Posted on 11/11/2020 8:16:55 AM PST by struggle
This showed up on twitter so take it for what it's worth.
Giuliani said on Steve Bannon's WarRoom podcast that whistleblowers from Dominion have come forward.
If it's true, then the DNC is absolute chaos right now.
Wow, dude, you have no idea what the hell you’re talking about. The statistical analyses are about SUPPORTING ALL THE OTHER EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.
They are a VITAL part of this case that support the fact that massive fraud that was shown by eyewitness testimony clearly affected the outcome of this election.
This would only serve to show that fraud occurred. It might strike off a second election, but it won't invalidate everything.
Unconstitutionally counting ballots after deadline holds up in court last I checked.
I agree with this. However, if they didn't set aside those ballots counted after a certain time, there's no way to ascertain which ones to throw out.
Software with intended glitches holds up in court last I checked.
Also correct, but as an IT engineer with experience in digital forensics, I can tell you that identifying this conclusively is going to be a yeoman's task, if possible at all.
good lord, nothing has been litigated yet, and here you are waving the white flag of surrender. There's a zoom hearing today @3PM in the Third Circuit of Michigan in front of Chief Judge Timothy Kenny. It's the first legal challenge that I know of. I'd normally share the link, but it would be wasted on someone like you.
Evidence of fraud is not proof. They have to prove the evidence is inculpatory. Otherwise it’s just hearsay.
Maybe not in and of itself but when combined with tangible evidence and witness testimony it can be quite persuasive. Few court hearings are decided with a “smoking gun” , rather, it’s the cumulative weight of all the evidence which carries the day.
But, but, every article and tv news blurb aboit the Trump Team lawsuits declares “without any evidence”....
I can think of a multitude of reasons:
He backed out of his own accord
He was threatened if he didn't back out
He was told to back out by attorney's for Trump's reelection (premature disclosure).
Hannity was told by Fox producers to scrubb him.
Your lack of understanding of how legal proceedings work is scary.
I'd normally share the link, but it would be wasted on someone like you.
That's okay. I can find it on my own, but I appreciate that you're dismissive. Speaks to character.
Kaleigh Mcenany has 64 written affidavits from republican observers who were shut out from LEGAL OBSERVATIONS ALLOWED.
In case you are not law educated, any breaking of law can end up in court at the discretion of the prosecutor.
The evidence of election theft is massive. At least it is in Nevada Pennsylvania Georgia Wisconsin Michigan and Minnesota. Which way will work best to clean it up tendons to be seen - courts, legislatures, congress state votes? After it is cleaned up for this election, president Trump will hopefully be able to get effective preventative measures into place to prevent another DNC ( or anyone else’s) election theft in future.
Evidence of fraud is the ONLY way to prove fraud.
Agreed. That's been my entire point. We're all basking in these articles that seem to buttress our case, but they're not definitive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford’s_law#Election_data
Benford’s Law was used in the 2004 presidential election litigation. It’s one tool in the tool box.
As Bannon might say to you....
Embrace the suck!
Courts decide cases (or should) on established law, including the Constitution.
One example of a problem discussed here it the three day extension in Pennsylvania. That goes against the laws the state legislature had in place - and therefore goes against the US Constitution.
There are legal challenges of the same sort (not applying existing election law - or exceeding it) in all six states that are being contested.
The allegations of fraud are icing on the cake - but it will be the adherence to election law that will be the cornerstone.
I feel like Bannon needs to stop talking so much. Yes. He needs to shut up and let the process unfold and then talk after. Speaking now is reckless and gives fodder for the enemies - more time for them to prep counter actions and wreak more havoc before anything good can happen!
You bet it does, I'm a fighter. Strange concept?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.