[bitt]

p

[1Old Pro]

sheds bright light onto the Russiagate fraud and how journalistic corruption was key

Everyone knows this except CNN and MSNBC viewers.

[Seruzawa]

Scapegoat.

[ecomcon]

The one who belongs in jail is Clinton.

[Candor7]

And when will Hillary be made to bend over and pay?

[blueunicorn6]

Hillary Clinton is a soulless sack of water walking around.

[Ann Archy]

Not sure if I buy this.

[AndyJackson]

hoping to be appointed as the top cybersecurity official in the soon-to-be-inaugurated Clinton administration

An idiot lawyer thinks he should have a job that is a requires sophisticated technical knowledge. The fact that people don't laugh their asses off at all the unqualified people who think they should have this job, like this idiot, is why we have this problem.

[Yardstick]

Interesting that Durham is being allowed to proceed apparently unimpeded by Biden & Garland. Makes me wonder to what degree internal Dem feuding may be in play here between the Clinton and Obama camps.

[Guenevere]

Greenwald is an excellent journalist, in a very real sense.

[Kalam]

I hope this leads to bigger fish.

I’m afraid it will only be the deep state way; to offer up a sacrifice by throwing someone under the bus.

In doing so, they will continue to keep the demonic-rats, the Clinton cabal’s and their own crimes hidden.

[zeestephen]

I read the entire indictment last week.

The single charge looks very thin to me.

Durham claims that Sussmann told FBI general counsel James Baker that he - Sussmann - was not acting on the behalf of a client.

Multiple problems with that claim...

(1) Besides James Baker, there is no witness to that statement, no audio, no documents, and no contemporaneous notes.

(2) After the meeting, Baker immediately called the FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence. The Assistant Director did take hand written notes. One of those notes explicitly says that Sussmann "Represents DNC, Clinton Foundation, etc."

(3) More than a year after this meeting, Sussmann, under oath, told a Congressional committee that was acting on behalf of a client.

(4) There are several different ways to interpret what Sussmann meant if he did tell Baker that he - Sussmann - was NOT acting on behalf of a client.

(5) Also, FBI General Counsel James Baker would be in serious trouble if he - Baker - did NOT ask Sussman if Sussman was working on behalf of a client. If Baker did fail to ask Sussmann, then Baker has as much motive to lie as Sussman does.

In any event, the indictment is a very important historical document that explains what happened at the birth of the Trump Russia Hoax.

[gattaca]

bmp for lrt

[Fledermaus]

Yawn

SQUIRREL

[Henchster]

Sussman's claims that he was just acting as a concerned private citizen were negated by numerous documents obtained by Durham's investigation, including billing records where he charged the Clinton campaign for his work in trying to disseminate this story, including his meeting with Baker at FBI's headquarters.

This idiot is being thrown under the bus by the Biden DOJ because he is even dumber than Joe.

[NoLibZone]

Lack of activity teachers even our “guests “ that’s such political tactics are not that big of a deal.

Sadly I’ve seen more interest on free republic in which type of oil to use on seasoning pans.
Sad sad times