Posted on 03/05/2021 11:39:06 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
Edited on 03/05/2021 11:41:27 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Excuse me if this is a stupid question, but if QAnon is such an existential threat to our republic, as the media and federal law enforcement agencies would have us believe, why haven't they captured or neutralized this threat? After all, we're not talking about cave-hopping, Tora-Bora dwelling Jihadis. The alleged threat isn't emanating from some faraway land. Supposedly, this group is home grown and the US government, we are also led to believe, is keeping close tabs on them. Yet, with the plethora of mind-bogglingly sophisticated tracking and surveillance technology at their disposal, are we supposed to believe the government is helpless against this seemingly almighty foe? Isn't it obvious by now that this whole thing is a crock of BS? There, I said it.
Your thoughts?
Absolutely spot on.
I have stood on the sidelines and observed the Q phenomenon. I don’t quite understand the prophecy stuff, because none of that came from Q. The person is a christian and post scripture, but I never saw the weird Shaman stuff and cult activities that the news is now claiming:
Q was someone in the intelligence community fighting the deep staters in the intell community. He had and posted pictures of pervs on pedo island that no one else had. NO ONE HAS EXPLAINED THIS. No one has explained how some random person got access to photos that no one else had of Clinton, Prince andrew, Epstein, pictures of the cameras at Epstein’s, pictures of the girls, got released. He posted a list of Republicans and Democrats arrested for child molesting and kiddy porn.
Anons and pizzagate made claims about child molesters and human traffic rings. Some of it included a possible Cabal of elites involved in it (Epstein’s perv island). Anyone in law enforcement will tell you, child molesting and human trafficking are more prevelant now than it has ever been. Read the news about all the pedo rings being busted and all the stolen children in the last few weeks.
There were other detractors on 4chan, posting and pretending to be Anons or Q to make the drops (or leaks) look like a bunch of qooks.
Q told people to look at the evidence and think for themselves. The media portrays the group as a cult, but the whole basis of the group was that people high up in government were perverts and used their power to further and cover up their perv proclivities. And that DJT was going to stop the swamp from it’s sick and evil deeds.
No one has explained the photos, no one has explained the lists of perverts in government arrested, no one has explained all the pedo rings and missing children are increasing, no one has explained that DJT has been commended as the greatest president to fight human trafficking and crimes against children.
The Federal government IS the enemy of the American people!
is to start electoral fraud programs in the largest states to turn them from Red-to-Purple-to Blue
Exactly. And to import hordes of low-skilled workers from south of the "border" to disenfranchise legal voters. Remove California from the popular vote tabulation and Trump wins the popular vote by upwards of 2 million.
BTW, thanks for the helpful links.
You nailed it.
By no means am I even suggesting that Q is a hoax. I’m agnostic on that front.
OK, I misunderstood you. I will add though, you keep saying you’re agnostic on the Q thing. How do you explain DJT not sending out one single tweet saying Q is fake news?
To send out info saying you have another’s approval is recklessly dangerous. Imagine if I had your contact list. I could start by send out harmless stuff saying I have your approval. Everyone, even really dumb people would be able to calculate the kind of danger this would pose. One text saying “Hey moderator daughter, don’t take the school bus home, get in the black sedan with the puppies”. signed Sidebar Mod.
I think it is the biggest of conspiracy theories to believe that Donald J. Trump is not smart enough to put a stop to this movement if he was not involved. Especially since some of the Q posts are from POTUS himself. He would have to be as stupid as Biden to ignore this.
Bears repeating; on this score, the Q proponents have, by far, the better of the argument.
In all honesty, I can not explain that. Is it persuasive circumstantial evidence? Absolutely. There are strong arguments on both sides. Unlike the Q antagonists, I remain open to being convinced either way.
My beef is with the notion of some existential "QAnon threat" being spewed by the administration and its dutiful corporate media mouthpieces.
Lacking any real white supremacist organizations constituting a threat to “our Democracy” or anything else, the DemocRAT Left decided to invent one in the form of Q and the Anons. This group appears to consist of nothing more than a bunch of harmless conspiracy theorists who like to smell each others farts by way of internet posts. Having identified a suitable boogey man the Left has now directed the FBI (now an arm of the DemocRAT party) to investigate and demonize them. Note that the FBI treats Q anon (an imaginary organization) as real, while treating Antifa, a real organization that has caused billions in damage to American cities, as imaginary. It’s all nonsense.
Yep - if they wanted to go after real threats, most of the Fake News would be under intense scrutiny - they are upping the propaganda now and creating the meme that someone “who worked for the Trump Admin” was video at the Capitol Hill fiasco - as proof it’s all trump’s fault.
Q and the anons have done nothing to hurt anyone. They mostly have uncovered things through research. I say leave people alone and lets cool the censorship.
Precisely. The "QAnon threat" narrative engineers are using them as fodder to feed their desired construct.
Again, to be clear, it's entirely possible that Q himself is legit AND that the "QAnon threat" is a hoax concocted by manipulators from deep state with a self-serving interests in falsely painting Q as a villain and tarring all his followers as armed and dangerous "domestic terrorists".
Precisely!
Couldn’t agree with you more.
*interest
Q has nothing to do with Trump. And yes, since you said it, you folks are gullible. But if you still are pushing Q at this point, you’re too far gone to be persuaded. Adios.
In all honesty, I can not explain that. Is it persuasive circumstantial evidence? Absolutely. There are strong arguments on both sides. Unlike the Q antagonists, I remain open to being convinced either way.
It’s nice to converse with people who are open minded. If you don’t mind, can you tell me what good argument the other side has? Mostly I just hear a lot of complaining from them. As you called them the Q antagonists think Q is dropping names and dates. Uh, no. All names and dates are speculation by us.
It sure is acting like it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.