[Pelham]

"You see the irony, don't you? You're posting some eye-glazing drivel and telling readers what to think about it, and how to read".

Oh? Well I mentioned boilerplate and not drivel. And anything I quoted came from the very article that you posted. So apparently you're confirming it was eye-glazing.

And just to be clear, if I wished to quote drivel I'd have quoted you rather than the article that you posted. I consider you something of an expert in drivel.

[ransomnote]

You still can’t understand why I posted the article even after I spelled it out in post #23?

PS: I don’t find the article eye glazing, but I like science more than most.

[bagster]

And just to be clear, if I wished to quote drivel I'd have quoted you rather than the article that you posted. I consider you something of an expert in drivel.

Now you're just being mean for mean's sake, Pelham. You know damn well Ransomnote don't post no drivel. Don't be so emotional.