Posted on 07/29/2021 7:48:24 AM PDT by ransomnote
LA QUINTA COLUMNA AT THE XXVII HUMANITARIAN CONFERENCE OF COMUSAV / CONUVIVE (rumble.com)I can believe that this important content may be incomplete –that the biowarfare against us may have additional means and strategies.
The video is recorded in Spanish and provides English subtitles. I deeply appreciate the work of those who prepared the English subtitles: Gracias!There are minor errors in the subtitles, and not speaking the language meant that I sometimes missed the intention of content by accepting it as literal statement when it was an analysis of theories for the purpose of showing why they don’t work.
~~~Transcription begins~~~
La Quinta Columna wants to make it clear from the beginning that we have the obligation, we have the obligation to be united because we are in the same battle to give the best of ourselves because what is at stake is precisely the future of all species.
Depending on the strength and momentum that we put into this task will depend on the future of all humanity. We are right now at the turning point from which things can begin to change. And in this sense La Quinta Columna is going to summarize what has been the result of its research during this year and a half, but above all and especially during the last two months.
SNIP
“….there was a new phenomenon that for a while we tried to deny, although today it’s evident because of the millions of videos on social media, and we have been able to even measure it with devices: teslameters, magnometers. I’ am referring to the magnetic or pseudo-magnetic phenomenon that people acquire after inoculation.
A magnetic phenomenon on the one hand, but also one that turns inoculated people into superconductors., and also stores energy that can be measured with a multimeter in certain parts, such as the forehead, for example, So from there we started to look for what kind of materials, or, better said, nanomaterials can cause those kinds of properties inside the body and we came up with some of the candidates.
One of them initially was graphene. Graphene inside the body acquires magnetic properties and is a superconductor. It serves for energy storage and condensation and was a strong candidate.
Without yet having any knowledge of what was inside the vial, we realized that the industry or rather the stock market of the graphene industry had high uptrend peaks just as the covid-19 vaccination campaign was starting at the beginning of the year, late December and early January.
But also, quite curiously, during the flu vaccination campaign.
When we have seen the possibilities that graphene has, or rather, that graphene oxide nanoparticles have inside the body when it comes to neuromodulation, and when it comes to picking up neuronal electrophysiological effects for brain mapping, we have realized the possibility that graphene is being injected.
Can graphene be injected? Yes. Graphene can be injected. And, in fact, some scientific papers have already raised the possibility that it could be used as a nanoadjuvant in vaccines.
With that hypothesis of suspicion, we did what anyone could have done and what I also recommend that you can do if you have access to a vial. We had access to a sealed vial from Pfizer, and by means of a request for services to a university, specifically in my name, (3:29 in video, holds up document) it was sent for analysis of the vial, where we were looking for the material in question: graphene.
After some time of investigation by Dr. Pablo Campra, Madrid, Doctor in Chemical Sciences, Bachelor in Biological Sciences and member of the University of Almeria, we obtained this preliminary report where we are told that there is indeed solid evidence of graphene oxide in the sample. .
It is also the main component of what they wrongly called a vaccine.
From here and with this solid evidence, which will be further complemented with other spectroscopy techniques that can be done. Those that have been are transmission electron microscopy; EMF techniquest, also, optical microscopy; and ultraviolet radiation spectroscopy, which coincide with the peak wavelength of graphene oxide.
From here we began to study the toxicity or cytotoxicity that graphene oxide has on the body.
Pay attention to the finding: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenecity, thrombi.
Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting.
Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations.
Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione – which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants –causes alternation of the immune system, collapse of the immune system, and cytokine storm.
Inhaled graphene oxide spreads evenly throughout the alveolar tract and causes bilateral pneumonias.
Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus loss of taste and smell, possible loss of taste and smell: anosmia.
In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-Cov-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe Covid-19. When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological Covid-19.
So, from here we started to see what possible compounds and treatments could degrade graphene oxide.
And look what we found: N-acetylcysteine or glutathione administered degrade it because what glutathione does is counteract free radicals and oxidants, all the toxins that can enter the body. And we discovered that there were about 300 clinical trials where certain hospitals and certain universities were using N-acetylcysteine with incredible results.
