Posted on 08/24/2021 6:51:49 PM PDT by Robwin
Babbitt crossed a line that had been clearly delineated. The police obviously felt it was a last stand. The potential danger was obvious. Babbitt’s shooting appears to have stopped the forward movement of the crowd. All this happened on a day when the vice president’s life had been threatened, and when police were being savagely beaten elsewhere in the building.
Could the mob possibly have been stopped without Babbitt’s death? Maybe. Perhaps there was a way to have avoided deadly force. But it’s not clear to me what that way would have been — and it is clear that if Babbitt had gone through that doorway, an out-of-control situation would have deteriorated further.
...
This was a riot, Ashli Babbitt was at its vanguard and, based on what I’ve seen, the police officer who shot her was doing his job.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Was there not 3 or 4 Capitol officers that committed suicide? Any possible connection?
Thankfully, there is no statute of limitations for murder. One day perhaps we’ll have a legitimate AG and the DOJ will bring the house down on this despicable murderer.
Over the last 2 years we’ve all seen bodycam footage of justifiable police uses of deadly force where:
1) the officer’s name was immediately released.
2) said officer was automatically suspended from work pending investigation.
3) despite video proof the officer, his family and fellow officers were harassed legally, and physically threatened by interested parties for the victim and sometimes the local DA.
There is no justice.
#*&% Communists
She had no weapons. It was a murder.
Shameful lies of small men.
I read this earlier and I completely disagree with the premise thaat Ashli thru the door would have stampeded the crowd.
The author fails to acknowledge that
a) there were officers in front of the door before Ashli got there and they moved out because
b) 4 or more additional officers with riot gear moved up the stairwell towards the door to relieve the officers moving out, and
c) within a minute or so, the additional officers would have had command of the door, and
d) the brandishing of a weapon to an intelligent person would have stopped that person and we cannot argue that Ashli was below intellect, being an intel officer of rank
the author tries hard but it’s a big fail
The White House has a deadly force policy. As does the Supreme Court. Congress does too. Don’t mess with any of the three branch of government. This isn’t that difficult.
Break out the chest waders,
the sh*t's getting deep.
Another Hate-America commie whose name should be remembered.
And the man casually walking across the hallway in the background... prolly the action signal.
It was staged.
>> 4 or more additional officers with riot gear moved up the stairwell towards the door
One was seriously cross-eyed.
>> an unarmed woman, who isn’t breaking anything
The “glass” pane was effortlessly push out of the frame on cue. Ashli was then assisted into the window frame.
Once the gunman was in position, the nearest actor signals the second actor who in turn facilitated Ashli’s entrance into the window frame.
Everything this POS says is pure lunacy and BS.
That sounds about right. The script was already written, and the actors were all in place.
The video referenced in this chat was produced shortly after the “incident”. It’s a compilation of the various smartphone footage captured at the “scene”. If I never saw the video, I’d be chiming along with the rest of you — scary.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3932002/posts
I know my position is unwelcome. But every detail & report supports a false flag.
When considering this event to be real, so many things don’t add up.
I’d rather know Ashli was alive, and simply made a bad decision. Better that than dead for making a bad decision.
“Babbitt’s shooting appears to have stopped the forward movement of the crowd.”
False. The author is a failure at logic and grammar. Babbi did not actively shoot. She was passively shot. Her murder did not stop the forward movement.
The LA Times has mastered the art of deception and cannot handle the truth. John and Ken on KFI said that the LA Times would increase their readership if they wrote positively about Trump. Of course, John and Ken announced in November 2020 that the general election was fair. Thus, both the LA Times and John and Ken are ancient relics from a bygone era when they had customers.
How do they explain an alleged insurrection was stopped with one pistol?
It looked like a planned hit to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.