Posted on 05/08/2021 8:32:30 AM PDT by NachOsten
An explosive new study by researchers at the prestigious Salk Institute casts doubt on the current crop of gene-based vaccines that may pose a grave risk to public health. The article, which is titled “The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays an additional key role in illness”, shows that SARS-CoV-2’s “distinctive ‘spike’ protein”….”damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease.” While the paper focuses strictly on Covid-related issues, it unavoidably raises questions about the new vaccines that contain billions of spike proteins that could greatly increase the chances of severe illness or death.
Now there is solid evidence that:
Covid-19 is primarily a disease of the vascular system (The vascular system, also called the circulatory system, is made up of the vessels that carry blood and lymph through the body.) and not the respiratory system. The main culprit is the spike protein. (Spike protein–“a glycoprotein that protrudes from the envelope of some viruses” Merriam-Webster “Like a key in a lock, these spike proteins fuse to receptors on the surface of cells, allowing the virus’s genetic code to invade the host cell, take over its machinery and replicate.” Bruce Lieberman) If Covid-19 is primarily a vascular disease and if the main instrument of physical damage is the spike protein, then why are we injecting people with billions of spike proteins?
Do you think it’s a good idea to bypass the first (defenses) of your immune system, and inject… trillions of spike proteins in your cells given the information that has just been released by the Salk Institute? Think about it….
(read full article here)
New Report Sheds Light on Vaccine Doomsday Cult
There are no isolated samples of the SARS-2 virus. Specific researchers with connections release research about the virus as if studying it, but the average joe cannot get a sample. This has been an ongoing mystery and some researchers have 'called the bluff' and stated there IS no virus (i.e., put up or shut up. Give me a sample or stop claiming it exists).
I know there is a CoronaVirus SARS-2, but the CDC, NIH etc. are lying about who has it, what it does, because they intentionally use a PCR test to diagnose it, and that test gives false results. Using the PCR means they can't know who had or didn't have Covid-19 in their 'vaccine' trials, and they never knew who had it throughout the lockdowns.
But China has bought off many researchers, labs etc. who will falsely say they've used the isolated samples. FReeper Magic Bullet did some research of his own. (I think it's the second link) by calling and searching FOAI etc.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3945205/posts?page=93#93
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3945205/posts?page=95#95
Not having isolated samples keeps good-guy researchers from exposing the plandemic.
Good guy researchers, can't examine the virus directly because they can't get samples.
So it looks like the good guys are saying, "Okay, so you already told us the vaccines were manufactured based only on the Covid-19 genome China released to the world in Jan 2020. You say the 'vaccine' causes the body to produce THE SAME spike protein as the virus (of which we can't get a sample).
Well then, your research shows the spike protein produced by the vaccine is, in isolation, harmful."
So they prove their point although denied isolated samples.
Of course the tactic on the Deep State driving this plandemic shifts to - "Oh well, it's not EXACTLY the same spike protein...."
This will push the issue to PROVE it's not exactly the same. There's still maneuvering that the DS will use to evade exposure, but physicians and researchers can point to physical evidence that the public is experiencing adverse events following vaccination that match the expectations of the harmful effects of the spike protein.
The DS will likely counter, "Well those people had covid..." and the white hats answer, "What? So many? Starting after vaccination?" etc. etc.
The ball is in play. Prayers up. May God SWIFTLY halt the administration of the fake vaccines and let effective treatmetns already available flow to the public.
antibody dependent enhancement
You need to understand what that means and why it means you MIGHT have your life shortened because you submitted to a corrupt gubermint that conned huge numbers of people to take an experimental treatment that is totally unnecessary.
I personally wish you luck along with the other people I know who decided to take the unnecessary, DANGEROUS risks of a scam medical emergency that was hyped by corrupt DimWIT politicians and criminals like Fraud Fauci and high school graduate Bill Gates who is a #1 con artist.
No. my wife did after shopping all day with girlfriend who got the shots...started feeling bad, then tested positive the day after shopping. It’ll have been 3 weeks tomorrow. It’s been tough times at my house. Me...i’m still OK.
“SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins” are spike proteins from the disease—not the vaccine.
YOU deliberately suppressed the first half of the article which showed that pseudoviruses with spike proteins and no reproductive genetic material, caused all KINDS of problems.
