Posted on 05/08/2021 9:17:52 PM PDT by Cathi
Exceptional "deep in the weeds" ongoing scientific discussion between scientists, doctors and other medical professionals about the mRNA vaccine.
Absolutely the most detailed and forthright conversation on these vaccines I have read so far.
Bookmark.
Thank you for posting this.
To recap, the questions are:
Appalled is putting it mildly. My suspicions are confirmed exactly by this clip “ much greater risk of systemic and critical tissue and organ damage than other vaccines, especially if multiple booster shots are needed, with side effects that may not manifest for years (with cumulative damage and chronic inflammation)”. Imagine the outrage, anger, and rebellion by those that took the experimental jabs from our corrupted government and Pharma that tricked many into believing they were safe....
bkmrk
Thanks for posting a really good article.
Does the vaccine cross the blood brain barrier and alter spinal fluid?
To recap, the questions are:
Mild blood thinners to lower the risk of blood clots?
Olive oil to lower the risk of blood clots?
Tumeric to reduce vascular system damage from the spike protein?
Olive oil to reduce vascular system damage from the spike protein?
Ivermectin + zinc to reduce vascular system damage from the spike protein? and if so, mechanism?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t have specific answers but wanted to comment on the thinners.
The clots are basically sticky strands of blood cells that should otherwise not stick together.
Many, many reports in VAERS are for people who have stroke-like symptoms or damage but no visible clot when studied. Reads like the blood thickened but did not form a hard clot and cleared either by intervention or on it’s own, sometimes resolving symptoms and sometimes causing lasting damage requiring physical therapy, transfer to ‘stroke ward.’
So your idea of thinners has some merit, however, there’s a reported problem with Thrombocytopenia.
Some people having symptoms following vaccination are tested and have 0 platelets for clotting! Previously thought to be impossible and when first encoutnered post vaccine believed to be a lab error. But upon re-testing, accurate lab result.
Typically, TCP assumes some platelets for clotting were destroyed, pr bone marrow not making the platlets etc. But post vax, this happens too swiftly to be plately production halt. So likely either platelets destroyed or more often - severe clotting in some regions of the body ‘occupy’ all clotting platelets.
I’ve read about patients who have both clots and an inability to stop bleeding. So you have a clot and let’s say they want to operate - all the clotting platets are ‘apparently’ in the clot location (pulmonary, brain, extremeties) and there are none left over for clotting at the incision site.
There are many strokes from ‘cerebrovascular accidents’ but there are also brain bleeds.
So with thinners you could bleed out if you have issues with failure of clotting platelets. :(
This article was publushed four months ago. The bulk of the comments are three months old. Is there a follow-up article to this one that takes into account the vastly expanded VAERS database information accumulated since January and any other specific technical/scientific/engineering information about the actual mRNA serums and how they function in situ?
Can you give us a one paragraph summary?
I always feel guilty scrolling past big blocks of text like that, without reading past the first two lines.
I just know there’s interesting and enlightening material in that cinder block but I just can’t bring myself to sift through it. Life is too short.
I’ll wait for the Reader’s Digest version.
I hardly doubt you’re the only one. I skipped it too. Could use more paragraphs but it also has to do with the fact that FR has no margins and uses whatever the default text of your browser is. Makes for a really wide, ugly book.
“Can you give us a one paragraph summary?”
About 10 different scientists, doctors, etc. discussing issues with the mRNA vaccine “that’s been raising great concern for me and lately, most of medical and biomedical colleagues: What exactly is the tissue tropism (distribution) and cellular localization of these nanoparticles, and could this pose a side effect threat through errant MHC-I-mediated autoimmunity? Are they crossing the blood-brain barrier? Entering the parenchyma of vital organs (that even SARS-CoV-2 can’t access) and expressing the coronavirus spike protein on MHC-1 molecules, making these critical tissues targets of cytotoxic attack?”
In effect: Are these vaccines dangerous.
With all the different processes, at a cellular level, it seems hard to believe these jabs are going to go as planned in all cases in this huge variable pool of humans and their biological variability.
The article appears quite good....haven’t finished yet, though.
BTT
The Salk institute just came out with a damning paper on the vaccines. They said it could be the worst crime against humanity evah!
You’ve got to love the CDC..:-) There is no end to their attempts to keep the public in the dark. They have delayed publishing “adverse events reports” by months...making it appear that far less reports had been received.
Now, they want to obfuscate the breakthrough case reporting.
“As previously announced, CDC is transitioning to reporting only patients with COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infection that were hospitalized or died to help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. That change in reporting will begin on May 14, 2021. In preparation for that transition, the number of reported breakthrough cases will not be updated on May 7, 2021.”
Dead cells don’t hang around, they’re dissolved. And since the proteins and enzymes inside can be dangerous toxins if absorbed by other living cells, the body is pretty good at cleaning them up.
Yes.
S says: 11 January, 2021 at 8:38 pm Good information. Yes, a recent paper has been published in Nature Neuroscience entitled “The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice” to uncover its ability to cross Blood Brain Barrier. Which tissues will mRNA vaccine target exactly? A little alarming situation, this. Would be better if more information by vaccine companies are provided rather than getting anxious on trade secrets.
It has in fact been found that mRNA from the injections doesn't stay in the injection site, but gets carried all over the body, and crosses the blood-brain barrier.
Pfizer and Moderna were real quiet about the existence or tests of any results, of tests, about the distribution of mRNA following injection.
If any brain cells express the spike protein, the immune system puts a hit out on them.
But that does not address --
the cells with the spike protein, being destroyed by the immune system
the cells presenting the spike protein, merging with neighboring cells
in either/both of the above cases, either the direct effects of said cells suddenly missing from the brain, or, any downstream effects or markers caused by, or left by, the immune system, which could lead t progressive damage over time.
The potential would increase with each successive booster shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.