You see the irony, don't you? You're posting some eye-glazing drivel and telling readers what to think about it, and how to read.
Oh? Well I mentioned boilerplate and not drivel. And anything I quoted came from the very article that you posted. So apparently you're confirming it was eye-glazing.
And just to be clear, if I wished to quote drivel I'd have quoted you rather than the article that you posted. I consider you something of an expert in drivel.