Heather Red heartCherry blossom Jones
@heatherjones333
Newsmax Greg Kelly ran a story tonight that Republican congressman (Texas) Mike Patrick Confirmed the report about fighting in the supreme court. Chief Justice Roberts said he didn’t give a **** about Gore versus Bush. He said there weren’t riots back then. Roberts is a #Coward
So is our side supposed to start rioting in order to get the rule of law back? (I’m not advocating doing anything - this is a rhetorical question, BTW.)
Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts is the Neville Chamberlain of our time.
In 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain signed a peace pact with Nazi Germany that amounted to an obsequious surrender to the threat of war against Britain by Germany.
It was a spineless and foolish act for which he has been soundly trounced.
In 2020 the obsequious Chief Justice Roberts unilaterally capitulates to the likely threat of violence by democrats by demanding the Supreme court not enforce the constitution and the law
against overt election fraud and election stealing by democrats.
Or did Roberts just use the threat of violence to justify another specious, law twisting, pro-democrat action on his part?