michael Staker, and Louis Dechiaro
Gobbledygook
Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.
Then why not post something newsworthy?
***This is posted in CHAT. We regularly report LENR news. We don’t have to live up to your attempts to manipulate us, so kindly leave the thread, per the sidebar moderator’s instructions. This isn’t the first LENR thread you have been asked to leave; you are not welcome on these threads. You wanna have a discussion about sumthin sumthin to do with timeliness of LENR stuff then open your own thread.
If this topic of two years ago was worthy of “discussion”
***It is.
then there should be
***Again, we don’t have to live up to your expectations which are simply an attempt to manipulate us and troll the thread. JimRob says when you’re asked to stop, then stop. We are kindly asking you to stop and we won’t be so kind moving forward. Troll somewhere else.
dozens of follow up experiments and papers expounding on the significance of 327.37mhz.
***Maybe there is. These are from ICCF21 so I am busy catching up and, again, I don’t care about your attempts to manipulate. You’re just threadjacking.
Post those if you got ‘em.
***Like JimRob says, LEAVE if you got any respect for FR.
I’ll wager I know as much about cold fusion as anyone here,
***I’m not interested in your wagers. I’m interested in kicking you to the curb because your only interest so far has been to hijack these threads. Get lost.
having studied, designed and built a Rossi contraption that would have made any excess heat obvious.
***There you go again, Rossi-Rossi-Rossi. Asked & Answered. https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4000502/posts?page=3#3
Unfortunately the field is filled with bad scientists
***Not really. The first hundred or so replications of the Pons Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect [PFAHE] came from the Who’s Who of Electrochemistry. Those guys regularly use calorimetry and electrolysis, while the physicists who were so threatened by these developments have almost never used them since their undergrad days. This was a turf war from the beginning and you’re engaging in it.
and charlatans. So I understand why you don’t like me commenting.
***The PFAHE has been replicated more than 150 times. You’re basically calling the entire field of electrochemistry “charlatans”. Asked & Answered.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4000502/posts?page=6#6
You judge the FIELD because of Rossi-Rossi-Rossi, which is a simple classic fallacy. Get lost, troll.
Please leave this thread.
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Such FReepers as who persist in polluting these threads have been asked to leave, and we are asking that they open their own threads if they have comments.
———————————————————————— —————————————————————
Sidebar Moderator Comments about LENR
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.
Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.
19 posted on 7/19/2021, 6:45:09 PM by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse]
You’ll find references to LENR in Biology on these threads [prior to their sidetracking on Covid19]
https://www.lenr-forum.com/search-result/66254/?pageNo=13&highlight=biology
https://www.bing.com/search?q=biology&q1=site%3Ae-catworld.com
Bigbob:
Please open your own thread if that’s what you want to discuss that subject with this troll. He is not welcome on these LENR threads and I would hope WW does not ping the list if you do open the thread.
Why are you so defensive about a legitimate question about the relevance of a LENR story from two years ago? What discussion are we supposed to engage in?
So many claims of excess heat and sterling engines running for months. Great. Show me one experiment that heats a body of water in a closed system. That isn’t hyper-skepticism, that’s high school physics. I’m sorry that bar has been too high.
I did my experiments very early on and worked with dozens of qualified people. You’re right I didn’t see results. Nor did anyone else who tried, at least in the range that would make it a viable product. Rossi was a fraud which many suspected and others feared. People are still pawing around in the topic and I am 100% for that. Science is good. Good science is better.
I will post whatever on-topic replies I see fit. You can reply with a scolding or recitation of the rules… that I have not violated.
Why are you so defensive about a legitimate
***There is nothing legitimate about you posting on LENR threads. You are a skeptopath.
question about the relevance of a LENR story from two years ago?
***We’ve been dealing with trolls like you for a decade. Why are you so sensitive about being shown the door as a troll when you obviously ARE one?
What discussion are we supposed to engage in?
***YOU? None. We are discussing the science and you are not invited. You have been asked to leave.
So many claims of excess heat
***Yes, more than 150 peer reviewed ones. Before your child Rossi entered the scene and LENR will be here long after you are escorted from these threads and Rossi has left the scene.
and sterling engines running for months. Great.
***You obviously aren’t here to extol such experiments so get lost, troll.
Show me one experiment that
***You’re doing the standard skeptopath thing of moving the goalposts. Asked & Answered — Moving the Goalposts.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=39#39
heats a body of water in a closed system. That isn’t hyper-skepticism, that’s high school physics. I’m sorry that bar has been too high.
