Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would have to RENOUNCE their royal titles if they want to move to...
DM ^ | 10/22/2019 | Green

Posted on 10/22/2019 11:08:50 AM PDT by RummyChick

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will have to 'renounce their royal privileges ' ahead of any planned move to South Africa, a royal expert has suggested.

The Duke, 35, and Duchess of Sussex, 38, voiced their desires to live in the country on ITV's Harry & Meghan: An African Journey, which aired on Sunday and charted the pair's ten-day tour in South Africa.

However royal correspondent Victoria Arbiter told the New Zealand talk show Breakfast that there are a number of reasons a move to South Africa cannot occur while the couple remain members of the royal family.

Questioning whether the British or South African taxpayer would fund their security, she added that showing 'favouritism' to one Commonwealth nation would not be fulfilling their 'responsibility' to the Queen.

'That’s just not going to be OK unless, of course, they renounce all of their royal privileges, their royal titles, everything to do with their life as a member of the royal family', she said. 'I don’t see that happening, either.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: meagain; meghan; princeharry; royals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Arlis

That’s right. Anyone who can’t see what’s going on there is ignorant.


61 posted on 10/22/2019 1:17:51 PM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Right, like they’re going to exchange their privileged lifestyle for SA, a country on its way to 3rd world status.

This is all because she wanted headlines.


62 posted on 10/22/2019 1:22:43 PM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Excellent comment.

And on and on it goes. Today is my last day for looking at DM. Enough already.

But grand fun reading the negative comments....people are so onto this rotten excuse for a human being. Apparently, bad publicity is still publicity.


63 posted on 10/22/2019 1:25:33 PM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

“There ARE laws that govern what they do, go, and get paid or not.”

Yes. And the New Zealand talk radio station’s official “royal correspondent” didn’t cite any of those laws, or any precedent or any rules or even the Queen’s stated expectations. Just her own (absurd) opinion that no royal can ever live in any one part of the Queen’s realm because if they do, all the other parts will get jealous.


64 posted on 10/22/2019 1:26:21 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
Qualifications of the so-called "royal expert" that this article is based on. From her own website:

"CNN Royal Commentator Victoria Arbiter has spent a lifetime in close proximity to the British Royal Family. Her extensive knowledge and objectivity offers a unique perspective based purely on fact and insider knowledge. Upon the engagement of Prince William to Catherine Middleton, CBS News invited Victoria to return to her native London to serve as Special Royal Correspondent for the couple’s 2011 wedding. Following her three months of comprehensive coverage leading up to the event, Victoria sat alongside Erica Hill outside Buckingham Palace as a part of Katie Couric’s live, day-long broadcast of the Royal Wedding.

Am I the only one who thinks that spending a day outside of a palace with Katie Couric doesn't make you an expert of the British Constitution?

65 posted on 10/22/2019 1:32:08 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

amusing factoid....
The Duke of Windsor, spouse of Wallis Simpson is buried at....Frogmore...

...make of that what you will...

cheers!


66 posted on 10/22/2019 1:35:45 PM PDT by Covenantor (https://www. are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
I enjoy ready the DM, but also read 2 or 3 other Brit papers a day. The comments sections are a LOT of fun; though many times also somewhat disturbing due to the abject stupidity of many.

But I also read a lot of articles that are NOT about any royals, and especially like the book review sections.

Have you seen the blindingly horrid photos of her from last night? ROTFLMSO...she looks ridiculous!

Many thanks for your kind words re my post.

67 posted on 10/22/2019 1:38:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Because it was foolishly assumed that those who heard it would KNOW about them; which YOU obviously don't.

Since you obviously care SO much, might I suggest that you go do an in depth study of ALL such rules and laws? ;^)

68 posted on 10/22/2019 1:41:52 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
LOL...oh I know! :-)

And Queen Victoria HATED Frogmore and all of the chirping, hopping frogs there.

69 posted on 10/22/2019 1:43:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Because it was foolishly assumed that those who heard it would KNOW about them; which YOU obviously don't.

Foolishly assumed ... by a woman whose qualifications on his own resume are that she once spent a day outside a palace with Katie Couric. Pardon me for not recognizing her authority.