For example, 100 patients with saturation levels below 50% practically dead – bluntly speaking –with bilateral pneumonias, within an hour of intravenous glutathione or N-acetylcysteine (N.A.C.) administration they made it. They were taken off ventilators and everything.
We now fully understand why those treatments worked: because they addressed all the symptoms of the disease supposedly caused by SARS-CoV-2.
Given that to date there is no scientific evidence of an actual sequencing and isolation of SARS-CoV-2, we suspect with many credible indications that Covid-19 is actually the side effect of the introduction of the graphene oxide into the body by different ways.
And I say “different routes” because, although they were withdrawn at the time, masks containing graphene oxide nanoparticles have been introduced and are still being marketed. These masks have been introduced and are still being marketed by companies such as Nanografi.
So we have masks with graphene oxide, but also graphene oxide nanoparticles introduced in PCR tests; graphene oxide is also present in antigen tests; hydrogels also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles; intranasal vaccines also, since graphene oxide in aerosols is more potent, as is the supposed SARS-CoV-2.
Intranasal vaccines are also prepared, for example, by Turkey. They are made by Nanografi for Covid-19 and influenza.
We know that, naturally, graphene oxide is eliminated by the levels of glutathione in the body, and that is why we suspect they propose a second, third, and even fourth dose every so often, so that you have your considerable dose of graphene oxide.
In short, we are talking about the simultaneous and gradual mass poisoning of the entire world population.
Think, if the preliminary report of a professor of a public university in Almeria – and I know that the same study is being done in other European and some Latin American Universities – if it determined that there is graphene oxide in the vials, how is it [ransomnote: 'it is'] possible that graphene oxide is injected if the masks were removed because it caused pulmonary affections because of this nanoparticle?
We are talking about a crime against humanity with the complicity of governments, or at least their participation?
When we study glutathione, we realize that it begins to fall from the age of 30 onwards, but above all it falls considerably from the age of 65 onwards. In fact, Covid-19 takes a heavier toll on older people, apart from those who are immunocompromised and have other pathologies.
When we study glutathione, we realize that children have high glutathione reserves because of their youth and the Covid-19 disease itself hardly has an impact on children.
Similarly, glutathione is especially low in the obese population and we realize that it is precisely the obese who are most affected by Covid-19.
We realize that glutathione is related to Vitamin D. Low levels of glutathione are low levels of vitamin D and it is precisely patients with Covid-19 who have low levels of Vitamin D.
We realize that athletes have high levels of glutathione endogenously which are secreted with intense exercise and precisely athletes are hardly affected by Covid-19.
Everything that we have subsequently studied only increases and corroborates the hypothesis that the supposed SARS-Cov-2 of the official version is precisely the graphene oxide.
And that all the elements of protection, of supposed protection, that we have been given: masks, PCR tests, swabs, antigen tests and vaccine – the wrongly called vaccine – are precisely all those elements that will potentially cause the disease to develop in the future. And why do I say ‘in the future’?
When we studied the electromagnetic phenomenon we realized that graphene oxide has what is called an “electronic absorption band”. The electronic excitation, it’s magnetic resonance is precisely in the third bandwidth of the 5G technology, that one is that is being tended right now, and that, remember, has been with us throughout the pandemic.
As absolutely everything started we have had three ‘nets’:
The first is that 5G terrestrial antenna that have never stopped being placed – because only the antenna operators worked – and that are curiously 8 out of 10 of those antennas are placed near geriatrics and nursing homes in their immediate vicinity, which has been precisely the most affected population.
Another inner net: precisely of graphene, according to the preliminary report of the vial of this university.
And an external net, which is the one used by space satellites to supposedly provide 5G coverage.
Incredibly, we are narrating a science fiction movie, but believe me, today nanoscience, neuroscience and biotechnology have advanced tremendously.
We have only made an approximation in the realm of science and behind the back of civil society.
Can a person be controlled or neurocontrolled remotely wirelessly?
Yes, it can be done and is probably being done in a disguised way and that may explain some of the anomalous behavioral behavior of the population, especially those who have been inoculated or who have received doses of graphene oxide by different ways.
As I say, I know I am drawing a science fiction movie, but at the heights we are at it can be difficult to really believe in something.