***Your experiment has been performed dozens of times. You’re just not listening, skeptopath. Leave these threads.
I did my experiments very early on
***Bullshiite. You signed on here in 2011, which was well after those 150 replications of the PFAHE but during the height of Rossi-Rossi-Rossi. Rossi aint a scientist, he’s a tinkerer trying to become a millionaire and constantly moving the discussion to Rossi has ALSO been addressed on the Asked & Answered thread.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=3#3
and worked with dozens of qualified people.
***At this point I simply do not trust you and you’ve been asked to leave these threads. Get lost.
You’re right I didn’t see results.
***That’s because you don’t know how to do careful calorimetry. Ask Edmund Storms for advice, posted in the venerable journal Naturwissenschaften.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-010-0711-x
Nor did anyone else who tried,
***You’re being deceitful here, trying to tie [once again] Rossi’s In Mercato Veritas non-peer-reviewed experiments to LENR in general. You are simply a lying sack of shiite.
at least in the range that would make it a viable product.
***We’re discussing SCIENCE on these threads, not “Rossi’s product”. Get lost.
Rossi
***ROSSI ROSSI ROSSI. Asked & Answered. https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=3#3
was a fraud which many suspected and others feared.
***Kiss off with this Rossi stuff. Leave these threads.
People are still pawing around in the topic
***LENR was a good topic before your boy Rossi, and will be after Rossi. But you ain’t welcome on these LENR threads. Get lost, troll.
and I am 100% for that.
***I do not care what you are for or against. You have shown yourself. You’re here to disrupt, to troll, so get lost.
Science is good. Good science is better.
***You aint the one to criticize science, since you’re so poor at it.
I will post whatever on-topic replies I see fit.
***And we will start notifying the sidebar moderator of your trolling.
You can reply with a scolding or recitation of the rules…
***Which we do. But you don’t listen.
that I have not violated.
***Yes you have.
Will you please ask this guy bhl to leave these threads? His only interest is in disrupting.
LOL, LOL, LOL.....
You are ssoooo Freakin’ right...WTf.........
Not for nothing, Kevmo, but it seems you are only interested in reading things posted by people who say what you want them to say. Anything else and you go crying to the mods to have them removed.
OR to put it another way, you seen like the on screen version of a person who puts their fingers in their ears and says “lalalalallala” when someone tries to tell you something that doesn’t affirm your beliefs.
You don’t need to sick the mods on me, I’m leaving, and will make a point to just pass on by anytime I notice you are the poster.
I’ll leave you to your echo chamber now.
Freegards.
Asked & Answered
Tag Team Trolling
I apologize for not taking all this seriously.
Regards
Not for nothing, Kevmo, but it seems you are only interested in reading things posted by people who say what you want them to say.
***Nonsense. That Rossi-Rossi-Rossi threadjacking baloney is covered on the Asked & Answered thread. We’ve been putting up with Luddite Trolls for over a decade.
Anything else and you go crying to the mods to have them removed.
***This is the first time I’ve asked the sidebar moderator to get someone to leave since they posted their blurb about his this subject has a following and to only post stuff that furthers the discussion. bhl is here to “ disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson” Let’s see YOU put up with that kind of bullying and tag team trolling for over a decade and then I’ll come around and criticize YOU.
OR to put it another way, you seen like the on screen version of a person who puts their fingers in their ears and says “lalalalallala” when someone tries to tell you something that doesn’t affirm your beliefs.
***Dude. I keep tellin’ these guys to OPEN THEIR OWN THREADS. Invite me. That’s fine with me. But their interest is in threadjacking and I don’t put up with it. Neither should you.
You don’t need to sick the mods on me,
***You haven’t been trolling, so what gives? You’re standing up for an obvious ROssi-threadjacker troll? Are you his other login or sumthin?
I’m leaving, and will make a point to just pass on by anytime I notice you are the poster.
***I think you’re the one who is sensitive here. You can’t even witness a bit of back & forth 1998 style and it’s not addressed to you. Wow, talk about oversensitive.
I’ll leave you to your echo chamber now.
***Gee, thanks. Please show me where you put up with a decade of abuse from fellow freepers and I’ll join in just to criticize you. Should be fun for both of us.
Freegards.
***TTFN
Thank you for the apology. The context is that this topic has attracted a decade worth of abuse so we’re cleaning things up.
“we’re?”
May the FOUR be with you.
it is more than 3 decades of abuse.
I think I get it now.
It’s a script for SNL, but it was written back when they were funny. 30 years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.