Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Interact and Interfere with SARS‐CoV‐2 Surface Proteins and Cell Receptors to Inhibit Infectivity
nih.gov ^ | June 24, 2021 | Mehmet Altay Unal, 1 Fatma Bayrakdar, 2 Hasan Nazir, 3 Omur Besbinar, 1 , 4 Cansu Gurcan, 1 , 4 Neus

Posted on 07/31/2021 4:21:43 PM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last
To: ransomnote
You’re a fool.

He seems nice.


141 posted on 07/31/2021 10:33:58 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Is it beneficial to blow your nose or sneeze into Graphene Oxide Nanosheets if you have COVID-19?


142 posted on 07/31/2021 10:35:07 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
I doubt that ransomnote has any idea of how to sift through this paper and is counting on everyone else being in that same boat. The game is to post some eye-glazing boilerplate, and then tell the reader what to think about it.

You see the irony, don't you? You're posting some eye-glazing drivel and telling readers what to think about it, and how to read.

143 posted on 07/31/2021 10:35:12 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

see my post #140


144 posted on 07/31/2021 10:35:30 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

If you re-read the (translated) version from the University, it looks like legal cover-your-ass-boilerplate: not so much, “we absolutely and definitively reject and refute the idea that any such experiments ever happened” but “we have no knowledge of any such experiments nor any official blessing or authorization of them”.

Nice try, though.

I still rate it “weakly plausible” at best so far.


145 posted on 07/31/2021 10:36:30 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides; Pelham
So I guess you also don’t have the slightest clue about “what did they admit”. Maybe nobody “admitted” anything and the opening poster was in a state of confusion.

May I direct you to Pelham's posts just upthread a bit. He broke it down for the dummie section.

Read them, then realize you just became of of Mrs Mith's idiots.

You're welcome.


146 posted on 07/31/2021 10:37:04 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: OftheOhio
There is information from the manufacturers that Graphene Oxide could be used as a possible contrast agent.

Specific source / link for that, please?

147 posted on 07/31/2021 10:37:42 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
Hey, pretty good GE.

Originality is always best.


148 posted on 07/31/2021 10:38:22 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
trusting Trump’s vaccine

Not Trump's vaccine. You know better.

- or any vaccine for that matter.

No, pretty much just the poison covid vax's. And again, you know better.


149 posted on 07/31/2021 10:42:10 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"You see the irony, don't you? You're posting some eye-glazing drivel and telling readers what to think about it, and how to read".

Oh? Well I mentioned boilerplate and not drivel. And anything I quoted came from the very article that you posted. So apparently you're confirming it was eye-glazing.

And just to be clear, if I wished to quote drivel I'd have quoted you rather than the article that you posted. I consider you something of an expert in drivel.

150 posted on 07/31/2021 10:44:32 PM PDT by Pelham (No more words, now we fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

You still can’t understand why I posted the article even after I spelled it out in post #23?

PS: I don’t find the article eye glazing, but I like science more than most.


151 posted on 07/31/2021 10:48:43 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: bagster

yes it is Trump’s vaccine. Just like the clinical treatments that have been developed under Warp Speed are Trump’s drugs. And we’re fortunate to have them. The last six months have shown us how a different admin would have done - they’re still playing mask hide and seek games.

I hardly believe Q would be speaking against vaccines, rather traitorous if they did, dont you think? Vote for Trump, trust the plan, trust the Q who knows Trumps plan, trust Trump, don’t take Trump’s vaccine, Vote for Trump? naw not even the QanonBagster is that duplicitious.


152 posted on 07/31/2021 10:52:28 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

https://1stgraphene.com/ https://www.studyfinds.org/nasal-spray-flu-vaccine-covid-nanoparticles-stops-all-strains/


153 posted on 07/31/2021 10:58:28 PM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could fight - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
That remark, was after my post to you.

Had you read it as of my post to you?

The issue is that if one is attempting to error on the side of caution, then the Hippocratic "First, do no harm" suggests that a Mythbusters-type "plausible" suggests one should dig deeper concerning a particular accusation/worry about the jabs, on the side of caution.

The other issue is going off half-cocked on things not well-established, allows most or all legitimate concerns to be slandered as "nuttery".

That being said, a discussion of computational binding coefficients for various spike components, to various formulations of graphic oxide sheets, with different ligands, doesn't go particularly far as even putative evidence that it is currently being considered, let alone formulated, let alone in sporadic use, let alone a "secret sauce" in any of the jabs, let alone in all manufacturers' jabs.

154 posted on 07/31/2021 11:01:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: bagster

😎Thanks. I try now and then.


155 posted on 07/31/2021 11:07:42 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
And just to be clear, if I wished to quote drivel I'd have quoted you rather than the article that you posted. I consider you something of an expert in drivel.

Now you're just being mean for mean's sake, Pelham. You know damn well Ransomnote don't post no drivel. Don't be so emotional.


156 posted on 07/31/2021 11:09:09 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
buried in “Discussion” : “no experimental work was offered to validate the computational observations” in silico is not in vivo . So what’s the point? But someone is supposed to be keeping me from knowing that secret point?

"No experimental work" refers to the previous Raval study, not the author's own study. In the "Results" section regarding his own study the author writes:

"In order to interrogate the possible implications of such interactions experimentally, we performed in vitro tests using infectious, wild‐type SARS‐CoV‐2 virions. "

He didn't bother to "bury" the "in vitro" regarding his own study, it's right there in the text. Apparently reading comprehension lessons would benefit you.

157 posted on 07/31/2021 11:17:25 PM PDT by Pelham (No more words, now we fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Seems to me there’s a whole lot of interest in keeping Americans and westerners in particular from trusting Trump’s vaccine - or any vaccine for that matter.

*******************************************************************🤣 Another conspiracy theory —everybody’s got one it seems.


158 posted on 07/31/2021 11:17:27 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
yes it is Trump’s vaccine.

Unless you can provide photos or video of Trump in a white lab coat mixing chemicals in beakers and tubes and looking in microscopes, then I'm afraid you're mistaken.

For them to be 'Trump's vaccines', he would have had to be involved in the process of developing and actually MAKING the vaccines. This is just simple logic even you should be able to figure out.

I understand you have a political motive when you call them, 'Trump's vaccines'. But guess what? Politically motivated, agenda driven rhetoric doesn't change actual facts.

So no, vax boy. These are definitely NOT Trump's vaccines. And your attempt to make them so is cheap garbage. Save that stuff for Mrs Mith's idiots. They'll believe anything.

Tell me this, government man. Are you telling me that Trump is in league with Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Big Pharama, CDC, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, the fake news media, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and the entire derp state? Is THAT what you're trying to tell me?

If it is, I must insist that your head is in your coolo.

p.s. Q knows exactly what this entire covid hoax is all about, up to and including the fake poison vax hoax.

#TheyHaveItAll


159 posted on 07/31/2021 11:18:46 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Your guess is wrong. As usual you project your own idiocy and cluelessness onto others.


160 posted on 07/31/2021 11:56:10 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson