Posted on 07/28/2021 4:12:44 PM PDT by norsky
Rumble — EXCLUSIVE! Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, came forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!
The inoculation being referred to as 'COVID Vaccines' is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.
Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient.
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'
Besides this study was in San Diego
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2
Jiao Zhang Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Y.L., Jiao Zhang, Z.-Y.Y.). Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences (Y.L., Jiao Zhang, L.C., Q.Y., S.W.). Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center. Cardiology, Department of Medicine (Jiao Zhang, M. He, H.S., Y.Z., Y.C., J.Y.-J.S.), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
LOOK AT THE LAST SENTENCE:
“This conclusion suggests that vaccination-generated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S[pike] protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S[pike] protein-imposed endothelial injury.”
IOW, not only does the mRNA vaccine not cause cytotoxicity on its own (because it does not make the entire spike protein), but the generated antibodies protect against cytotoxicity of the viral spike protein.
So, I guess we will just have to wait and see if one or the other was correct, or if we were both correct, while simultaneously being incorrect with respect to various aspects of the topic.
It's also abundantly clear that neither of us are going to budge from our currently beliefs.
Thus it also becomes a totally useless exercise in futility to continue on with further dialog.
But I sincerely wish the best for you. 🙂
My only real issue is this push to ostracize people who choose not to participate in an experimental vaccine study, and may continue to refuse a vaccine that appears to have legitimate safety concerns associated with it when it becomes FDA approved.
The real bottom line here is we are both merely expressing our opinions, because facts are not really forthcoming from sources that either of us can agree on that they are providing the truth, and nothing but the truth.
While I never doubted what our government told us in the past, I personally no longer can do so. They have been caught lying to us on so many issues. One such issue is the claim that Jan. 6th was an insurrection, and that patriots are the enemy of the state. That lie is not the sole domain of just Democrats either. With you, that appears to not be the case, as many of your arguments relied upon what the government is saying. Which of course is your right to believe what they tell you, but it obviously causes me to wonder if you are really paying attention to what is going on here in this country.
Again, I respectfully wish you nothing but the best. Stay safe, if one can in this country anymore. 🙂
Mark to read
The best initial approach to any information these days is skepticism.
Doubt or outright disbelief is warranted when the information comes from the establishment.
Given the frequency and the intensity of false information being spread about coronavirus related questions, your statements here carry little weight.
In our society in general, barriers to giving false information are essentially nonexistent in the absence of a transcendent moral code.
In other words, the establishment has no intrinsic ethic preventing it from spreading lies.
These aren’t “my statements” — look up actual laboratory tests.
And think it through logically - an American pharma company comes up with a vaccine. If this was remotely poisonous, then the Chinese or Russians etc. would make hay of this - or the American company’s rivals would use it to make money.
OR American lawyers would have a field day trying to get millions.
None of that has happened.
Net-net, the ‘poison’ story is false.
Ditto for the graphene oxide - it does not contain graphene oxide.
“think it through logically - an American pharma company comes up with a vaccine. If this was remotely poisonous, then the Chinese or Russians etc. would make hay of this - or the American company’s rivals would use it to make money.”
Your logic is not applicable if the pharmaceutical companies are colluding with foreign agents.
“it does not contain graphene oxide.”
But if it does contain graphene oxide, then your statement is false.
There are multiple scenarios in which the “vaccines” do contain graphene oxide—scenarios which are not ruled out by your logic.
“it does not contain graphene oxide.”
But if it does contain graphene oxide, then your statement is false.
There are multiple scenarios in which the “vaccines” do contain graphene oxide—scenarios which are not ruled out by your logic.
It doesn’t contain graphene oxide.
I repeat, laboratories across the world, even in countries like Russia and China that would love to show up the USA, none saw any traces of graphene oxide.
The Pfizer vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide
China and Russia have their own vaccines. Far less effective than Pfizer.
They are competitors and would live to show any faults in an American vaccine.
But they found none.
The Pfizer vaccine does not contain graphene oxide
Perhaps you may want to fact check this:
A Manufactured Illusion: Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich
Dr. David Martin goes into the patents around coronaviruses.
In case you are wondering who Dr. David Martin is:
His first invention was a laser integrated system to target and treat inoperable tumors. His mathematics helped unravel the way the human body processes hormones and led to the detection and treatment of many diseases. His observation of human behavior led to his development of technology which deciphers the intention and motivation of communication – a technology that has impacted and saved the lives of billions. His global business activities served to develop the world’s top-performing global equity index (including the CNBC IQ100 powered by M·CAM). He’s brought the world’s largest white-collar criminals to justice and brought the world’s most oppressed and disenfranchised transformative ways to engage. From the starry expanses of Mongolia to the flashing lights of New York, his work is as passion-filled whether it’s with a camel herder or a global CEO.
He tells his own story in the critically acclaimed documentary Future Dreaming and breaks down economic injustice in Patent Wars. An author, public speaker, business visionary, professor, researcher, oracle, father, and friend, David is a man Fully Living.
All that was in the first 50 years, now that he is warmed up even greater things are coming! Equipped with his ‘Integral Accounting insights’ and his ‘Breathing Enterprise implementation’, what’s happening today is more interesting than everything before. And the best thing of all is that, if you’d like to experience what it’s like to be fully living, you can be part of the action! Together with Kim Martin – the woman that taught him some of his most important lessons about fully living – and a core team of masterful colleagues, you too can step into the full essence of what it means to Fully Live!
