Posted on 02/16/2021 9:04:11 PM PST by hapnHal
Got a question.. Do the Covid-19 vaccines contain aborted baby body parts? It is being reported that aborted baby cell lines are being used in Covid-19 vaccines. Need clarification.
No.
Don’t trust anyone on this. If there is they’ll lie to your face.
By my understanding, for some vaccines, they are the initial source of testing objects used in development.
My friend, a pharmaceutical company exec, said the aborted baby cells were 50 years ago...not now.
No, that is an urban legend. They only TEST them on aborted baby parts. They even know it was a boy and it was from 1973 or something.
They say that somehow, that is completely different.
So like, your lamp is NOT made from dead Jews at Auschwitz. Only the lamp SHADE was. I think it’s sorta like that.
No
The 3rd, Astrazenica was developed from aborted fetal cells.
I will have to spend time to retrieve my sources.
There are multiple covid vaccines.
The one about whom the rumour of “it uses aborted baby parts” is the AstraZeneca vaccine
AstraZeneca did use the HEK 293 cell line to manufacture its vaccine (and Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna in the design of their vaccines). These cells originate from a baby which was aborted in the Netherlands in 1973.
The baby was not aborted for the purpose of vaccine research.
Over the decades that followed, these cells have been cloned and replicated, many times. Dr Paul Offit, an immunisation expert from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia who sits on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vaccine advisory committee, describes these as “standardized cell lines”. Professor Helen Petousis Harris says the cells used today are “distant descendants” of the original cells. They are from decades-old, long over abortions, and researchers do not use fetal cells from the present day.
The vaccine does not “contain” the aborted baby’s cellular material. The viral molecules grown in these cells are chemically and physically separated from the cells in which they were incubated and do not make it into the final product.
The cell line you are referring too was from a single Danish fetus aborted in 1973. Those cells would gave gone into the municipal garbage as was the practice at the time in Denmark. The fetus was not aborted for medical research the mother chose termination for other undisclosed but private reasons. As such the cellular material would have been in the trash literally. Those cells were then cultured aka cloned for the next 40 years again and again cloned in massive amounts being distributed and cloned again and again in multiple lines. Not a single cell 40+ years later is an original cell the cells are the hundredth or more generational clone of the original. Does it really matter given the material would have been waste anyways and now is cloned to such a degree to be directly responsible for the saving of millions of lives over the last 40 years. For that kind of society pay back you could grind up a live baby and save millions and call it a win for the species people make it sound like that’s.what is being done. Its not trash from 40+ years ago has been cloned and used for countless benefit to society and that’s the fact.
Just a clarification, G Larry — these were aborted fetal cells, but descendants of the 1973 aborted baby cells.
In addition, the AstraZeneca was NOT developed and does not contain the aborted baby’s cellular material.
type MRC-5 into your search engine.
See the chart in post #6.
I’m not sure if you’re joking, but this isn’t like that.
The comparison is more like using the processes and knowledge gained FROM the concentration camps (and the Japanese torture camps) that are currently used in modern day medicine.
see 10, also 3
So that makes it all good then
So then, you are in the, “the skin was made into a lampshade 80 years ago at Auschwitz, it was all legal under nazi laws in effect at that time, they weren’t murdered just for their skin, the body would have gone to the crematorium anyway, and.... I really need a lampshade” school of thought?
You do you boo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.