Posted on 04/28/2021 7:42:21 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
The Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association (MEMA) has informed a Senate Commerce subcommittee on transportation that the Biden Administration’s penchant for electric vehicles is starting to get under its skin. The union is recommending that the United States avoid setting any timeline for the proposed banning of internal combustion vehicles because it might cost a staggering number of jobs.
Ann Wilson, MEMA’s senior vice president of government affairs, said vehicle restrictions were unrealistic before 2040 and would obliterate entire segments of the auto industry without providing concrete assurances that the environment would be improved. While the latter claim can be argued endlessly, the former is pretty difficult to refute.
This is something anyone paying attention to the automotive sector could have seen coming from miles away. As manufacturers began praising EVs for their simplicity and noting how they used far fewer moving parts than their gasoline or diesel equivalents, suppliers should have been asking themselves if the fuel injectors they produce will have a place in an electrically driven society.
But the answer is obviously no. Electric cars generally require fewer components and less labor to manufacture and will undoubtedly result in major changes for the workforce. MEMA estimated losing 30 percent of the supplier industry’s traditional workforce if the United States transitioned over to EVs. That’s hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of good-paying jobs. In 2020, a study by the National Platform for the Future of Mobility (NPM) informed the German government that 410,000 jobs connected with the automotive industry could be lost by the end of this decade under the nation’s current trajectory. American losses would be substantially worse.
MEMA is recommending a mixed approach where manufacturers can continue making ICE’s more efficient while developing hybrid and battery-electric models to a point where they will naturally overtake fuel-burning automobiles as the dominant mode of transportation. It’s still targeting a zero-emissions future, just one that doesn’t require placing massive restrictions on the industry.
Automakers, who stand to benefit from having to pay fewer assembly workers and equipment manufacturers, are more willing to embrace electrification and many have already set targets for ditching products requiring fuel tanks. But it’s not clear how much of that is for show. While digitizing cars plays into the industry’s obsession with monetizing driver data, electrification doesn’t seem profitable in the short term without government help and it seems to shift an incredible amount of the auto sector’s power over to battery companies and energy concerns. We’ve been under the impression that some of the largest manufacturers put on a pro-EV face and frequently support government initiatives just to avoid ruffling feathers and getting slapped with regulations.
While completely ridiculous, appeasement is a fairly common practice with plenty of recent examples. Pipefitting unions backed Joe Biden for president, despite his vow to stop production on the Keystone XL pipeline and put members out of work. So did the United Mine Workers of America, with its leadership embracing a federal energy plan that prohibits coal mining last week. Union boss Cecil Roberts even admitted that it would probably cost the industry jobs but that it was important to be part of the “conversation” and ensure the environmental wellbeing of the planet.
Meanwhile, China is on pace to build several hundred new coalfired energy facilities over the next ten years and shares our air.
UAW leadership, which traditionally endorses Democrat candidates, also backed the Biden administration. But members have been hypercritical of the push toward electrification for years and it’s been a common talking point whenever they go on strike. We’ve only seen this swell with worker’s unions around the world gradually starting to rally around the issue — though it always seems to be the highest-ranking members that are the last to join the cause.
States have also been taking sides, with roughly a dozen governors promising to adopt the Californian proposal to end the sale of new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035. However they are not just attempting to prohibit sales within their own borders, they would ideally like to see the federal laws put into place that would create national restrictions.
“The U.S. is in danger of losing our competitive edge due to a lack of clear national policies” said Wilson. “For the U.S to be a leader in automotive innovation and transportation, we must work collaboratively to develop a comprehensive national vision and strategy.”
MEMA’s testimony is available here.
I’ve seen more gas outages than blackouts in the last 20 years.
Yes, latest EVs are being built to million-mile specs … battery included.
I can install sufficient solar harvesting at home for most car use.
I can’t make my own gasoline, period.
Let the market decide. If EVs get to that point, ICE cars will rapidly go extinct.
But you know damn well the market won’t decide. It will be shoved down our throats.
Just about any car can do 1 million miles easy. Not so sure they have batteries that can last that long though.
“Yes, latest EVs are being built to million-mile specs … battery included.”
Any of them actually done that yet?
2/3rds fewer parts in electric vehicles vs. gas powered autos. So I’m told.
So where exactly is all of this electricity going to come from? How are the parts and vehicles going to be made? According to the asinine plan, wind and solar but that is absolutely ludicrous.
If the rank & file of those unions pull their collective heads out, the market can and will decide.
Interesting point
I know many many Freepers have many doubts about EV’s. I suggest that most of the folks on this board would like EV’s if they give it a try. Not for everyone, but for more than you think. They drive great and the technology is amazing.
I have every confidence EV’s will outsell combustion in a handful of years. 2027 or so.
I just don’t think the infrastructure will be able to handle everyone driving an EV. But then again one of the Liberals’ goals is to destroy personal transportation.
They’ll have to compete with millions more of illegals aliens Biden and the Democrats are bringing in.
I was just thinking that, what happens in a hurricane when the power is out? What about seniors who only drive every week or so? How long does it hold a charge sitting in the driveway? Where do you store the can of spare electricity if you run out of charge in the middle of the desert?
In big energy states like Texas, their energy choked when it was really needed. The grid in CA is a joke etc. So where are they going to get the power to charge tens of millions of vehicles daily?
BTW, since I once worked in Marketing, we heard rumors that Tesla Corp had identified a sub-market where they would buy EVs and plug them in to their landlords’ electrical outlets overnight for charging. Basically electric golf carts used for short distance commutes and trips.
So they developed a circuit similar to a Kill-a-Watt that could be bought aftermarket, installed onto the outlet with tamper proofing. In this way the landlords could still allow overnight recharging without getting ripped off and the drivers keep their vehicles.
It still hasn’t been rolled out,presumably because landlords haven’t caught on yet.
Oh, no problem- just look at all of the wind turbines that the feds are financing with taxpayer debt to Chyna.
There was an interesting article here on FR about the massive amount of land area necessary to support “green energy “. The current demand would require the total land mass of California, Oregon and Idaho. That doesn’t count the increased demand for a national mandate for EVs.
You’re right. I stand corrected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.