In this sense, we say that Covid-19 is only the collateral effect of the introduction of the nanocomposite by different ways and we suspect that it was introduced in the 2019 anti-flu campaign.
As I was saying, graphene oxide has an absorption band from which it oxidizes much more quickly when a small button is turned on to provide 5G coverage or to perform a technological test.
Do you think it is a coincidence that Wuhan – where the pangolin and bat soup came from as distraction elements – is the first city in the world with the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019 and that all previous flu vaccination with graphene oxide probably started from there.
When excited, graphene oxide multiplies frequencies.
With a minimum signal, it oxidizes much faster and breaks the balance between glutathione levels and the toxicity of the organism, generating bilateral pneumonia, altering the behavior of the immune system which cannot cope as soon as the neutrophils try to phagocytize it as if it were a pathogen, as if it were SARS-CoV-2.
We shared an article today, if I can screen share I’m going to try to do that, can you let me know if you’re seeing it on screen? 15:00 minute mark.
https://i.imgur.com/aqncymr.png
Well let’s see: ‘Graphene oxide is detected in the body by specialized cells (neutrophils) of the immune system.’ Just as if it were a pathogen.
The body, the immune system, doesn’t care if there is a biological agent because this never behaved like a biological agent.
There are incubation periods if biological.
It is not possible that in residences in our country in Spain, such as Matacaz in Barcelona, half of a residence died in 4 hours.
If it is a biological agent, it does not cause bilateral pneumonia, but rather asymmetric pneumonia: they usually enter through the right lung due to symmetry.But half of a residence that had previously been vaccinated against influenza could not die.
We observed that the higher the flu vaccination, the higher the mortality of Covid-19, and logically we saw a relationship.
The other relationship was with electromagnetic fields. What we did not know is that there was a marking on each of these people to make them a target population for the electromagnetic focus.
A lethal weapon that now makes people magnetic and logically you will understand that if they interact with those radiation sources at a specific frequency and quality, they cause oxidation, they break the redox balance of the oxidative biomarkers of the organism, causing the Covid-19 disease.
We know this is crystal clear, and we have all the scientific articles that prove it. One of them is this one:
‘Researchers at Karolinska Institute, the University of Manchester and Chalmers University of Technology have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in a manner similar to pathogens, possibly leading to safer biomedical applications in the future.’
https://i.imgur.com/tRYssbh.png
What you are seeing here is graphene oxide being attacked by neutrophils which are, lets say, cells of the immune system that try to phagocytize it, try to engulf it: to coagulate it. That’s why graphene oxide generates clots and thrombi.
‘Graphene oxide is currently being studied for use in various drug delivery methods and other medical and non-medical applications. However, it is of critical importance to understand how these materials interact with the body.
The study shows that neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell specialized in combating infections – just like a pathogen – release so-called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs, the most common type of white blood cells) when encountering GO (graphene oxide).
NETs are made up of a “spider-web” of DNA decorated with proteins that help neutrophils to destroy microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi.
The researchers found that GO causes specific changes in the lipid composition of the cell membrane of neutrophils leading to the release of NETs.
They could also show that antioxidant treatment – such as with NAC and glutathione – reversed this process.
That is why treatments with glutathione have worked, and that is why treatments with n-acetylcysteine (NAC), which is a precursor to glutathione, because they work providing the army with antioxidant reserves to deal with a toxic substance, a poisoning, that has been introduced into the body by different ways.
In a companion study published in Nanoscale, it was shown that GO degraded in NETs, much like bacteria and other pathogens.
“Taken together, these studies show that GO can be trapped and degraded in NETs just like pathogens.”
I want to tell you that we have published in our website at least 70 studies that reflect everything we are saying and manifesting here.
On the other hand, I have been asked about the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. That goes another way.
What it does is to oxygenate the cell, it prepares it so that it is not easily destroyed by this toxicant.
What glutathione would do is to provide the army with more numbers of soldiers in terms of glutathione to deal with toxins.
What we have found, as I say, is that most of the treatments that have been with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or glutathione and even with other antioxidants such as astaxanthin, which is a powerful antioxidant, have been very favorable treatments for the patients.
And also, curiously and suspiciously, found that these health institutions are literally governed by evil; it is a psychopathy without previous history; we had never seen the history of such psychopathy.
