These aren’t “my statements” — look up actual laboratory tests.
And think it through logically - an American pharma company comes up with a vaccine. If this was remotely poisonous, then the Chinese or Russians etc. would make hay of this - or the American company’s rivals would use it to make money.
OR American lawyers would have a field day trying to get millions.
None of that has happened.
Net-net, the ‘poison’ story is false.
Ditto for the graphene oxide - it does not contain graphene oxide.
“think it through logically - an American pharma company comes up with a vaccine. If this was remotely poisonous, then the Chinese or Russians etc. would make hay of this - or the American company’s rivals would use it to make money.”
Your logic is not applicable if the pharmaceutical companies are colluding with foreign agents.
“it does not contain graphene oxide.”
But if it does contain graphene oxide, then your statement is false.
There are multiple scenarios in which the “vaccines” do contain graphene oxide—scenarios which are not ruled out by your logic.
“it does not contain graphene oxide.”
But if it does contain graphene oxide, then your statement is false.
There are multiple scenarios in which the “vaccines” do contain graphene oxide—scenarios which are not ruled out by your logic.