Posted on 08/01/2020 3:15:59 PM PDT by Libloather
Much has been made about the “veto-proof” majority of Seattle City Council members who committed on Twitter and elsewhere to cutting 50% of the Seattle Police Department’s budget. But in the near term, the reality is proving more complicated.
On Friday, council members for the first time offered specific proposals and timelines for cutting the department’s budget and creating alternative systems to prevent violence and provide community safety. They also urged Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best to prioritize responding to violent crimes and to deprioritize calls that could disproportionally impact communities of color.
Only one council member, Kshama Sawant, proposed immediate and blunt cuts that could slash close to 50% of the department’s remaining 2020 budget. The rest offered proposals for this year that would slice 100 full-time equivalent positions - out of 1,428 fully trained, probationary and recruited officers - from the department through layoffs and attrition, while shuffling some police functions into other city departments.
“There are, no doubt, roadblocks to us being able to do that 50%,”
Councilmember Tammy Morales said in an interview Friday, as the council began to look at specific proposals for cutting the police budget. “But what we’re presenting today is the downpayment…. We do plan to continue this work through the next six to nine months, really understanding what would a community safety department system look like that doesn’t center police but really is about violence prevention and safety.”
(Excerpt) Read more at crosscut.com ...
I guess safety is out.
Only one council member, Kshama Sawant, proposed immediate and blunt cuts
Some might call me a bigot, but so be it. This Sawant woman is an idiot, and she should go back to India and fix India, rather than come to my country, and try to fundamentally transform it.
So police should wait for crimes to turn violent before responding instead of trying to deescalate situations that have not yet become violent. Brilliant, just fing brilliant.
That's a no-brainer since the bulk of violent crimes coincidentally involves "communities of color" (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean).
Before they defund anything, how about finding the killers at large of the 3 youths at SeattleChop? Or aren’t the city council members concerned about black on black crime?
These proceedings are getting boring—we need to send them some Twinkies. :-)
So I can fill up a truck with stolen merchandise, but as long as I’m not violent, no cops? Cool!
Offer the night manager half the take, and the two of you can empty the place—might take a lot of trucks, though. :-)
Good luck.
Businesses will line up for miles to start up in a city with No Police ,all the Peace Love and Dancing in the streets
This happens sometimes, where theft from retailers facilities, warehouses, trucks, etc. are inside jobs. Sometimes they just give security guards some cash to be on their break when the thieves haul away merchandise. I hope that’s harder to do now with security cameras everywhere. But clever criminals will find a way.
Businesses must be threatening to leave.
Most of the new “social workers” hired, will be ex cops.
They are all trained negotiators etc.
All they are doing is rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship.
You are not alone in that sentiment. There are some on the council that share it.
Social services will handle all domestic violence calls. You know the ones where the person ringing the doorbell is shot and killed.
“They also urged Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best to prioritize responding to violent crimes and to deprioritize calls that could disproportionally impact communities of color.”
This ought to be interesting to watch Seattle burn. Hopefully the city council is at the epicenter of the fire pit when it does go up in flames
Truck full of stolen merchandise and——
“to deprioritize calls that could disproportionally impact communities of color.”
So wear your theatrical blackface makeup for crimes.
Reminds me of the ill fated attempts to force local police to stop disproportionately pulling over and ticketing persons of color. Each race should get equal tickets or it would be called “driving while black.”
If the racially balanced quota was reached, such as 15% tickets to blacks out of each expected monthly 100 tickets, and this was done at the end of the first week or cops would soon go into 60-80 or 110 tickets for blacks by the 30th of the month, then cops had to refrain from any more traffic stops of anyone black until a new calendar month began.
Only whites were stopped after that certain day of the month. Some whites meekly did a minor backlash.
Before they defund anything, how about finding the killers at large of the 3 youths at SeattleChop? Or aren’t the city council members concerned about black on black crime?”
They are saying they want to de-prioritized crimes that might unduly target POC. So black on black crime would mean that one of the blacks would be unfairly targeted. The same with POC domestic disturbance. They don’t want to interfere with the black dude beating his wife because he’s just trying to show her who’s the boss according to his culture.
Bit of a contradiction there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.