|
Posted on 12/01/2020 12:00:36 PM PST by ransomnote
"
(h/t foldspace)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Bringing this here from the old thread, for educational use only, DoJ on election fraud. May come in handy.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nh/pr/federal-election-fraud-fact-sheet
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Federal Election Fraud Fact Sheet
Most issues concerning the administration and conduct of elections are governed and regulated by state law and are best addressed by state and local election officials. Federal law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities have jurisdiction to investigate and, when appropriate, prosecute election fraud in the following circumstances:
I. Federal Criminal Jurisdiction
Federal criminal jurisdiction over the activities described below can generally be obtained when those activities take place:
In elections where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot.
In any election (federal or nonfederal), when the fraud involves the necessary participation of an election official acting “under color of law.”
In connection with voter registration. The fact that voter registration is “unitary” in all 50 States (a citizen registers once to become eligible to vote for both federal and nonfederal candidates) confers federal jurisdiction regardless of the type of election.
In connection with the misuse, or unauthorized trespass, involving a computer system used in connection with an election, to the extent that the misuse or trespass is conducted “under color of law.”
II. Conduct Actionable as Federal Election Fraud, Intimidation, or Suppression
The following activities provide a basis for federal prosecution under the statutes referenced in each category:
Paying voters to register to vote, or to vote in elections where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot (52 U.S.C. § 10307, 18 U.S.C. § 597), or through the use of the mails in those States where vote buying is a “bribery” offense (18 U.S.C. § 1952), or in federal elections in those States where purchased votes or registrations are voidable under state law (52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Multiple voting in a federal election, voting for individuals in a federal election who do not personally participate in the voting act attributed to them, or impersonating voters (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Intimidating voters through physical duress in any election (18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(A)); or through physical or economic intimidation in connection with registration to vote or voting in a federal election (52 U.S.C. § 20511, 18 U.S.C. § 594).If the victim is a federal employee, intimidation in connection with all elections is prohibited (18 U.S.C. § 610).
Malfeasance by election officials, acting “under color of law,” such as diluting valid ballots with invalid ones (so-called “ballot box stuffing”), rendering false vote tabulations, or preventing valid voter registrations or votes from being given effect in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242), as well as in elections where federal candidates are on the ballot (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Qualifying fictitious individuals to vote in federal elections by placing fictitious names on voter registration rolls (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511); or through “color of law” in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).
Preventing or impeding qualified voters from participating in an election where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot through such tactics as disseminating false information as to the date, timing, or location of federal voting activity (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).
Registering to vote, or voting in a federal election, by persons who are not entitled to vote under applicable state law, most notably persons who have committed serious crimes, and persons who are not United States citizens (18 U.S.C. §§ 1015(f), 611, and 52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Falsely claiming United States citizenship in connection with registering to vote or voting in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 911, 1015(f)).
Voting in a federal election by anyone who is not a United States citizen in those States where citizenship is a requisite for the franchise (currently all 50 States) (18 U.S.C. § 611).
Providing false information concerning a voter’s name, address, or period of residence in order to register to vote, or to vote in a federal election (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511).
Causing the submission of voter registrations in any election, or of ballots in federal elections, that are materially defective under applicable state law (52 U.S.C. § 20511).
Ordering, keeping, or having under one’s control any troops or armed men at any polling place in a general or special election, if one is a civil or military officer or employee of the United States government (18 U.S.C. § 592).
To report federal election fraud, intimidation, or suppression contact the United States Attorney’s Office Election Day Hotline at (603) 230-2503. Inquiries and complaints may also be submitted through the United States Attorney’s website at www.usdoj.gov/usao/nh by clicking on the “email us” link.
Releasing that in about 20 minutes! Should be rather interesting.
Something is up with Att/Cnn, stock has been doing very poorly lately, and for several years too despite a huge dividend.
Maybe! Optics! Or we are all crazy, could go either way at this point. I am going down with the ship who is with me?
