Posted on 10/26/2020 8:51:18 AM PDT by C19fan
Fresh analysis of Europe's earliest known battle has thrown up the possibility the 1,400 people who died at the site, in Germany's Tollense Valley, were not warriors engaged in a brutal melee, but ambushed merchants who were ruthlessly slain.
The identity of the assailants remains unknown but it is thought they surprised the entourage and killed their guards before looting and murdering them.
Human remains at the site in North East Germany, near today's border with Poland and 80 miles north of Berlin, were first found in 1996.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Zero. . . did not pay close enough attention to the dating. C19 and Red Badger got me into the correct millennium!!!
Like the American Indians of old attacking a wagon train?
Where would the merchants been going from or to? There isn’t much around there today, and even less back then.
1800 merchants are going to need a lot of customers.
The poor merchants were probably behind on their taxes to the local robber baron.
Thanks C19fan.
The rest of the Tollense Valley keyword:
Thats a hell of a conclusion to jump to. What are the odds that almost 2,000 Israelites would be wandering around that part of Europe at that time?
I think that post was sarcasm.
The more archaeologists “re-imagine” their works, the harder it gets to take them seriously.
Couldn’t have been warriors because doesn’t match imaginary image of warriors. Got it.
Had to be merchants because some of the skeletons showed signs of having had to carry heavy loads. Got it.
Warriors traveled in bands with their own slaves and other type persons playing the support and logistics role all throughout known history.
But that can’t be the case in this pre-history dig.
“What are the odds that almost 2,000 Israelites would be wandering around that part of Europe at that time?”
The article states 1400. Now it has been inflated almost 50%. Soon it will be 10s of thousands.
At that point in history it was probably proto-Germans killing other proto-Germans. But it could even have been Slavs or Celts.
Interesting subject, horribly written article.
Barbarian
Lives
Matter
The archaeologist concluded it was a gathering of merchants because some of them showed skeletal evidence of a lifetime of carrying burdens.
Doesn’t seem sufficient. Isotope or molecular evidence that they were not native?
They could have been builders, local slaves, litter bearers, miners.
1400 people would be a large town for Germany back then.
Large gatherings back then could have been religious primarily, trade second.
Maybe it was a raid on a village, a sacrifice, or a mass punishment.
Probably 2 long-distance trading caravans with their attendant security details just ‘bumped into’ one another. Or more likely 1 ambushed the other at the river crossing.
The bodies of the dead were stripped of all metals, so guessing that they were trading in Tin or Copper — the component metals of Bronze. Tin deposits are pretty rare and so the metal ore usually comes from great distances.
Another interesting bit: the combatants were asymmetrically armed with one side using flint arrow heads while the others used bronze.
> I wonder if DNA analysis would find them to be Jewish merchants?
Wie Geht’s Mein Herr!
3250 years ago was before the first temple was even built. I doubt the were “jews”.
As a German American, I demand reparations!
Right in the middle of the bronze age - they were likely transporting copper and tin ingots. Copper was possibly from Upper Peninsula of Michigan and 99% pure (today’s copper is 2-4%) somebody mined over 231,000 tons out during 3,000BC-1,000BC - not the locals (that would be 4620 rail ore cars at 50 tons each). None of it has been accounted for.
Copper was more valuable than gold as weapons (and more) were made from it. So if those robbers heard about the merchants cargo of copper and tin ingots their was lots of incentive to take it and to make sure no one lived to squeal. For the merchants safety was in numbers, but they just didn’t have the numbers to fend off the likely thousands in the attacking band of robbers.
Have apologized profusely already for not paying enough attention to the date. You are correct.
This was a battle in northern Germany not far from Danzig.
Any copper would have been from European sources. Some Tin was found. Might have been from Wales or The alps.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/slaughter-bridge-uncovering-colossal-bronze-age-battle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tollense_valley_battlefield
Then who took the missing 230,000 tons of pure copper during the height of the Bronze Age? There is more than ample evidence that people went between NA, Europe, and Near East in those times
“Then who took the missing 230,000 tons of pure copper during the height of the Bronze Age? There is more than ample evidence that people went between NA, Europe, and Near East in those times”
PIF: The discussion here was about a bronze age massacre in Northern Germany and someone posited an assumption that they had copper and it was stolen based on the fact that little or no copper was found on with the dead. Then there was a further assumption that the assumed missing copper that was not found with the dead came from North America.
Get your sources together and post a thread on the subject of North American Copper trade with Europe and let me know.
Supplies!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.