"CNN Royal Commentator Victoria Arbiter has spent a lifetime in close proximity to the British Royal Family. Her extensive knowledge and objectivity offers a unique perspective based purely on fact and insider knowledge. Upon the engagement of Prince William to Catherine Middleton, CBS News invited Victoria to return to her native London to serve as Special Royal Correspondent for the couple’s 2011 wedding. Following her three months of comprehensive coverage leading up to the event, Victoria sat alongside Erica Hill outside Buckingham Palace as a part of Katie Couric’s live, day-long broadcast of the Royal Wedding."

70 posted on 10/22/2019 1:53:38 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Well...she did have a whole department to look it all up. Maybe YOU should get one too.

You obviously don't know the first thing about the rules and laws that govern the Royals, so WHY are you even reading, let alone posting to such a thread?

71 posted on 10/22/2019 2:04:02 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

The argument against Harry and Megan Ono being being denied security would be the safety of the baby. I think the Royals wouldn’t shed a tear if Megan was dragged off by some crazy terrorist group and sold as a slave, and they’d feel bad for Harry but amongst royals they are prepared to say “see ya” to family members that don’t play the game. But the baby, that’s a different matter.


72 posted on 10/22/2019 2:04:35 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Wallis is buried right next to him. Halfwit and MeAgain supposedly got the use of a dumpy house (formerly used to house workers on the Windsor estate) under the Heathrow flight path, close to paths used by the public, and near to a royal mausoleum/cemetery containing an unsuitable American divorcee who married a royal and her weak, idiot husband. I wonder if H and M got the message.


73 posted on 10/22/2019 2:06:52 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

;>)


74 posted on 10/22/2019 2:09:22 PM PDT by Covenantor (https://www. are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
I really doubt that either of these two morons "got it".

Harry would NEVER have graduated from ANY school if 1)his tutors hadn't done most of the work 2) he wasn't the grandson of the Queen. He's an uneducated cretin, who went to good schools is all.

And the duchess of disaster knows almost NO Brit history at all and really couldn't care less if she tried. She's also a birdbrain; just a cunning, very manipulative one.

75 posted on 10/22/2019 2:18:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Harry is looking very old...he looks like an inmature old man....
Meghan’s stepsister Samantha advised Harry not to marry her....
she divides families..... she is a trouble maker...
now her ex husband Trevor Engelson is very very happy... re-married to a nice woman.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6256601/Meghan-Markles-ex-Trevor-Engelson-marries-millionaires-daughter-Tracey-Kurland.html

and Harry’s ex-girlfriend.... Cressida Bonas, a beautiful girl is going to get marry next year,,,,, handsome boyfriend....his name is Harry... but different personalities....

those who laugh last ...... laugh better....


76 posted on 10/22/2019 2:28:03 PM PDT by sarli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Surprised Harry still had enough guts to defy her orders about hunting last Christmas. What’s the odds on him hunting this year?

When she pulled that stunt last year, the DM's comments sections were full of references to her leather shoes, handbags, coats, and some cutsie story she had trotted out about cooking Harry a chicken dinner when they first met.

77 posted on 10/22/2019 4:11:02 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Speaking of leaving early. There was something with them all out on the lawn at Buckingham (?) recently. Charles and Camilla came up to them to whisper something in each of their ears which looked like they told them good bye. She was later spotted sulking in the car. At some point while at the get together, she was photographed sticking her tongue out. It was rumored she was sticking her tongue out at Camilla so they were asked to leave. I don’t know but only read about it. If that has any bit of truth, well...


78 posted on 10/22/2019 4:13:58 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

The cottage is only a couple of football fields from the cemetery but there are trees blocking much of the view. That still might be too close for comfort.


79 posted on 10/22/2019 4:47:46 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

It was at the “engagement” T.V. interview, when she first went on and on and on about being a VEGAN and then said that she was making her “favorite meal” for “H” ( as she now claims she calls him...as in HEROINE, I suppose )....CHICKEN! LOL


80 posted on 10/22/2019 5:43:09 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson