Posted on 12/06/2020 8:48:32 AM PST by weston
Heather Red heartCherry blossom Jones
@heatherjones333
Newsmax Greg Kelly ran a story tonight that Republican congressman (Texas) Mike Patrick Confirmed the report about fighting in the supreme court. Chief Justice Roberts said he didn’t give a **** about Gore versus Bush. He said there weren’t riots back then. Roberts is a #Coward
I’m going to use that for my Christmas cards 😬
Intense as a cucumber? LOL
Are you back home now?
I was watching an old Alfred Hitchcock. It was one of those where an unsuspecting person drives through a small town and an over eager sheriffs Dopson for some imaginary problem. Then he ends up in jail, his car is broken and needs fixing, the judge is as corrupt as the sheriff, etc
I’ve always hated those scenarios. And I wish the person would just get out of that town and go somewhere else. Today I realized we live in that town. And the next town over is the same. And every other town is the same. And the corruption is at every single level. And you never know who you can trust.
I hope Rusty is already home, and....out of that small town/hotel. :- /
I feel like that!
Amen!!
So is our side supposed to start rioting in order to get the rule of law back? (I’m not advocating doing anything - this is a rhetorical question, BTW.)
Thank you for posting this remarkable recitation/pledge/declaration/oath/annotation/testament/your own take.
I am an oath keeper. I stand ready.
I hear ya.
LOL!
Honest story.
My kid and I bought a hamster from the pet store, that looked just like that little fellow in the meme you’ve posted.
It turns out the hamster had been attacked by a cat in his previous home, and was missing about half of his fur.
We decided to name the hamster “Spike”. It struck us as an appropriate name because we thought it sounded tough and reminded me of some obscure street gang character that I had seen on TV way back when almost all programming was black and white.
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1339671542037360640?s=21
🚨NEW: California prints ballots in direct violation of its own laws— rendering nearly ALL of CA votes invalid!! Amazing work by Daniel Bobinski for @UncoverDC . Please read and share! @GenFlynn @SidneyPowell1 @realDonaldTrump uncoverdc.com/2020/12/17/cal… via @NewBookofDaniel
More at link
Brilliant! LOL
Costco has the best fruitcake!
Thanks,hm.
Excellent video recapping where we are today with the election.
Only 12 minutes, but full of information.
By Daniel Bobinski
California has been mostly absent from the discussion of election law violation, but new information reveals that wording legally required to be on its ballots was missing, in direct violation of its own state law. This means the ballots should not have been cast or counted, yet California certified its ballots, anyway, and thus illegally cast its electoral votes for Joe Biden.
Let’s be clear about something: Our nation’s founders tried for years to work out their differences with England’s King George. But George was a tyrant, and a war broke out that lasted eight years. After that war, our founders avoided creating a government that was ruled by a man—they decided to be governed by laws.
Unfortunately, we now have states ignoring their own state and federal election laws, and by disregarding these laws, their election results must be nullified. Either that, or we’re no longer a country governed by laws.
California violated its own election laws
In California state law, the election code is titled “Division 13. BALLOTS, SAMPLE BALLOTS, AND VOTER PAMPHLETS.”
In Article 1 of this code we find Election Code 13200, which reads as follows:
“Ballots not printed in accordance with the chapter [Chapter 3] shall not be cast nor counted at any election.”
That’s straightforward English. It’s at the 9th grade reading level, so assuming California’s election officials can understand it, her it is one more time, with emphasis:
“Ballots not printed in accordance with the chapter [Chapter 3] shall not be cast nor counted at any election.”
When we read a little further, we find Section 13205. Since we’re talking about the election of the President and Vice President, we’ll look at the applicable subsection:
13205 (b). In elections when electors of President and Vice President of the United States are to be chosen, there shall be placed upon the ballot, in addition to the instructions to voters as provided in this chapter, an instruction as follows:
“To vote for all of the electors of a party, mark the voting target next to the names of the presidential and vice presidential candidates of that party. A mark of the voting target next to the name of a party and its presidential and vice presidential candidate, is a vote for all of the electors of that party, but for no other candidates.”
