Have y'all seen this? TLDR Russia DID help Trump in 2016, but not how you think. "Russia turns Hillary's cheating software off, letting Trump win the Presidency fair and square". We've kicked this theory around a bit here. Naughty words Bigg Red!
Have y'all seen this? TLDR Russia DID help Trump in 2016, but not how you think. "Russia turns Hillary's cheating software off, letting Trump win the Presidency fair and square". We've kicked this theory around a bit here. Naughty words Bigg Red!
That is freaking excellent. Santa with hammer!
I figured back then that someone uncheated the 2016 cheat, but never dreamed it was Russia that did it.
numberonepal wrote:
“
“...basically the story is that “Russia” was interfering with the election to help Trump but Ratcliff wants it to say China.”
Have y’all seen this? TLDR Russia DID help Trump in 2016, but not how you think. “Russia turns Hillary’s cheating software off, letting Trump win the Presidency fair and square”. We’ve kicked this theory around a bit here. Naughty words Bigg Red!”
So...by what to me seems logical extension...
If in 2016, Putin turned off the Clinton cheat machines because they didn’t want corrupt Biden...
...why didn’t they turn off the cheat machine in 2020?
After all Biden is a primary POTUS candidate.
Am I missing something?
Did POTUS tell Putin to let the cheat machine roll on through in 2020 so POTUS could trap them?
If so, why does DNI not have a report ready, or, as suggested by CMZ is he still searching for evidence, if the trap was secure?
sniff...sniff...
..just a bit too much cowbell.
I’m not buying that Russia hacked the election system in 16 to stop the demonrats fraud scheme.
What I can buy is that Russia knew something about what demonrats, with China’s help, were up to and alerted the Trump team.
I can see Putin wanting Trump on power as a buffer against China because I don’t think Putin trusts China.
Now, the infighting that might, perhaps, be taking place among Ratcliffe’s report that might, perhaps, be delaying it might concern how much to let on about Russia’s interference in the interference.
I don’t know why the Russians would necessarily have been able to do that... unless... Snowden. . .!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Zuckerberg paid for the election judges. He purchased the drop boxes, contrary to state law... Zuckerberg paid the local officials who boarded up the windows to the counting room. Zuckerberg money purchased the machines—Dominion and otherwise." pic.twitter.com/iq8YtfmN4X— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) December 17, 2020
@ODNIgov announced that @DNI_Ratcliffe has been notified by the intelligence community that they will not be meeting the Dec. 18 deadline set by a presidential executive order to report on foreign threats during the November #2020Election https://t.co/j288F44Vli— Mimi NL (@MimiNguyenLy) December 17, 2020
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3916240/posts?page=1
ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Twitter Changes Rules Back to What They Were Before Election Now That they Manipulated Election Results
GP ^ | December 16, 2020 | Jim Hoft
Posted on 12/16/2020, 10:04:29 PM by White Lives Matter
This is quite extraordinary.
Twitter on Wednesday announced they were switching back rules to before the election.
The rules served their purpose. They were able to list any criticism of the fraudulent election as “disputed” or “fake news.”
And they especially hit President Trump hard.
That is just stupid. Russia didn’t want Hitlery just because Biden was VP for Obama during Hitlery’s SoS stint. Doesn’t make sense. Or is Mr Pottymouth implying that the Russians somehow knew that Biden would be the Rat nominee in 2020?