By June 17 that the FDA tried to stop the marketing of N-acetylcysteine after it had been used for 57 years as a normal and ordinary mococcolytic. It was a very suspicious thing to do, wasn’t it?
[ransomnote: The FDA just inexplicably ruled that N-acetylcysteine (N.A.C.) will now only be available by prescription. No reason was provided.
We know what the CDC/FDA do to the availability of helpful prescriptions, don't we? Sources are drying up ahead of the ban, but you can still buy it online and in some shops]
So this is basically my exposition.
Any doubts that you may have about the studies that we have carried out at La Quinta Columna, well, there is simply something that is very conclusive, and that is the preliminary report of a renowned professor of a public university here in Spain.
We are very close to providing complementary evidence to give more strength to this report in which we are already told that there is solid and proven evidence that there is graphene oxide in the sample we sent.
Simply, for Colonel Tamayo and Judge Giorgianni: Regardless of the fact that we obviously think that SARS-COV-2 is precisely graphene oxide – and we can prove it – or at least it behaves exactly and exhaustively the same, how is it possible that graphene oxide is injected through the vials?
How is it possible if the masks were really withdrawn because they caused pulmonary affections due to toxicity? What are we talking about gentlemen?
Here I have tried to make the exposition as synthesized as possible so any doubt that may be generated by the manifestation that I have given here can be clarified throughout the time left we have.
ransomnote: May God bless and protect these researchers and shield them from the attacks of those conducting the biowarfare against us. Amen.
More information: https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/COMUSAV-CONUVIVE.html
Many are already aware of the work that the team of Spanish researchers that make up La Quinta Columna have been doing.
They are the ones who have had the courage to get a vial of vaccination and send it for analysis to a renowned Spanish university through Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, who is working on recording all the results of the analysis in a report that promises to be more conclusive than the preliminary one he prepared for the general public at the beginning of last week.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PING!!!
Graphene Ping!.............................
PING
I aint watching any asswipe talk about that garbage.
Thank you!
That is why I have called it a name : *Vaxxine*.
What the 'jab' is, in reality, called an "analgesic" .
It doesn't cure covid (!), it doesn't prevent covid (!),
it just ameliorates (masks) the virus symptoms to a more tolerable level.
It's like taking aspirin for a head cold, or the flu.
bkmk
Now then, a little more science, to bring this report into perspective:
The report says:
“Pay attention to the finding: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenecity, thrombi.” ........”Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting. ...... “Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations ......” Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione – which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants –causes alternation of the immune system, collapse of the immune system, and cytokine storm.”
So, for the science: And if you’ve had the Pfizer shots and you have never had any of the above reactions (which is the case with the large majority that have had the Pfizer shots), then can those statements above be taken as unequivocal, unconditional absolute “results” of those shots.
How can somethings said to be so certain not happen most of the time????
God bless this team (La Quinta Columna/5th column) for doing the research our own scientists should be doing.
Thanks for the transcript and ping.
You might be interested in the data/charts at the following link:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3979882/posts?page=399#399
Maybe it's not in all the vials?
Maybe the dosage varies for various batches?
Maybe some people have enough glutathione to handle it?
Maybe some anti-vaxer sabotaged the experiment?
Or maybe .....
👍Interesting study and theories. The final report and additional sampling/testing of more vials should be even more interesting.
Are there any electrical engineers on that research team?
Zactly...
A mitigation of symptoms is therapy NOT a vaccine
Maybe, maybe, maybe is not an explanation for why the MAJORITY of people do not have those reactions.
If it were “system” to the vaccines’ formula, MOST people would be having those reactions, but that is not the case.
I think greater study will find (a) genetic reasons, and/or (b) reasons related to preexisting medical conditions, and (a) or (b) related to the spike protein itself whether from the virus or the vaccine.
Maybe, maybe, maybe is not an explanation for why the MAJORITY of people do not have those reactions.
If it were “system” to the vaccines’ formula, MOST people would be having those reactions, but that is not the case.
I think greater study will find (a) genetic reasons, and/or (b) reasons related to preexisting medical conditions, and (a) or (b) related to the spike protein itself whether from the virus or the vaccine.
