Less Than $740 To Go!!
Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 09/22/2020 3:32:45 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice
Cursive has been controversial for years. The striking thing is that the Education Establishment feels really, really strongly about cursive. They hate it! But why are they so emotional?
One professor of education stated emphatically: "Teaching cursive handwriting is an outdated waste of time."
A second professor of education, quoted in the New York Times, was equally dogmatic: "Districts and states should not mandate the teaching of cursive. Cursive should be allowed to die."
You are hearing the imperious voice of an impatient Education Establishment. They do not want to discuss pros and cons. They want to have a funeral and bury this nuisance from the past. Cursive is no darn good, now do what they say.
On the other side of the divide, many phonics experts think that cursive is essential. Most importantly, it makes children focus on the shapes of the letters. Literacy happens faster and more permanently when phonics is complemented by cursive.
When you have neither phonics nor cursive (and this is the official recommendation of our Education Establishment) you have almost no literacy at all. Isn't that an intriguing convergence?
Apparently our professors of education want exactly this sad outcome. They got rid of phonics starting in 1931. Just as astonishing, they have waged an endless war against it ever since, even though their own ideas produced dismal results. US literacy rates are low; millions of functional illiterates have been created. Isn't it reasonable to guess that illiteracy, at the end of the day, is a strategic goal of our Progressive professors?
Imagine their indignation when non-credentialed amateurs try to use cursive to pull phonics back from the grave. They have told us for 80 years that phonics is bad for kids, cursive is a waste of time, and that should be the end of the discussion.
Imagine the gloomy frustration they feel when peasants insist on disobeying. Arguably, the whole point of eliminating phonics and cursive is to make the peasants less literate and easier to control.
Reading is the most important skill but our Education Establishment succeeded in crippling it with a single stroke. They get a lot of bad press from killing phonics; but that's a price they don't seem to mind paying. There is now a counter-attack on behalf of phonics; many people say the balance of evidence is all for phonics. But our Education Establishment shouts, back off. They want cooperative, interdependent children. Too much literacy gets in the way of their social engineering schemes.
So that's the battlefield any time the cursive debate is introduced. Cursive is like waving a red flag at a bull. All the official experts rush out to denounce cursive in dramatic terms. Maybe it's my imagination but I think I can feel their desperation.
They must have figured out that once children learn cursive, they will inevitably figure out phonics for themselves. They become accustomed to seeing letters and syllables; they think it's normal to read left to right.
Our professors of education don't want to lose control of reading instruction, which means they must keep denouncing cursive. But none of the reasons they mention have anything to do with why they hate cursive.
Cursive works, that's why they hate it. Phonics works, that's why they hate it. Any ordinary person may have difficulty even guessing why the Education Establishment kicked out phonics. You might assume they would want reading; truth is, they don't want reading. Assume that and then everything they do makes sense.
The proper way to teach English reading is with phonics, not sight-words, but they have kept sight-words in the schools for 80 years. When children don't learn to read in those early grades, you know they can't read vocabulary from Geography or History or Science. So what are they doing all day? Not much. But the Kings of Chutzpah will tell us, there is simply no time to teach cursive!
When people go into teaching, you can probably assume they love education. But the people at the top? You should probably assume they hate education. What they love is social engineering. Education for them is just one part of an ideological machinery that most of us don't know exists. Education, real education, gets in their way.
On the good side, their irritation tells you exactly the direction you should go if you want improvement in K-12.
Get rid of the goofy theories and methods that they love so much. In particular, eliminate any version of Sight-words, any version of Common Core, and any version of Constructivism All of these things have multiple names because the professors want to keep us confused. That is something they do really well.
––––––––––––––––
Bruce Deitrick Price explains education theories on his site Improve-Education.org. His newest book is "Saving K-12 – What happened to our public schools? How do we fix them?"
© Bruce Deitrick Price
I like that.
Yes, but the kids can’t type either.
So how do they do their exams?
Writing in cursive is a lot faster than printing.
I think someone had an answer for me once but it didn’t stick with me.
You think that all the printed versions have errors?
I think the commonly available school versions are paraphrased to say what liberals think they should say.
Did you know that the second amendment says that you have the right to be drafted? Well, according to my niece's fourth grade history book that is what it said.
Nothing takes the place of source documents to keep people honest.
Could it be that the Constitution is written in cursive?!
They dropped cursive and other lessons to make room to teach social justice theory.
“You think that all the printed versions have errors?”
“ALL”? Of course not ALL. But things are being revised all the time when it comes to school books in the left’s attempt to re-write history.
And if the communists ever do truly take over, the Bible will be forbidden, and probably so will the founding documents in easy-to-read printed form. The more skills people have under their belts, the better it will be.
Why is that true? It is definitely true for me, while I can get information on simple subjects (cooking, how to use a tool) from digital or blog, but I much prefer things printed out if what I’m reading is more complex. I thought it was just that I am older and my brain matured before the digital age. But you are saying this is true of most people? I’m just curious what the reason is!
The link does not provide the study...Can you check on this again?
Nevermind...The next word, “Also,” in the paragraph was hyperlinked—which is why link was not coming up with study...
Interesting study. Thanks for posting.
https://naturalsociety.com/how-cursive-writing-affects-brain-development/
I guess you never read any of John Taylor Gattos books. https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0865718547/ref=dp_ob_neva_mobile
Great posting, Bubba!
Kids can peck at keyboard but they can’t close their eyes and type out 40-60 words per minute like most of us here probably can. They can’t spell for crap either. Teachers don’t even grade spelling like they used to.
I took typing in 10th grade. Served me well in later classes and in college. Touch typing at speed is a good skill.
On handwriting... My dad, b.1909, learned the Palmer method of cursive writing. Even in his late 70s he had beautiful, legible handwriting.
Personally, I find it difficult to understand how someone can graduate from HS and not even write in cursive.
H2 and HB drafting leads
************************************
I’m still using both leads and I began in the mid-’60s.
Now, they are mostly used for crossword puzzle books.
I took typing in 10th also... Learned lotus 123 in that class too I think. It’s a spreadsheet like Excel.
They teach 1/2 a year of cursive in 6th grade I think. How are they going to sign their names?
Oh last year a had a check stolen from the mail and fraudulently cashed. Well I had to write the statement for my bank in cursive. Man was that hard! My hand was all cramped up afterwards. I guess they had to compare the handwriting.
I think “art” is a pretty dumb class and they teach it at least for 11 years.
...original thinkers.
_________________
Can’t be having that originality spread among the slaves, now can you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.