In REAL LIVE EXPERIMENTS.
The second half of the article is mere assertions and speculation : The Moderna mRNA vaccine produces only a portion of the spike protein, not a complete protein, and this portion is considered harmless.
And then presents this obvious propaganda as "FACT". Is this more of the lies and bullcrap foisted by the MD at Baylor who wrote in Nature that "anti-vaxxers are linked to right-wing extremists who spread disinformation about the 2020 election" ?
Oh -- there's experimental evidence in published work from EXPERIMENTS on mice (not from from what might as well be thinly disguised press-releases from the Marketing Dept. for Moderna) that materials from the mRNA injection are found in numerous tissues throughout the body within 24 hours of injection.
The mRNA injections prompt the body to produce spike protein and express it on the surface of cells; the spike protein directly causes problems even without the virus present, based on published experimental work.
said that the reason the spike proteins were chosen instead of other proteins,
were that the other proteins had been implicated in "Antibody Depenent Enhancement"
(in which, a second infection later on, can kill you because the immune system goes into overdrive).
It was guessed, back when the coof was still only in Wuhan, that this is why people were "dropping dead in the street" ;
the phenomenon called ADE is not theoretical, but has been seen with other viruses such as Dengue fever.
“COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein.”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Nicely done. I call those words weasley. From a legal perspective they are meaningless and they are used intentionally because of that.
When I got the Covid test I asked straight out, how many cycles are they using to get a positive result. The two nurses who took my sample looked at me like I had 3 heads. When I got the results by phone call, I asked the PCR cycle number, which should be on the test result. They said that they have no idea. All they get back is a paper that says positive or negative.
Best healthcare system in the world was knocked down several notches in the last couple of years is my guess.
I shared the article with Mrs. AZLiberty, who read way down into the comments and found what's below, about the polio vaccines. If this is true, vaccine disinformation has a LONG history.
The following is from Janine Roberts’ 2004 article about polio which appeared in The Ecologist. It might still be available on the web if it hasn’t been memory-holed:
“…However, despite these new regulations, four months later more than 2,000 cases of infantile paralysis were recorded in Boston, despite the vaccination of 130,000 children in the city. The previous year it had seen only 273 cases. The number of cases doubled in vaccinated New York State and Connecticut, and tripled in Vermont. They increased by five times in both Rhode Island and Wisconsin. Many were paralysed in the injected arm.
It seemed that the vaccine would soon be totally discredited. So, to protect the President, Salk, the vaccine manufacturers and themselves from the humiliation of an unmitigated failure, the US health authorities had to dramatically slash the incidence of poliomyelitis. They managed this by simply changing the way they recorded the incidents of poliomyelitis. It worked like this:
Prior to 1956, the authorities recorded a patient as having paralytic polio (infantile paralysis) if they suffered from paralytic symptoms for 24 hours. After 1956 patients had to have these paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days to be counted as having polio. As many people recovered within 60 days, this measure alone dramatically cut the official number of cases. This `drop’ in polio cases was publicly credited to the vaccine. Furthermore, all cases of polio occurring within 30 days of vaccination (such as the first 200 cases that had so alarmed the White House) were in future not to be blamed on the vaccine but to be recorded as `pre-existing’.
But Salk continued to worry. Despite its regulatory and statistical `success’, the reputation of his vaccine was plummeting. In June 1955 the British doctors’ union the Medical Practitioners’ Union wrote: `These misfortunes would be almost endurable if a whole new generation were to be rendered permanently immune to the disease. In fact, there is no evidence that any lasting immunity is achieved.’ (21)
The following month Canada suspended its distribution of Salk’s vaccine. By November all European countries had suspended distribution plans, apart from Denmark. By January 1957 17 US states had stopped distributing the vaccine. The same year The New York Times reported that nearly 50 per cent of cases of infantile paralysis in children between the ages of five and 14 had occurred after vaccination.
So, more regulatory and statistical changes were needed in order to give the polio vaccine the appearance of a triumph of modern medicine. What better way to achieve this than to reclassify all the cases of polio into numerous other diseases resulting in a massive reduction in polio cases, and a host of other diseases to attract funding. And this is exactly what they did.