*********************************************************************************
MAYBE:
(a) genetic reasons
(b) reasons related to preexisting medical conditions
(c) (a) or (b) related to the spike protein itself whether from the virus or the vaccine.
Please note that a, b, c, are also really GREAT maybes which is why I left one of my choices as maybe....
to allow for any and all additional maybes.
indicating that there are many things which could be possible which we do NOT KNOW without more studies.
Now then, a little more science, to bring this report into perspective:
The report says:
“Pay attention to the finding: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenecity, thrombi.” ........”Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting. ...... “Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations ......” Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione – which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants –causes alternation of the immune system, collapse of the immune system, and cytokine storm.”
So, for the science: And if you’ve had the Pfizer shots and you have never had any of the above reactions (which is the case with the large majority that have had the Pfizer shots), then can those statements above be taken as unequivocal, unconditional absolute “results” of those shots.
How can somethings said to be so certain not happen most of the time????
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What is odd is that 80% or so of the trial participants had adverse reactions. The pharmas only reported mild ones (fever, chills, redness/sore arm etc.)
For this reason a researcher noted that PFizer failed to field a ‘double-blind’ trial as required because if you felt awful, you knew you were not in the placebo group.
So either 20% had saline or tolerated graphene?
Whistleblower Dr. McGreavey believes there is a viral version of the ‘shot’ with the spike proteins and that the pharmas were shipping saline as doses at some rate to keep the adverse event rate down. Can’t have everyone sick or someone might suspect something?
So either there is more than one ‘attack’ in this biowarfare or those at the very top are duping a portion of their own, very few have the ‘true’ story and he was reporting what his division gov science was being told. That way those driving the plandemic have containment of information - they probably didn’t trust him all that much and if he had been told accurately that it was graphne in the vials, he would be whistle blowing that too right now.
They do have viruses, he personally worked on viruses, China and Wuhan have them - so if they told him pfizer was shipping that stuff he would believe it.
Or maybe sometimes they use a severe flu virus here, and the boost the appearance or reputation of it there, with graphene. Dr. Yeadon, Dr. Malone and others have said that Covid (SARS2) is NOT ‘novel’. The claim it was new and our immune system has never seen it before, and that’s why it’s a plague etc., is false.
But spreading it around while deploying graphene at the same time would ‘work’ because a person battling graphene is goign to have a harder time with the flu.
I forget who it was who said that back when some hospitals were showing doctors and nurses working in complete respiration moon suits, it must be that they were pumping spike proteins into the air. The patients in those vignettes were extremely ill and in fatal decline and all these space suited doctors and nurses were rushing around, and we were being supposedly shown that Covid was as terrifying as ebola.
Well, the spike-in-the-air would explain the moon suits and the extreme decline of all patients in those particular wards, but what if it was graphene-in-the-air?
A horrible thought - ventilators. Were some of those dispensing graphene? If the seal around the mouth is complete, that would reduce the risk to unwitting nursing staff (less ‘turnover’).
From the start, I had seen info, videos, microscopic evaluation of nasal swabs that seemed to demonstrate there was hydrogel on the swabs. Then elder care facilities reported little to no Covid-19 until the residents were tested (swabs).
Those perpetrating this have limitations and considerations to manage (how well do they need to control the bioagent) so having both graphene and a sever flue virus that has been weaponized to match graphene poisoning would give them great versatility. They were have somethign of a ‘feedback loop’ which they could use to modulate the effects where and when they needed it.
Forcing people with the flu, falsely diagnosed with Covid into an elder care homes, where the residents were not initially wearing masks (no graphene exposure) would them an excuse to test, and for those seniors the combo of the flu and graphene would likely be ‘too much.’
Sorry, I drifted off your question thinking of the possibilities.
I recall a report of a shipment of Pfizer seized and analyzed, and 38% of the shipment was deemed active. I have no idea who is telling the truth here - active how? At the time I thought that it had dropped below refrigeration levels and had become inactive. Maybe there are severe flu or even some real, ‘novel’ weaponized flu doses out there called ‘vaccines’ which really do have to be kept at extremely cold temperatures, and there are all these graphene doses too.
Production of virus not keeping up? More graphene! As I said, they have considerations and having more than one vector would give them options.
Back to the thread, see # 19.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
