see my post #140
Had you read it as of my post to you?
The issue is that if one is attempting to error on the side of caution, then the Hippocratic "First, do no harm" suggests that a Mythbusters-type "plausible" suggests one should dig deeper concerning a particular accusation/worry about the jabs, on the side of caution.
The other issue is going off half-cocked on things not well-established, allows most or all legitimate concerns to be slandered as "nuttery".
That being said, a discussion of computational binding coefficients for various spike components, to various formulations of graphic oxide sheets, with different ligands, doesn't go particularly far as even putative evidence that it is currently being considered, let alone formulated, let alone in sporadic use, let alone a "secret sauce" in any of the jabs, let alone in all manufacturers' jabs.