|
Posted on 02/20/2021 1:56:44 PM PST by ransomnote
(h/t COUNTrecount)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Sure it was! --NOT!
Clapper and Brennan always intended to complete Rockefeller/Rothschild/Bush's efforts to turn the US to their version of the Third Way, a marriage between totalitarianism and capitalistic principles.
The Third Way for the Chinese Communists to move toward capitalism and for the US, it was to move toward communism. Mary Fanning puts out her timeline in that article to pretend her expose' was causation when it was only a coincidental sequence. It should be obvious to any thoughtful person that Comey wouldn't have done anything so momentous that wasn't planned far, far longer than 24-hours in advance.
Lyons' ears and eyes knew that Montgomery's Hammer was first used as election fraud to create out of whole cloth Barry the Usurper's natural born citizen credentials, when it became clear Brennan's Analysis Corp's work at the State Department with passport records was deemed vulnerable and incomplete.
Yes.
Hi, rn... for some reason I am not able to ‘Post a reply’ in the new thread. Could you ping me there and see if that makes a difference. Thanks. IR
Hi, rn... for some reason I am not able to ‘Post a reply’ in the new thread. Could you ping me there and see if that makes a difference. Thanks. IR
~~~~~~~~
Hi, Bob. Sevlex pm’d me the same thing - said he couldn’t post to the new thread. Let’s see if pinging you helps.
We The People during his career, naysayers will be embarrassed that they ever berated him, on a level as they might be if they’ve berated LTG Michael Flynn.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Regardless of the outcome or how many parties attended, I shall not be embarrassed that I don’t believe Juan O Savin is a valid source of intel because I am basing my opinion on logic, reasoning, and Q’s post “No outside comms”.
Now that sounds like an interesting evening
I shook hands with one of the Bundy's, a two-star general, the purportedly top decorated Vietnam Green Beret, and multiple spec ops guys. Video and picture-taking was banned for good reason.
These high-moral-conviction people all knew what to do with a short-notice invitation from Juan. I perceived these people were straight arrows and they came to honor Juan's invitation with their time and some shekels. I saw not one scintilla of misbehavior or amorality. Hotel security, however, probably would say that many attendees had to be repeatedly warned to keep their masks on in public areas lest the "scofflaws" be removed.
These consistent data points uniquely go toward affirming not that Juan has an infallible crystal ball, but that he is at least not someone with feet of clay who regularly leads his friends and important folk astray.
Jim Caviezel said the event had its genesis in a 4-hour conversation he had with Juan a week before the event. He spoke with high-minded bearing regarding Mel Gibson and compared Juan in similarly glowing terms, saying he knew he'd found in Juan a friend for life. Dirt bag slouches like the Bidens can't inspire such loyalty without tossing wads of cash as bribery.
Juan is also an unremitting follower of Q minutiae and can explain hidden facts behind Q posts at great length without any written notes.
One aspect of vetting is to appreciate (or not) what sort of acquaintances are ready to plunk down hundreds of dollars having only short notice to accompany the inviter to an event that would be largely unknown beforehand. I don’t think it’s logically up for realistic argument that the people at this event were heavy hitters—not gliteratti—that have in some cases given their life’s purpose in furtherance for the safety and advancement of We the People.
I shook hands with one of the Bundy’s, a two-star general, the purportedly top decorated Vietnam Green Beret, and multiple spec ops guys. Video and picture-taking was banned for good reason.
These high-moral-conviction people all knew what to do with a short-notice invitation from Juan. I perceived these people were straight arrows and they came to honor Juan’s invitation with their time and some shekels. I saw not one scintilla of misbehavior or amorality. Hotel security, however, probably would say that many attendees had to be repeatedly warned to keep their masks on in public areas lest the “scofflaws” be removed.
These consistent data points uniquely go toward affirming not that Juan has an infallible crystal ball, but that he is at least not someone with feet of clay who regularly leads his friends and important folk astray.
Jim Caviezel said the event had its genesis in a 4-hour conversation he had with Juan a week before the event. He spoke with high-minded bearing regarding Mel Gibson and compared Juan in similarly glowing terms, saying he knew he’d found in Juan a friend for life. Dirt bag slouches like the Bidens can’t inspire such loyalty without tossing wads of cash as bribery.
Juan is also an unremitting follower of Q minutiae and can explain hidden facts behind Q posts at great length without any written notes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Name dropping doesn’t help. We have religious leaders, war “heroes”, presidents (and fake presidents), doctors etc. all betraying us so naming their credentials doesn’t help.
Q said no outside Comms and didn’t make an exception for Juan O Savin. Whatever the ‘high moral’ standing of those present, it doesn’t mean Q vetted anyone present to speak for them.
We don’t agree at all. We seem to have canvassed this topic thoroughly today.
TECHNICAL ISSUES - UPDATE
Another tactic to try if you're unable to post to the new thread reported by a FReeQ:
"Fixed it by closing and reopening the thread."
I did ask him about claims that he was JFK, Jr. He denies that originated with him or that he has furthered it, which is not to say he views it as his responsibility to set aright any and all misconceptions about him.
Lots of individual high-and-mighties have failed us, 'tis true, but very rarely have those done so in a grand, coordinated fashion without enticements of sex, money, drugs or career advancement. Of those, I've never heard any of them being present surrounding Juan. Dropping names and credentials, do, IMHO, at some preponderant point have to be weighed against whatever counter-evidence may exist.
Unless you have some evidence. I think your comments seem to distort the record. As far as I can tell, you're using false and/or exaggerated claims against Juan, exclusively highlighting things that would tend to make him look bad.
I'm sure if you had No Name's comments about Juan to present here, the latter would look like a perfectly awful human being. IIRC, you pointed only to a court case where bad things may have happened, but in which Juan was only brought as a witness, not as a defendant. AFAIK, there wasn't a charge against him, nor did he have to pay anyone other than his lawyer(s).
Unless you have some evidence. I think your comments seem to distort the record. As far as I can tell, you’re using false and/or exaggerated claims against Juan, exclusively highlighting things that would tend to make him look bad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t have your personal investment in Juan O Savin. My comments stand.
From Twitter:
If there were a contraceptive vaccine, but after getting it you could still get pregnant ... and you still had to wear a condom, would you take it?
Asking for a friend.
AFAIC we’re in bad LSD nightmare-ville at this point.
Rather, it falls flat.
Can’t thank you enough for posting this.!
I have listened to O’ Savin a number of times he seems real,if he is he’s a super patriot.(of course so are you)
The obama regime needed Roberts to be on board with zero care and quick. What better way than to turn the zap from the Hammr on to Roberts. Find it all. Discover the NYT piece and go from there.
I checked this out extensively and it seems Roberts first wrote the "against" zero care before he discovered it was a tax.
It was a near instantaneously discovery for Roberts that he was against zero care. Like "do what we say we have the goods on you" or we out you. Scalia tried for a month to get him to change his mind but could not get through to him.
News today says the wreckage of TWA800 is now going to be destroyed.
Interesting that that would be an issue in these interesting times.
*******************************************************************************************
Yes, you would think that it would have already been destroyed. I do recall lil stephysnopolis spilling the beans on a news program shortly after 9/11. He was giving a list of terrorist attacks from memory—and mentioned TWA 800, there were funny looks all around, and they went directly to station break.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
