Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris on Killing Babies in Abortions: “We Need to Declare It a Priority”
LIFE NEWS ^ | October 23, 2019 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/23/2019 7:54:40 PM PDT by Morgana

Kamala Harris is an ardent abortion activist — no pro-life voter could be addlepated about that.

But Harris wants to make sure Democrat presidential primary voters know she’s staunching in favor of abortion as many babies as possible, right up to birth. Harris is so pro-abortion she just told an audience that killing babies in abortions is something that should be declared “a priority.”

Naturally, Harris wrapped this horrific reality in language about so-called “reproductive rights.” Here’s more:

“We need to have presidential candidates indicate where they stand on it, and we need to declare it a priority like any other health-care priority,” Harris said in an interview with The Daily Iowan.

“Yet again, we were embarked on, you know, a very long discussion (about health care), and it hadn’t come up, and it affects over half the population,” Harris said to the DI, referring to what she sees as the lack of debate about women’s reproductive health care.

Harris told the DI that states such as Alabama that drastically tightened their abortion laws are “completely out of touch with reality.” Under Alabama’s law, doctors who perform a banned abortion would be charged with a Class-A felony and could face life in prison.

Harris highlighted reproductive rights in her stump speech, saying that state legislatures “dare to impede on a woman’s right to reproductive health care.”

So unless you support killing babies in abortions you’re out of touch with reality, Harris says without any sense about how she’s projecting.

During the debate, Harris said it wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say “women will die” because of restrictive women’s health-care laws passed by Republicans in state legislatures.

Except it’s a huge exaggeration. Harris was solidly refuted when she made the false claim. And even the liberal Washington Post recently debunked the myth. In May, the Post fact checker found what pro-life advocates have been saying for years: that few women died from illegal abortions in the decade prior to Roe v. Wade, and a rise in the use of antibiotics appears to be the biggest factor in the drop in maternal abortion deaths, not the legalization of abortions.

Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter.

Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a former abortionist and co-founder of NARAL, admitted later in life that their “statistics” about back alley abortions were false. Nathanson said abortion activists often claimed between 5,000 and 10,000 women died every year from dangerous, back alley abortions and argued that legalizing abortions would protect women.

He wrote: “I confess that I knew that the figures were totally false and I suppose that others did too if they stopped to think of it. But in the ‘morality’ of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted … The overriding concern was to get the laws eliminated, and anything within reason that had to be done was permissible.”

Meanwhile, Harris wants to make it illegal for states to pass pro-life laws.

In Harris’ plan, The Reproductive Rights Act, there would be a “pre-clearance” requirement to make it harder for states to impose restrictions on abortion providers, including waiting periods and “imposing medically unnecessary doctor supervision requirements.” Her plan would also make any changes to abortion laws unenforceable until the Justice Department certifies it is in accordance with Roe v. Wade.

Never mind that the Constitution doesn’t allow the federal government to dictate what laws states can pass nor does it give the federal government authority to deep six laws it disapproves. Out of touch with reality indeed.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: abortion; cmoniwannalayaharris; horizontalharris; hotlipsharris; isshealegalcandidate; kamalaharris; notnaturalborn; notqualified; prolife; sleepingherway2top; williebrownsharlot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: atc23

We need to count our blessings that Harris’ campaign is doing so poorly.

This woman is ruthless and downright evil — with just enough intelligence that she could do some real damage.


21 posted on 10/24/2019 6:12:00 AM PDT by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

She displays her racism through her abortion ferver. However, it is also one more short comfortable step, to the act of euthanasia of the aged. Thereby, making room for the surviving population, and saving money on both educatiion and healthcare!!


22 posted on 10/24/2019 9:13:37 AM PDT by Terry L Smith (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It is painfully obvious that Harris was NOT aborted.....

HOWEVER:

Kamala Harris is NOT ELIGIBLE to hold the office of President of the USA, or to hold ANY office that can succeed President of the USA.

Her parents came to the USA as students, from Jamaica & from India. Fell in love, and got married.

NEITHER was a USA citizen when Kamala was born. Possible about 5-6 years later, they did become citizens.

Article II
Section 1
Clause 5 of the Constitution is clear about this.

Too bad more info about Obama wasn’t present when Howard Dean, Pelosi & the Dems rushed him into candidacy for the Presidential office. He did have ONE parent —his ‘mother’—but his father certainly was NOT a USA citizen.

HIS Presidency has become an unmitigated disaster on many fronts.

We certainly do not need any kind of repeat with Kamala or any other person who is NOT ELIGIBLE.

Please pass this info on.


23 posted on 10/24/2019 10:05:04 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It is painfully obvious that Harris was NOT aborted.....

HOWEVER:

Kamala Harris is NOT ELIGIBLE to hold the office of President of the USA, or to hold ANY office that can succeed President of the USA.

Her parents came to the USA as students, from Jamaica & from India. Fell in love, and got married.

NEITHER was a USA citizen when Kamala was born. Possible about 5-6 years later, they did become citizens.

Article II
Section 1
Clause 5 of the Constitution is clear about this.

Too bad more info about Obama wasn’t present when Howard Dean, Pelosi & the Dems rushed him into candidacy for the Presidential office. He did have ONE parent —his ‘mother’—but his father certainly was NOT a USA citizen.

HIS Presidency has become an unmitigated disaster on many fronts.

We certainly do not need any kind of repeat with Kamala or any other person who is NOT ELIGIBLE.

Please pass this info on.


24 posted on 10/24/2019 10:06:15 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

BTTT

But no republican will declare her ineligible or file a law suit.

Would like ahem debate moderator to ask. How many of you think Senator Harris is natural born citizen. Show of hands please.


25 posted on 10/24/2019 10:07:00 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Sorry about double post

Computer is acting up

BUT- It is good content to actually post twice....:)


26 posted on 10/24/2019 10:08:14 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson