Why are you so defensive about a legitimate
***There is nothing legitimate about you posting on LENR threads. You are a skeptopath.
question about the relevance of a LENR story from two years ago?
***We’ve been dealing with trolls like you for a decade. Why are you so sensitive about being shown the door as a troll when you obviously ARE one?
What discussion are we supposed to engage in?
***YOU? None. We are discussing the science and you are not invited. You have been asked to leave.
So many claims of excess heat
***Yes, more than 150 peer reviewed ones. Before your child Rossi entered the scene and LENR will be here long after you are escorted from these threads and Rossi has left the scene.
and sterling engines running for months. Great.
***You obviously aren’t here to extol such experiments so get lost, troll.
Show me one experiment that
***You’re doing the standard skeptopath thing of moving the goalposts. Asked & Answered — Moving the Goalposts.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=39#39
heats a body of water in a closed system. That isn’t hyper-skepticism, that’s high school physics. I’m sorry that bar has been too high.
***Your experiment has been performed dozens of times. You’re just not listening, skeptopath. Leave these threads.
I did my experiments very early on
***Bullshiite. You signed on here in 2011, which was well after those 150 replications of the PFAHE but during the height of Rossi-Rossi-Rossi. Rossi aint a scientist, he’s a tinkerer trying to become a millionaire and constantly moving the discussion to Rossi has ALSO been addressed on the Asked & Answered thread.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=3#3
and worked with dozens of qualified people.
***At this point I simply do not trust you and you’ve been asked to leave these threads. Get lost.
You’re right I didn’t see results.
***That’s because you don’t know how to do careful calorimetry. Ask Edmund Storms for advice, posted in the venerable journal Naturwissenschaften.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-010-0711-x
Nor did anyone else who tried,
***You’re being deceitful here, trying to tie [once again] Rossi’s In Mercato Veritas non-peer-reviewed experiments to LENR in general. You are simply a lying sack of shiite.
at least in the range that would make it a viable product.
***We’re discussing SCIENCE on these threads, not “Rossi’s product”. Get lost.
Rossi
***ROSSI ROSSI ROSSI. Asked & Answered. https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4000502/posts?page=3#3
was a fraud which many suspected and others feared.
***Kiss off with this Rossi stuff. Leave these threads.
People are still pawing around in the topic
***LENR was a good topic before your boy Rossi, and will be after Rossi. But you ain’t welcome on these LENR threads. Get lost, troll.
and I am 100% for that.
***I do not care what you are for or against. You have shown yourself. You’re here to disrupt, to troll, so get lost.
Science is good. Good science is better.
***You aint the one to criticize science, since you’re so poor at it.
I will post whatever on-topic replies I see fit.
***And we will start notifying the sidebar moderator of your trolling.
You can reply with a scolding or recitation of the rules…
***Which we do. But you don’t listen.
that I have not violated.
***Yes you have.
Just heat a body of water in a closed system reliably and you’d have trillion dollar invention. No one has.
What are your credentials for being this arbitrator of what level of skepticism is appropriate? Scientific papers published? University degrees? Successful experiments run?
You act as if you have a lot of go fund me projects looking for suckers. Any vested interest you should be disclosing?