Dr. David E. Martin is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., the international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. He is the developer of the first innovation-based quantitative index of public equities and is the Managing Partner of the Purple Bridge Funds. He is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index – the CNBC IQ100 powered by M·CAM. Actively engaged in global ethical economic development, Dr. Martin’s work includes financial engineering and investment, public speaking, writing and providing financial advisory services to the majority of countries in the world. Dr. Martin is the architect and founder of the Global Innovation Commons and is the author of the international legal framework for the Heritable Knowledge Trust and Heritable Innovation Trust programs. He has pioneered global programs to bring corporate and stock market transparency to multi-national extractive industries and has been instrumental in repatriating value to countries which have been subject to corporate and financial abuses. His work on ethical engagement and stewardship of community and commons-based value interests is at the forefront of global financial innovation. Dr. Martin is a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. He served as Chair of Economic Innovation for the UN-affiliated Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization and has served as an advisor to numerous Central Banks, global economic forums, the World Bank and International Finance Corporation, and national governments.
A spokesperson for global financial and intangible asset accountability and quality reform, Dr. Martin has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, and Asia in advocating and deploying infrastructure to support growing reliance on contract and proprietary rights in business transactions. Under the leadership of Dr. Martin, M·CAM has supported the modernization of banking, intangible asset, tax, and accounting laws through its work with oversight agencies and policy makers.
Dr. Martin has founded several for-profit and not-for-profit companies and organizations and serves on several boards. He was a Co-Chair of the ADC (Australia Davos Connection) Forum’s Leadership Retreat and Critical Infrastructure and Cybersecurity Councils. He was the founding Director of Melbourne’s Centre of Applied Innovation. He served as Chairman and CEO of eSurface®. He was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies, Inc., a company that developed and commercialized technologies in advanced computational linguistics, dynamic data compression and encryption, electrical field transmission, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic. He was a founding member of Japan’s Institute for Interface Science and Technology (IIST). He founded and served as Executive Director of the Charlottesville Venture Group. He has served as a board member for the Research Institute for Small and Emerging Business (Washington, D.C.), the Academy for Augmenting Grassroots Technological Innovations (India), the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce (Virginia), and the Charlottesville Industrial Development Agency (Virginia), Humanitad (U.K), Global Urban Development, and many other agencies dedicated to ethical human development. As international policy contributor, economist and futurist, Dr. Martin’s work at The Arlington Institute (U.S.) included accurately forecasting the global financial crisis of 2008 and working with the launch of Singapore’s Risk Assessment Horizon Scanning initiative.
Dr. Martin’s work as a Fellow of the Batten Institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia and his related work at the Indian Institute for Management Ahmedabad, India, has brought unprecedented curricular focus to areas of intangible-asset risk management, finance, and accounting standards. In addition to his academic work, Dr. Martin has closely advised innovation-based finance and investment programs in India, Bermuda, Brazil, China, Denmark, the European Union, the United Kingdom, South Africa, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States, Mongolia, Egypt, Ecuador, Singapore, Germany, Slovenia, Vietnam, and the United Arab Emirates. He has served as the Constitutional and Economic advisor to the Autonomy Committee of East New Britain and New Ireland, Papua New Guinea and has worked with ethical trade frameworks for the Kingdom of Tonga, the Independent State of Samoa, Fiji, and Papua New Guinea.
His work has been the subject of two internationally awarded documentaries, Patent Wars which highlights his work on reform of the global innovation system and Future Dreaming: A Conversation with David Martin which is a dialogue about humanity and its optimal interaction in the universe. He has spoken at the United Nations General Assembly on citizen-led peacemaking initiatives and has been featured on Bloomberg television and HBO’s Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.
A speaker, author, business executive and futurist, Dr. Martin’s work has been engaged in every country on Earth. He works with his family in every endeavor of life. Together with his wife Kim, he directs the Breathing Enterprise workshops and facilitates implementation of Integral Accounting. Dr. Martin received his undergraduate (BA) from Goshen College, his Masters of Science from Ball State University, and his Doctorate (PhD) from the University of Virginia.
The David Martin video has been out since July 2020, ie since last year.
It’s also been debunked.
A Manufactured Illusion: Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich
They have certain “secret ingredients” they hide. They don’t say what they are because of “patent reasons”.
These shots are creating dead men walking.
***********
Not disagreeing with your statements above. But do you have
legit sources for them? Or are they someone’s opinion, just
a guess or just a maybe?
“China and Russia have their own vaccines. Far less effective than Pfizer.
They are competitors and would live to show any faults in an American vaccine.
But they found none.”
Your claims are based on assumptions with high potential error.
You cannot be certain the vaccine doesn’t contain graphene oxide.
There are claims that the substance was omitted from patent documentation because it’s a known toxin.
Given the history of pharmaceutical crimes proven in court, it’s a lot safer to assume the vaccines have toxins.
You’re making an awful lot of unprovable negative claims about things you have zero direct observation of.
Note, you made the claim that there is graphene oxide. There isn’t.
This is provable and has been proved by labs across the world, even in rival nations.
Rival companies would love to show up Pfizer if they erred. Yet silence.
Net net, the Pfizer vaccines do not contain graphene oxide.
I can be certain for the simple reason that the vaccine is out there and labs across the world can test it and have tested it and found no graphene oxide.
Where did I claim there was graphene oxide in the shots?
If it’s not in there, it’s not in there.
But if it is, then it is.
Let’s get this straight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.