This Napa County ballot is missing required text from Section 13205 (b). California code 13244 states sample ballots must match actual ballots, including instructions.
In other words, by California law, the paragraph quoted was supposed to appear on all California ballots. And remember, according to Section 13200, “Ballots not printed in accordance with the chapter [Chapter 3] shall not be cast nor counted at any election.”
And guess what? According to data collected by the American Independent Party in California, those words did not appear on ballots in 53 of California’s 58 counties.
In the remaining five counties, ballots required additional wording that is outlined in California Election Code 12305 (c). Some of those county’s ballots included the wording from section (b), but ballots in all five of those counties were still missing the required wording from section (c).
This means 100 percent of California’s voting was conducted in complete violation of its state election laws.
Alpin
This Alpine County’s ballot has the required text for section 13205 (b) but not the text for section (c) which was required for Alpine County.
If the United States is to be a country governed by laws, none of the ballots from California should have been cast nor counted. It’s right there in California state code. Thus, all of California’s ballots are invalid, they cannot be officially counted in the state’s vote totals, and California’s electoral college votes must be invalidated.
Counterarguments
Naturally, some will say, “Oh, c’mon, it’s a just a technicality.”
Yep, and in 2016, a man named Donald Clark committed a home invasion that resulted in the death of a 77-year-old man. But Clark’s confession to the crime was later considered void because Clark “didn’t fully understand his Miranda rights when he waived them and confessed.” Thus, a killer was set free on a technicality.
In other words, technicalities matter.
The question remains: Are we a nation governed by laws, or aren’t we?
Wisconsin’s Supreme Court showed integrity recently when a technicality invalidated roughly 200,000 votes cast in its state. On Monday, Dec. 14 it ruled that roughly 200,000 votes were cast in violation of state law and cannot be counted. That ruling now casts doubt on the validity of Wisconsin’s electoral votes.
Pennsylvania violated federal election laws
In Pennsylvania, the governor and state Supreme Court clearly violated the supreme law of the land. Section IV, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution is clear:
The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the Legislature thereof; but Congress may at any time make or alter such regulations, except as to the place of choosing Senators. (Emphasis added.)
In simpler terms, the U.S. Constitution says the elected legislators of each state are to determine when, where, and how citizens will vote. The problem? Pennsylvania’s Governor Tom Wolf (a Democrat) ignored this clause after his state’s Republican legislature would not approve his request to extend voting for three days, nor accept mail-in ballots during that time window if they didn’t have postmarks. Refusing to take no for an answer, Wolf ran to the left-leaning Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which rubber-stamped his proposal.
Either we’re a nation of laws or we’re not. If states in our union are to be governed by laws and not lawless tyrants, Pennsylvania’s election process was not legal. Therefore, Pennsylvania’s electors were selected illegally, and their electoral college votes must be invalidated.
To review:
California’s laws clearly state that certain instructions need to appear on its presidential election ballots.
Those instructions did not appear on California’s ballots.
California’s laws clearly say that if the instructions do not appear, those ballots cannot be cast or counted.
Therefore, ballots from California cannot be cast nor counted.
And in Pennsylvania:
The U.S. Constitution is clear that a state’s legislature determines when, where, and how citizens will vote.
The governor and Supreme Court of Pennsylvania changed election procedures without consent of the state legislature.
Therefore, Pennsylvania’s election was unconstitutional.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
1h
New Peter Strzok Texts Undermine Official Narrative on Start of ‘Russia Collusion‘ Investigation https://breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/17/new-peter-strzok-texts-undermine-official-narrative-on-start-of-russia-collusion-investigation/ via
@BreitbartNews
. Check out last in his class John McCain, one of the most overrated people in D.C.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.