Replies

Now then, a little more science, to bring this report into perspective:

The report says:

“Pay attention to the finding: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenecity, thrombi.” ........”Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting. ...... “Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations ......” Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione – which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants –causes alternation of the immune system, collapse of the immune system, and cytokine storm.”

So, for the science: And if you’ve had the Pfizer shots and you have never had any of the above reactions (which is the case with the large majority that have had the Pfizer shots), then can those statements above be taken as unequivocal, unconditional absolute “results” of those shots.

How can somethings said to be so certain not happen most of the time????
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What is odd is that 80% or so of the trial participants had adverse reactions. The pharmas only reported mild ones (fever, chills, redness/sore arm etc.)
For this reason a researcher noted that PFizer failed to field a ‘double-blind’ trial as required because if you felt awful, you knew you were not in the placebo group.

So either 20% had saline or tolerated graphene?

Whistleblower Dr. McGreavey believes there is a viral version of the ‘shot’ with the spike proteins and that the pharmas were shipping saline as doses at some rate to keep the adverse event rate down. Can’t have everyone sick or someone might suspect something?

So either there is more than one ‘attack’ in this biowarfare or those at the very top are duping a portion of their own, very few have the ‘true’ story and he was reporting what his division gov science was being told. That way those driving the plandemic have containment of information - they probably didn’t trust him all that much and if he had been told accurately that it was graphne in the vials, he would be whistle blowing that too right now.

They do have viruses, he personally worked on viruses, China and Wuhan have them - so if they told him pfizer was shipping that stuff he would believe it.

Or maybe sometimes they use a severe flu virus here, and the boost the appearance or reputation of it there, with graphene. Dr. Yeadon, Dr. Malone and others have said that Covid (SARS2) is NOT ‘novel’. The claim it was new and our immune system has never seen it before, and that’s why it’s a plague etc., is false.

But spreading it around while deploying graphene at the same time would ‘work’ because a person battling graphene is goign to have a harder time with the flu.

I forget who it was who said that back when some hospitals were showing doctors and nurses working in complete respiration moon suits, it must be that they were pumping spike proteins into the air. The patients in those vignettes were extremely ill and in fatal decline and all these space suited doctors and nurses were rushing around, and we were being supposedly shown that Covid was as terrifying as ebola.

Well, the spike-in-the-air would explain the moon suits and the extreme decline of all patients in those particular wards, but what if it was graphene-in-the-air?

A horrible thought - ventilators. Were some of those dispensing graphene? If the seal around the mouth is complete, that would reduce the risk to unwitting nursing staff (less ‘turnover’).

From the start, I had seen info, videos, microscopic evaluation of nasal swabs that seemed to demonstrate there was hydrogel on the swabs. Then elder care facilities reported little to no Covid-19 until the residents were tested (swabs).

Those perpetrating this have limitations and considerations to manage (how well do they need to control the bioagent) so having both graphene and a sever flue virus that has been weaponized to match graphene poisoning would give them great versatility. They were have somethign of a ‘feedback loop’ which they could use to modulate the effects where and when they needed it.

Forcing people with the flu, falsely diagnosed with Covid into an elder care homes, where the residents were not initially wearing masks (no graphene exposure) would them an excuse to test, and for those seniors the combo of the flu and graphene would likely be ‘too much.’

Sorry, I drifted off your question thinking of the possibilities.

I recall a report of a shipment of Pfizer seized and analyzed, and 38% of the shipment was deemed active. I have no idea who is telling the truth here - active how? At the time I thought that it had dropped below refrigeration levels and had become inactive. Maybe there are severe flu or even some real, ‘novel’ weaponized flu doses out there called ‘vaccines’ which really do have to be kept at extremely cold temperatures, and there are all these graphene doses too.

Production of virus not keeping up? More graphene! As I said, they have considerations and having more than one vector would give them options.