Prior to 1958 the definition of infantile paralysis (polio) included cases in which paralysis was minimal: perhaps manifesting itself as a very stiff neck, often accompanied by widespread pain. Polio also included cases of `meningitis’, or of inflammation of the membrane that protects the brain and spinal neurons. The CDC describes such cases as `serious but rarely fatal’.(22) Prior to 1958 these cases were scientifically referred to as `non-paralytic poliomyelitis’, or polio for short. Henceforward, they would be reclassified.
The Los Angeles County health authorities stated: `Most cases reported prior to July 1 1958 of non-paralytic poliomyelitis are now reported as viral or aseptic meningitis.’ The incidence of meningitis soared as official polio cases declined, as the following table (compiled from national surveillance reports)shows.
Non-paralytic polio cases.
1951-1960 70,083
1961-1982 589
1983-1992 0
Aseptic meningitis cases.
1951-1960 0
1961-1982 102,999
1983-1992 117,366
Jim West, Images of Poliomyelitis
These classifications are still used today. Last year the US National Center for Infectious Diseases reported no cases of poliomyelitis but 30,000 to 50,000 cases of aseptic meningitis requiring hospitalisation. There are probably several times this number of incidents of aseptic meningitis that did not require hospitalisation, but statistics are no longer kept for such cases.
Then another scam was enacted to massage down the poliomyelitis figures. It took advantage of the 1951 discovery that different viruses could be present in cases of infantile paralysis. Prior to 1958 this did not matter. A doctor diagnosed a person with polio by taking note of their evident symptoms. They did not investigate to see if the poliovirus were present. In 1958 a new regulation was put in place requiring doctors to only register a patient as having polio if the poliovirus were present, something that was very difficult to establish for sure. For a start, it was impossible to tell by looking at symptoms. The Textbook of Child Neurology reported: `Coxsackie virus and echoviruses can cause paralytic syndromes that are clinically indistinguishable from paralytic poliomyelitis.’ This new requirement for doctors caused a vast drop in the number of cases registered as poliomyelitis – a drop that ever since has been credited solely to the vaccine.
So, when patients diagnosed as having polio in a 1958 epidemic in Detroit were re-tested as required by this new rule, 49 per cent were found to have no poliovirus. They had to be reclassified as having `non-poliomyelitis acute flaccid paralysis’ even though they were suffering from symptoms identical to poliomyelitis with the same paralysis and the same pain. Other polio cases were reclassified as `Guillian-Barré syndrome’, which some researchers now think is what crippled Roosevelt. Yet more cases are now referred to as `Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease’, which can also cause paralysis. And last year the Coxsackie virus was found in cases of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), which sometimes shows polio-like symptoms of muscle damage; in the past CFS might have been classified as a form of polio.
If this process of reclassification had not occurred, it would have been impossible to hide the fact that infantile paralysis cases had sharply increased after the introduction of Salk’s vaccine. Without the Coxsackie and aseptic meningitis reclassifications, for example, the number of reported cases of paralytic polio would have doubled from 2,500 in 1957 to 5,000 in 1959. (23)
This deliberate fraud did not go entirely unnoticed, however. Dr Bernard Greenberg, the then head of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of North Carolina, testified at a 1962 Congressional hearing that infantile paralysis cases had increased after the introduction of the vaccine by 50 per cent from 1957 to 1958, and by 80 per cent from 1958 to 1959. He concluded that US health officials had manipulated the statistics to give entirely the opposite impression. (24)”
I don’t know the answer to that question but I’m not standing next to my in laws for awhile or maybe death ease down my throat. 🤔
“I’m fine at 6 months”.
Sounds like you’re sweatin it out. I’m sure that little lump on your neck isn’t a third ear developing. 😆
If you always distrust the govt and gassy doctors with bad advice you have discerned the truth. 😉
I’m sweating nothing but idiots like you providing false information. I’m grateful for the vaccination particularly when I spend all day taking care of people with covid who are too frightened to get the vaccination because of what they read in the internet at least I’m. it bringing it home to my family
” who are to frightened to get the vaccination because of what they read on the internet “.
Or maybe they read the report from the Salk Institute which says that this vaccine will likely go down as the biggest crime against humanity in history. 🤔
Thank you for your post.
I took J&J one month ago and I’m fine. But I keep hearing horror stories ... some from conservatives I usually trust.
These are strange times; and I pray every nite for God to help me know the Truth and truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.