Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.
Why are you so defensive about a legitimate question about the relevance of a LENR story from two years ago? What discussion are we supposed to engage in?
So many claims of excess heat and sterling engines running for months. Great. Show me one experiment that heats a body of water in a closed system. That isn’t hyper-skepticism, that’s high school physics. I’m sorry that bar has been too high.
I did my experiments very early on and worked with dozens of qualified people. You’re right I didn’t see results. Nor did anyone else who tried, at least in the range that would make it a viable product. Rossi was a fraud which many suspected and others feared. People are still pawing around in the topic and I am 100% for that. Science is good. Good science is better.
I will post whatever on-topic replies I see fit. You can reply with a scolding or recitation of the rules… that I have not violated.