Old Joe's choice for White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki wearing a commie hat with a hammer and sickle. (Not photoshopped) pic.twitter.com/jjDoVyrSu3— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) December 1, 2020
You need to bookmark that or keep it very handy, we may need it.
Point 1--Barr said he made Durham a special counsel in October, not today.
Point 2--This affords Durham special protections so that he cannot be fired by a new administration, similar to how Mueller could not be fired.
See Barr appoints special counsel in Russia probe investigation
I saw James this AM. He is supposed to have more, do you recall when?
CNN is trying to get James O'Keefe arrested for being a real journalist. #CNNTapes https://t.co/qMZCswsYWy— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) December 1, 2020
So did this really happen? Biden and Harris are briefed on the nation’s most closely held secrets??
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-receive-intelligence-briefing-d235a1e5bdc4bb8587de5c15d2945a38
Or was this why Joe was given the new boot??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Since it is carried by APNEWS, I think it’s best to consider it false. The Biden campaign WILL portray him as legitimate and in control of the presidency, even if he died 3 months ago.
I like your “boot” suggestion. :)
It’s supposed to be 7 pm eastern time.
Thanks
And if Biden pulls of the steal, the new Communist America... well... they’ll do more than arrest O’Keefe.
Was Barr delivering the bad news about the accusations of pay-to-play Presidential pardons. None if this makes sense!!
Thoughtful post re Bumbler. Any who voted for him should have their heads examined.
After they’ve been cracked open.
Biden would fire Durham on Day 1, claim it was a witch hunt created by a corrupt outgoing administration, and that will be the end of that, as far as the media is concerned. Twitter and Facebook will ban anyone who says otherwise.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
but then it would look like a Saturday Night Massacre...
*****************
It’s not a Saturday Night Massacre, if the MSM spins it.
The point of the sting is the old adage:
It’s not how you vote, it’s who counts the votes.
They have been watched. They are on record. They have been warned. All monitored, all given the chance to repent. All culpable in the eyes of the law.
My Son, at least, is no longer certain I’m a total conspiracy nut case,
considering current events... ;-)
~Easy
Would someone be so kind as to post the ACTUAL words in entirety of what Barr said today about election fraud?
I suspect that seeing the words entirely and without snipping, might be meaningful.
FREEPERS would finally meet face to face at reeducation camps or worse.
I have long wondered how long it would take before I got the knock on the door. Sir, are you “professional”? Please come with us...
I am going to weigh in here even if no one cares to read it.
1. Barr said he has seen “nothing that would change the outcome of the election”. There has been NO outcome as of yet.
2. DOJ as of now has NO jurisdiction to investigate the states. They will once Rudy gets to Dominion.
3. The only way the military can come in is if, the courts are deemed unfunctional. ( I a not sure I am putting that correctly.
4. The media ran with it to distract us from the devastating testimony from average Americans.
Hold the Line.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was thinking that with Barr’s announcement, the DOJ has no evidence, despite the fact that the Trump Campaign and Sidney’s powell’s evidence is in the news, puts the final piece in place for the public to accept Martial Law or portions therein. 3 out of 4 voters voted for Trump. Public hearings and witness accounts have been watched, and State/Federal courts are “not functioning”.
The perception holds true regardless of whether one holds the opinion that Barr is or is not serving The Plan. (white hat/black hat). I think he’s still white hat.
The alternative was for Barr to assert from the start that infiltrated traitors working with foreign enemies like China had gained significant access or control of DOJ assets. This would...ahem...”upset” the public and things would be have expected to escalate quickly.
But if Barr purposely assigned (too) few identified traitors (or none) to the investigation and they reported back that there simply is no evidence, and he announces publicly that the DOJ/FBI will not act, then it seems like we’re on the doorstep of Martial law with both the state and federal courts refusing to act to process voluminous evidence collected outside the DOJ.
I think we’re there. I think the military was always expected to intervene because the Deep State is dying and can’t just “give up”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
